Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting.

Bruce W Bailey, Dennis J Jacobsen, Joseph E Donnelly
{"title":"Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting.","authors":"Bruce W Bailey,&nbsp;Dennis J Jacobsen,&nbsp;Joseph E Donnelly","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine if a formula diet of 520 kilocalorie (kcal, 2177 kilojoules [kJ]) compared to 850 kcal (3558 kJ) produces significantly greater weight loss and improved weight maintenance in a clinical outpatient setting. The investigation was a retrospective analysis of data from 1887 participants who underwent weight loss between December 1994 and January 2003. Participants were between the ages of 18 and 70 and completed a minimum of 12 weeks of a very-low-energy diet (VLED; 520 kcal) or a low-energy diet (LED; 850 kcal). Participants attended weekly meetings, were weighed, and received instruction in behavioral skills. Following active weight loss, participants transitioned to weight maintenance and were prescribed an individual structured meal plan aimed at maintaining body weight. Both levels of energy intake produced significant weight loss over 12 weeks (P < 0.05). Weight loss was 15.2 +/- 4.1% and 14.3 +/- 3.7% of initial body weight for participants in the VLED (n = 1231) and LED (n = 656), respectively. After controlling for baseline body weight, there was no significant difference between diets. Similarly, there was no significant difference in weight regain between VLED and LED after 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks of weight maintenance. VLED did not produce a greater weight loss than the LED. LED provides similar weight loss with a lower incidence of adverse events and diminished need for medical monitoring. We conclude LED is an efficacious, safe, and less burdensome diet compared to VLED.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 3","pages":"176-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.0002","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Management : Dm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if a formula diet of 520 kilocalorie (kcal, 2177 kilojoules [kJ]) compared to 850 kcal (3558 kJ) produces significantly greater weight loss and improved weight maintenance in a clinical outpatient setting. The investigation was a retrospective analysis of data from 1887 participants who underwent weight loss between December 1994 and January 2003. Participants were between the ages of 18 and 70 and completed a minimum of 12 weeks of a very-low-energy diet (VLED; 520 kcal) or a low-energy diet (LED; 850 kcal). Participants attended weekly meetings, were weighed, and received instruction in behavioral skills. Following active weight loss, participants transitioned to weight maintenance and were prescribed an individual structured meal plan aimed at maintaining body weight. Both levels of energy intake produced significant weight loss over 12 weeks (P < 0.05). Weight loss was 15.2 +/- 4.1% and 14.3 +/- 3.7% of initial body weight for participants in the VLED (n = 1231) and LED (n = 656), respectively. After controlling for baseline body weight, there was no significant difference between diets. Similarly, there was no significant difference in weight regain between VLED and LED after 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks of weight maintenance. VLED did not produce a greater weight loss than the LED. LED provides similar weight loss with a lower incidence of adverse events and diminished need for medical monitoring. We conclude LED is an efficacious, safe, and less burdensome diet compared to VLED.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在门诊环境中使用中度和重度热量限制的体重减轻和维持结果。
本研究的目的是确定在临床门诊环境中,520千卡(kcal, 2177千焦[kJ])的配方饮食与850千卡(3558千焦)的配方饮食是否能显著减轻体重并改善体重维持。这项调查是对1887名在1994年12月至2003年1月期间进行减肥的参与者的数据进行回顾性分析。参与者年龄在18到70岁之间,完成了至少12周的极低能量饮食(VLED;520千卡)或低能耗饮食(LED;850千卡)。参与者每周参加会议,称重,并接受行为技巧方面的指导。在积极减肥后,参与者过渡到维持体重,并制定了旨在维持体重的个人结构化膳食计划。两种能量摄入水平均在12周内显著减轻体重(P < 0.05)。VLED组(n = 1231)和LED组(n = 656)的参与者体重减轻分别为初始体重的15.2 +/- 4.1%和14.3 +/- 3.7%。在控制了基线体重后,饮食之间没有显著差异。同样,在体重维持12、24、36和48周后,VLED和LED之间的体重恢复没有显著差异。VLED并没有产生比LED更大的重量损失。LED提供类似的减肥效果,但不良事件发生率较低,减少了对医疗监测的需求。我们得出的结论是,与VLED相比,LED是一种有效、安全、负担更少的饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving medication adherence with a targeted, technology-driven disease management intervention. Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting. Where we've gone wrong. Disease management programs for the underserved. Co-occurring mental illness and health care utilization and expenditures in adults with obesity and chronic physical illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1