Association between frequency of telephonic contact and clinical testing for a large, geographically diverse diabetes disease management population.

Carter R Coberley, Matthew McGinnis, Patty M Orr, Sadie S Coberley, Adam Hobgood, Brent Hamar, Bill Gandy, James Pope, Laurel Hudson, Pam Hara, Dexter Shurney, Janice L Clarke, Albert Crawford, Neil I Goldfarb
{"title":"Association between frequency of telephonic contact and clinical testing for a large, geographically diverse diabetes disease management population.","authors":"Carter R Coberley,&nbsp;Matthew McGinnis,&nbsp;Patty M Orr,&nbsp;Sadie S Coberley,&nbsp;Adam Hobgood,&nbsp;Brent Hamar,&nbsp;Bill Gandy,&nbsp;James Pope,&nbsp;Laurel Hudson,&nbsp;Pam Hara,&nbsp;Dexter Shurney,&nbsp;Janice L Clarke,&nbsp;Albert Crawford,&nbsp;Neil I Goldfarb","doi":"10.1089/dis.2006.632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes disease management (DM) programs strive to promote healthy behaviors, including obtaining hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) tests as part of standards of care. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between frequency of telephonic contact and A1c and LDL testing rates. A total of 245,668 members continuously enrolled in diabetes DM programs were evaluated for performance of an A1c or LDL test during their first 12 months in the programs. The association between the number of calls a member received and clinical testing rates was examined. Members who received four calls demonstrated a 24.1% and 21.5% relative increase in A1c and LDL testing rates, respectively, compared to members who received DM mailings alone. Response to the telephonic intervention as part of the diabetes DM programs was influenced by member characteristics including gender, age, and disease burden. For example, females who received four calls achieved a 27.7% and 23.6% increase in A1c and LDL testing, respectively, compared to females who received mailings alone; by comparison, males who were called achieved 21.2% and 19.9% relative increase in A1c and LDL testing, respectively, compared to those who received mailings alone. This study demonstrates a positive association between frequency of telephonic contact and increased performance of an A1c or LDL test in a large, diverse diabetes population participating in DM programs. The impact of member characteristics on the responsiveness to these programs provides DM program designers with knowledge for developing strategies to promote healthy behaviors and improve diabetes outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 2","pages":"101-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2006.632","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Management : Dm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2006.632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Diabetes disease management (DM) programs strive to promote healthy behaviors, including obtaining hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) tests as part of standards of care. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between frequency of telephonic contact and A1c and LDL testing rates. A total of 245,668 members continuously enrolled in diabetes DM programs were evaluated for performance of an A1c or LDL test during their first 12 months in the programs. The association between the number of calls a member received and clinical testing rates was examined. Members who received four calls demonstrated a 24.1% and 21.5% relative increase in A1c and LDL testing rates, respectively, compared to members who received DM mailings alone. Response to the telephonic intervention as part of the diabetes DM programs was influenced by member characteristics including gender, age, and disease burden. For example, females who received four calls achieved a 27.7% and 23.6% increase in A1c and LDL testing, respectively, compared to females who received mailings alone; by comparison, males who were called achieved 21.2% and 19.9% relative increase in A1c and LDL testing, respectively, compared to those who received mailings alone. This study demonstrates a positive association between frequency of telephonic contact and increased performance of an A1c or LDL test in a large, diverse diabetes population participating in DM programs. The impact of member characteristics on the responsiveness to these programs provides DM program designers with knowledge for developing strategies to promote healthy behaviors and improve diabetes outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电话接触频率与糖尿病疾病管理人群临床检测之间的关系。
糖尿病疾病管理(DM)项目努力促进健康行为,包括获得血红蛋白A1c (A1c)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)测试作为护理标准的一部分。本研究的目的是研究电话接触频率与A1c和LDL检测率之间的关系。共有245,668名连续参加糖尿病糖尿病项目的成员在项目的前12个月接受了A1c或LDL测试的评估。研究了成员接到的电话数量与临床测试率之间的关系。与只收到DM邮件的成员相比,收到4个电话的成员的A1c和LDL检测率分别增加了24.1%和21.5%。对电话干预作为糖尿病DM项目的一部分的反应受到成员特征的影响,包括性别、年龄和疾病负担。例如,与只收到邮件的雌性相比,接到四次电话的雌性的A1c和LDL检测分别增加了27.7%和23.6%;相比之下,与那些只收到邮件的男性相比,被打电话的男性的糖化血红蛋白和低密度脂蛋白检测分别相对增加了21.2%和19.9%。本研究表明,在参与糖尿病项目的大量不同糖尿病人群中,电话接触频率与A1c或LDL测试成绩的提高之间存在正相关。成员特征对这些计划的响应性的影响为糖尿病计划的设计者提供了制定促进健康行为和改善糖尿病结局的策略的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving medication adherence with a targeted, technology-driven disease management intervention. Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting. Where we've gone wrong. Disease management programs for the underserved. Co-occurring mental illness and health care utilization and expenditures in adults with obesity and chronic physical illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1