Evaluation of a medicaid asthma disease management program.

Ariel Linden, Gregory D Berg, Sandeep Wadhwa
{"title":"Evaluation of a medicaid asthma disease management program.","authors":"Ariel Linden,&nbsp;Gregory D Berg,&nbsp;Sandeep Wadhwa","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.105711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates 1-year outcomes of an asthma disease management program implemented in an Oregon Medicaid population. A non-randomized pre-post study, a matched case-control study, and a \"programmatic effects\" analysis were conducted. Compared to matched controls, the treatment cohort had significantly fewer emergency room visits per thousand (7 vs. 28, P < 0.001) and higher office visits per thousand (57 vs. 7, P < 0.0001) but no significant difference in hospital admission rates. The programmatic effects model identified the participants' initial severity levels and the number of various communications they received as the most important variables in explaining the change in asthma severity from baseline to 12 months. These findings are supportive of the DM design, which is to reduce acute services by improving coordination of care between patients and their providers. Additionally, it appears that there is a close association between the number of patient contacts and their subsequent change in health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 5","pages":"266-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.105711","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Management : Dm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.105711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This study evaluates 1-year outcomes of an asthma disease management program implemented in an Oregon Medicaid population. A non-randomized pre-post study, a matched case-control study, and a "programmatic effects" analysis were conducted. Compared to matched controls, the treatment cohort had significantly fewer emergency room visits per thousand (7 vs. 28, P < 0.001) and higher office visits per thousand (57 vs. 7, P < 0.0001) but no significant difference in hospital admission rates. The programmatic effects model identified the participants' initial severity levels and the number of various communications they received as the most important variables in explaining the change in asthma severity from baseline to 12 months. These findings are supportive of the DM design, which is to reduce acute services by improving coordination of care between patients and their providers. Additionally, it appears that there is a close association between the number of patient contacts and their subsequent change in health status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医疗补助哮喘疾病管理计划。
本研究评估了在俄勒冈州医疗补助人群中实施的哮喘疾病管理项目的1年结果。进行了一项非随机的前后研究、一项匹配的病例对照研究和一项“程序性效应”分析。与匹配的对照组相比,治疗组每千人急诊室就诊次数明显减少(7比28,P < 0.001),每千人办公室就诊次数明显增加(57比7,P < 0.0001),但住院率无显著差异。规划效应模型确定了参与者的初始严重程度和他们收到的各种通信的数量,作为解释从基线到12个月哮喘严重程度变化的最重要变量。这些发现支持DM设计,即通过改善患者和提供者之间的护理协调来减少急性服务。此外,患者接触人数与其随后的健康状况变化之间似乎存在密切关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving medication adherence with a targeted, technology-driven disease management intervention. Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting. Where we've gone wrong. Disease management programs for the underserved. Co-occurring mental illness and health care utilization and expenditures in adults with obesity and chronic physical illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1