Marine algae: screening for a potent antibacterial agent.

Journal of herbal pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2007-01-01
Ratish Nair, Rajesh Chabhadiya, Sumitra Chanda
{"title":"Marine algae: screening for a potent antibacterial agent.","authors":"Ratish Nair,&nbsp;Rajesh Chabhadiya,&nbsp;Sumitra Chanda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was done to investigate the antimicrobial potentiality of the marine algae collected from different coastal regions of Gujarat and screened for the same. Twenty-six marine algae belonging to Rhodophyceae, Chlorophyceae and Phaeophyceae were screened for their potential antibacterial activity against five clinically important bacterial strains, namely Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus flavus, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas testosterone. Acetone and methanol were used for extraction; and the extracted yield was more when the solvent used was methanol. The antibacterial activity was done by both Agar disc diffusion method and Agar ditch method. The five bacterial strains showed varied response towards marine algal extracts. The most susceptible bacteria was B. cereus followed by K. pneumoniae and C. freundii while the most resistant bacteria were M. flavus and P. testosteroni. Among the 26 algae screened, E. intestinalis was the most potent alga and thus, this alga was selected for further studies. E. intestinalis was extracted in petroleum ether, 1,4-dioxan, acetone, methanol and DMF, and their antibacterial activity was studied against the above-stated five bacterial strains using agar disc method. Maximum extractive value of E. intestinalis was in methanol (2.05%) and minimum was in acetone (0.38%). The most susceptible bacteria was K. pneumoniae and maximum antibacterial activity was shown by petroleum ether extract and minimum was shown by 1,4-dioxan extract. The most resistant bacteria were M. flavus and C. freundii. The MIC values of E. intestinalis extracts ranged from 2500-9.765 microg/0.5 ml against B. cereus and K. pneumoniae. From these results it is concluded that the acetone extract of E. intestinalis is the most potent extract and can be used as a lead molecule in drug discovery in inhibiting some of the bacterial strains. E. intestinalis can be used as a promising novel marine antimicrobial agent in the coming years.</p>","PeriodicalId":73776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of herbal pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of herbal pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was done to investigate the antimicrobial potentiality of the marine algae collected from different coastal regions of Gujarat and screened for the same. Twenty-six marine algae belonging to Rhodophyceae, Chlorophyceae and Phaeophyceae were screened for their potential antibacterial activity against five clinically important bacterial strains, namely Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus flavus, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas testosterone. Acetone and methanol were used for extraction; and the extracted yield was more when the solvent used was methanol. The antibacterial activity was done by both Agar disc diffusion method and Agar ditch method. The five bacterial strains showed varied response towards marine algal extracts. The most susceptible bacteria was B. cereus followed by K. pneumoniae and C. freundii while the most resistant bacteria were M. flavus and P. testosteroni. Among the 26 algae screened, E. intestinalis was the most potent alga and thus, this alga was selected for further studies. E. intestinalis was extracted in petroleum ether, 1,4-dioxan, acetone, methanol and DMF, and their antibacterial activity was studied against the above-stated five bacterial strains using agar disc method. Maximum extractive value of E. intestinalis was in methanol (2.05%) and minimum was in acetone (0.38%). The most susceptible bacteria was K. pneumoniae and maximum antibacterial activity was shown by petroleum ether extract and minimum was shown by 1,4-dioxan extract. The most resistant bacteria were M. flavus and C. freundii. The MIC values of E. intestinalis extracts ranged from 2500-9.765 microg/0.5 ml against B. cereus and K. pneumoniae. From these results it is concluded that the acetone extract of E. intestinalis is the most potent extract and can be used as a lead molecule in drug discovery in inhibiting some of the bacterial strains. E. intestinalis can be used as a promising novel marine antimicrobial agent in the coming years.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海藻:筛选一种有效的抗菌剂。
本研究旨在研究从古吉拉特邦不同沿海地区采集的海藻的抗菌潜力,并对其进行筛选。筛选了红藻科、绿藻科和褐藻科共26种海藻,对蜡样芽孢杆菌、黄微球菌、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和睾酮假单胞菌5种临床重要菌株的潜在抑菌活性进行了研究。丙酮和甲醇萃取;以甲醇为溶剂时提取率较高。采用琼脂盘扩散法和琼脂沟法测定了其抑菌活性。5株细菌对海藻提取物的反应各不相同。最敏感的细菌是蜡样芽孢杆菌,其次是肺炎克雷伯菌和弗氏梭菌,最耐药的细菌是黄分枝杆菌和睾酮假单胞菌。在筛选的26种藻类中,大肠杆菌是最强的藻类,因此选择该藻类作为进一步研究的对象。以石油醚、1,4-二恶烷、丙酮、甲醇和DMF为溶剂提取大肠杆菌,采用琼脂盘法研究其对上述5种细菌的抑菌活性。甲醇提取量最高(2.05%),丙酮提取量最低(0.38%)。石油醚提取物的抑菌活性最高,1,4-二恶辛提取物的抑菌活性最低。耐药菌主要为黄分枝杆菌和弗氏胞杆菌。大肠杆菌提取物对蜡样芽孢杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的MIC值为2500 ~ 9.765 μ g/0.5 ml。综上所述,大肠杆菌丙酮提取物是最有效的提取物,可作为药物开发的先导分子,对某些菌株具有抑制作用。肠球菌是一种很有前途的新型海洋抗菌剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: 13th Annual Symposium on Complementary Health Care Effect of Methanolic Extract of Dendrophthoe falcata Stem on Reproductive Function of Male Albino Rats Elemental Characterization of Trifala Powders and Tablets by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis, Thermal Analysis and Spectral Studies of Gallic Acid Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of the Isomeric Mixture of Alpha- and Beta-Amyrin from Protium heptaphyllum(Aubl.) March In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Three Piper Species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1