Clinical trials in stem cell therapy: pitfalls and lessons for the future.

Pat Metharom, Brendan Doyle, Noel M Caplice
{"title":"Clinical trials in stem cell therapy: pitfalls and lessons for the future.","authors":"Pat Metharom,&nbsp;Brendan Doyle,&nbsp;Noel M Caplice","doi":"10.1038/ncpcardio0730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first human trial of stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease was performed 4 years ago. Since that time, almost a dozen studies have reported the early and late clinical effects of cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction and chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. Initial nonrandomized trials universally showed slight improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction. Later randomized, controlled trials, however, suggested a less significant effect. They showed either no difference between cell therapy and control treatment or a slight treatment benefit with cell therapy that is lost by 12 months' follow-up. These results have dampened the enthusiasm of some members of the scientific community for the continuation of clinical trials. Because early phase I trials should not be judged on issues other than safety, however, research is unlikely to be hindered. Indeed, the clinical studies reported so far have already taught us a lot about the biology of myocardial repair. Achieving clinical success will, however, probably require much more investment in basic and experimental research. Here, we address some of the current pitfalls in clinical cell therapy trials and lessons that should be learned as we face the challenges of the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":51263,"journal":{"name":"Nature Clinical Practice. Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"4 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S96-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/ncpcardio0730","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Clinical Practice. Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The first human trial of stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease was performed 4 years ago. Since that time, almost a dozen studies have reported the early and late clinical effects of cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction and chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. Initial nonrandomized trials universally showed slight improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction. Later randomized, controlled trials, however, suggested a less significant effect. They showed either no difference between cell therapy and control treatment or a slight treatment benefit with cell therapy that is lost by 12 months' follow-up. These results have dampened the enthusiasm of some members of the scientific community for the continuation of clinical trials. Because early phase I trials should not be judged on issues other than safety, however, research is unlikely to be hindered. Indeed, the clinical studies reported so far have already taught us a lot about the biology of myocardial repair. Achieving clinical success will, however, probably require much more investment in basic and experimental research. Here, we address some of the current pitfalls in clinical cell therapy trials and lessons that should be learned as we face the challenges of the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干细胞治疗的临床试验:陷阱和对未来的教训。
干细胞治疗心血管疾病的首次人体试验是在4年前进行的。从那时起,近十几项研究报道了细胞治疗在急性心肌梗死和慢性缺血性心肌病中的早期和晚期临床效果。最初的非随机试验普遍显示左心室射血分数略有改善。然而,后来的随机对照试验表明,效果不那么显著。结果显示,细胞疗法和对照疗法之间要么没有区别,要么在12个月的随访中,细胞疗法的治疗效果微乎其微。这些结果挫伤了科学界一些成员继续进行临床试验的热情。然而,由于早期I期试验不应该根据安全性以外的问题进行判断,因此研究不太可能受到阻碍。事实上,迄今为止报道的临床研究已经教会了我们很多关于心肌修复的生物学知识。然而,要取得临床成功,可能需要在基础研究和实验研究上投入更多资金。在这里,我们讨论了目前临床细胞治疗试验中的一些陷阱,以及我们在面对未来挑战时应该吸取的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Untranslated Promoter Regions for HLA Class I Genes. Prevalence of allergen sensitization in 1000 adults in Saskatchewan. Tinea pedis and onychomycosis frequency in diabetes mellitus patients and diabetic foot ulcers. A cross sectional - observational study. Imaging left ventricular remodeling: targeting the neurohumoral axis. Targeted imaging of myocardial damage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1