A cluster randomized clinical trial to improve prescribing patterns in ambulatory pediatrics.

Robert L Davis, Jeffrey Wright, Francie Chalmers, Linda Levenson, Julie C Brown, Paula Lozano, Dimitri A Christakis
{"title":"A cluster randomized clinical trial to improve prescribing patterns in ambulatory pediatrics.","authors":"Robert L Davis,&nbsp;Jeffrey Wright,&nbsp;Francie Chalmers,&nbsp;Linda Levenson,&nbsp;Julie C Brown,&nbsp;Paula Lozano,&nbsp;Dimitri A Christakis","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Having shown previously that an electronic prescription writer and decision support system improved pediatric prescribing behavior for otitis media in an academic clinic setting, we assessed whether point-of-care delivery of evidence could demonstrate similar effects for a wide range of other common pediatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cluster randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A teaching clinic/clinical practice site and a primary care pediatric clinic serving a rural and semi-urban patient mix.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 36 providers at the teaching clinic/practice site and eight providers at the private primary pediatric clinic.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>An evidence-based message system that presented real-time evidence to providers based on prescribing practices for acute otitis media, allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, constipation, pharyngitis, croup, urticaria, and bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The proportion of prescriptions dispensed in accordance with evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of prescriptions dispensed in accordance with evidence improved four percentage points, from 38% at baseline to 42% following the intervention. The control group improved by one percentage point, from 39% at baseline to 40% at trial's conclusion. The adjusted difference between the intervention and control groups was 8% (95% confidence interval 1%, 15%). Intervention effectiveness did not decrease with time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For common pediatric outpatient conditions, a point-of-care evidence-based prescription writer and decision support system was associated with significant improvements in prescribing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020025","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Objectives: Having shown previously that an electronic prescription writer and decision support system improved pediatric prescribing behavior for otitis media in an academic clinic setting, we assessed whether point-of-care delivery of evidence could demonstrate similar effects for a wide range of other common pediatric conditions.

Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial.

Setting: A teaching clinic/clinical practice site and a primary care pediatric clinic serving a rural and semi-urban patient mix.

Participants: A total of 36 providers at the teaching clinic/practice site and eight providers at the private primary pediatric clinic.

Intervention: An evidence-based message system that presented real-time evidence to providers based on prescribing practices for acute otitis media, allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, constipation, pharyngitis, croup, urticaria, and bronchiolitis.

Outcome measures: The proportion of prescriptions dispensed in accordance with evidence.

Results: The proportion of prescriptions dispensed in accordance with evidence improved four percentage points, from 38% at baseline to 42% following the intervention. The control group improved by one percentage point, from 39% at baseline to 40% at trial's conclusion. The adjusted difference between the intervention and control groups was 8% (95% confidence interval 1%, 15%). Intervention effectiveness did not decrease with time.

Conclusion: For common pediatric outpatient conditions, a point-of-care evidence-based prescription writer and decision support system was associated with significant improvements in prescribing practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项改善门诊儿科处方模式的随机临床试验。
目的:之前已经表明,在学术临床环境中,电子处方编写器和决策支持系统改善了儿童中耳炎的处方行为,我们评估了护理点提供证据是否可以对其他常见的儿童疾病表现出类似的效果。设计:整群随机对照试验。环境:一个教学诊所/临床实践场所和一个初级保健儿科诊所,为农村和半城市患者提供服务。参与者:教学诊所/实习点共有36名提供者,私立初级儿科诊所共有8名提供者。干预:一个基于证据的信息系统,根据急性中耳炎、过敏性鼻炎、鼻窦炎、便秘、咽炎、臀部、荨麻疹和细支气管炎的处方实践,向提供者提供实时证据。结果指标:根据证据开具处方的比例。结果:根据证据开具处方的比例提高了4个百分点,从基线时的38%提高到干预后的42%。对照组提高了一个百分点,从基线时的39%提高到试验结束时的40%。干预组和对照组之间的调整差异为8%(95%置信区间1%,15%)。干预效果没有随着时间的推移而降低。结论:对于常见的儿科门诊疾病,护理点循证处方制定者和决策支持系统与处方实践的显著改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials. A cluster-randomised trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for prevention of HIV infection in women: a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The effect of acclydine in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1