Stem cell mobilization by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in acute myocardial infarction: lessons from the REVIVAL-2 trial.

Dietlind Zohlnhöfer, Adnan Kastrati, Albert Schömig
{"title":"Stem cell mobilization by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in acute myocardial infarction: lessons from the REVIVAL-2 trial.","authors":"Dietlind Zohlnhöfer,&nbsp;Adnan Kastrati,&nbsp;Albert Schömig","doi":"10.1038/ncpcardio0745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experimental studies and early-phase clinical trials suggest that mobilization of bone marrow stem cells by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can be used to improve cardiac regeneration after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In order to more fully evaluate this intervention in patients with AMI, we conducted the Regenerate Vital Myocardium by Vigorous Activation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells (REVIVAL-2) clinical trial. Following successful reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI, patients were randomly assigned to receive a subcutaneous daily dose of 10 microg/kg G-CSF or placebo for 5 days. Treatment with G-CSF produced a significant mobilization of stem cells. After 4-6 months the reduction in infarct size from baseline, as determined by technetium-99-labeled single-photon-emission CT, did not differ significantly between the G-CSF group and the placebo group. Furthermore, the improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, as assessed by late-enhancement MRI, did not differ significantly between the two groups. G-CSF treatment did not increase the risk of adverse clinical events and did not promote restenosis. Our trial demonstrates that stem cell mobilization by G-CSF does not improve infarct size, left ventricular function, or coronary restenosis in patients with AMI who have had successful mechanical reperfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51263,"journal":{"name":"Nature Clinical Practice. Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"4 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S106-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/ncpcardio0745","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Clinical Practice. Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Experimental studies and early-phase clinical trials suggest that mobilization of bone marrow stem cells by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can be used to improve cardiac regeneration after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In order to more fully evaluate this intervention in patients with AMI, we conducted the Regenerate Vital Myocardium by Vigorous Activation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells (REVIVAL-2) clinical trial. Following successful reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI, patients were randomly assigned to receive a subcutaneous daily dose of 10 microg/kg G-CSF or placebo for 5 days. Treatment with G-CSF produced a significant mobilization of stem cells. After 4-6 months the reduction in infarct size from baseline, as determined by technetium-99-labeled single-photon-emission CT, did not differ significantly between the G-CSF group and the placebo group. Furthermore, the improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, as assessed by late-enhancement MRI, did not differ significantly between the two groups. G-CSF treatment did not increase the risk of adverse clinical events and did not promote restenosis. Our trial demonstrates that stem cell mobilization by G-CSF does not improve infarct size, left ventricular function, or coronary restenosis in patients with AMI who have had successful mechanical reperfusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粒细胞集落刺激因子在急性心肌梗死中的干细胞动员:来自REVIVAL-2试验的教训。
实验研究和早期临床试验表明,粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员骨髓干细胞可用于改善急性心肌梗死(AMI)后心脏再生。为了更充分地评估这种干预对AMI患者的影响,我们进行了骨髓干细胞有力激活再生重要心肌(REVIVAL-2)临床试验。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗AMI成功再灌注后,患者被随机分配接受每日10微克/千克G-CSF皮下剂量或安慰剂,持续5天。用G-CSF处理产生了显著的干细胞动员。4-6个月后,通过锝-99标记的单光子发射CT测定,梗死面积从基线减少,G-CSF组和安慰剂组之间没有显著差异。此外,左心室射血分数的改善,通过后期增强MRI评估,在两组之间没有显着差异。G-CSF治疗不会增加不良临床事件的风险,也不会促进再狭窄。我们的试验表明,在机械再灌注成功的AMI患者中,G-CSF的干细胞动员并不能改善梗死面积、左心室功能或冠状动脉再狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Untranslated Promoter Regions for HLA Class I Genes. Prevalence of allergen sensitization in 1000 adults in Saskatchewan. Tinea pedis and onychomycosis frequency in diabetes mellitus patients and diabetic foot ulcers. A cross sectional - observational study. Imaging left ventricular remodeling: targeting the neurohumoral axis. Targeted imaging of myocardial damage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1