Comparison of the Diskus inhaler and the Handihaler regarding preference and ease of use.

Job Van Der Palen, Michiel M Eijsvogel, Bart F Kuipers, Maria Schipper, Niek A Vermue
{"title":"Comparison of the Diskus inhaler and the Handihaler regarding preference and ease of use.","authors":"Job Van Der Palen,&nbsp;Michiel M Eijsvogel,&nbsp;Bart F Kuipers,&nbsp;Maria Schipper,&nbsp;Niek A Vermue","doi":"10.1089/jam.2006.0565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients use their inhaler ineffectively and there is a trend towards increased inhaler resistance. We wanted to answer two questions: Is there a difference in preference and ease of use between Diskus (DK) and Handihaler (HH)? How acceptable are inhalation resistances? Sixty COPD patients, naive to DK and HH, but experienced in the use of other inhalers, had to read the instruction leaflet and demonstrate their inhalation technique. If errors were made, instruction was given and inhalation technique was checked again. Patients had to state a preference for DK or HH. Subsequently they inhaled through a range of resistances and scored the acceptability. There was no difference in the number of instructions needed for both inhalers. One third inhaled perfectly after reading the instruction leaflet, which increased to 85% after one instruction. More patients preferred the DK (43) than the HH (16). With decreasing resistance acceptability increases, but it reaches a plateau. Patients have a clear preference for the DK. There is no difference in the number of instructions needed to obtain a perfect inhalation technique, but for some patients one instruction is not enough. The trend to increase the resistance of inhalers has reached a critical point with regard to acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"38-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2006.0565","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2006.0565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Many chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients use their inhaler ineffectively and there is a trend towards increased inhaler resistance. We wanted to answer two questions: Is there a difference in preference and ease of use between Diskus (DK) and Handihaler (HH)? How acceptable are inhalation resistances? Sixty COPD patients, naive to DK and HH, but experienced in the use of other inhalers, had to read the instruction leaflet and demonstrate their inhalation technique. If errors were made, instruction was given and inhalation technique was checked again. Patients had to state a preference for DK or HH. Subsequently they inhaled through a range of resistances and scored the acceptability. There was no difference in the number of instructions needed for both inhalers. One third inhaled perfectly after reading the instruction leaflet, which increased to 85% after one instruction. More patients preferred the DK (43) than the HH (16). With decreasing resistance acceptability increases, but it reaches a plateau. Patients have a clear preference for the DK. There is no difference in the number of instructions needed to obtain a perfect inhalation technique, but for some patients one instruction is not enough. The trend to increase the resistance of inhalers has reached a critical point with regard to acceptability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diskus吸入器和Handihaler在偏好和易用性方面的比较。
许多慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者不能有效地使用吸入器,并且有吸入器耐药性增加的趋势。我们想要回答两个问题:Diskus (DK)和Handihaler (HH)在偏好和易用性上有区别吗?吸入阻力的可接受程度如何?60名COPD患者,未接触DK和HH,但有使用其他吸入器的经验,必须阅读说明书并演示其吸入技术。如果出现错误,给予指导并再次检查吸入技术。患者必须说明对DK或HH的偏好。随后,他们通过一系列阻力吸入并获得可接受性。两种吸入器所需的说明数量没有差异。三分之一的人在阅读说明书后完全吸入,在一次指导后增加到85%。更多的患者选择DK(43)而不是HH(16)。随着阻力的减小,可接受性增加,但达到平稳期。患者对DK有明显的偏好。获得完美的吸入技术所需的指导次数没有区别,但对一些患者来说,一次指导是不够的。增加吸入器阻力的趋势已达到可接受性的临界点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formoterol turbuhaler is as effective as salbutamol diskus in relieving adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in children. An in vitro study to assess facial and ocular deposition from Respimat Soft Mist inhaler. Exhaled breath condensate pH is increased after moderate exercise. The analysis and prediction of functional robustness of inhaler devices. Comparison of the Diskus inhaler and the Handihaler regarding preference and ease of use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1