An initial analysis of the research competency level of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK)'s Divisional Research Contacts. An in-house survey.

Kenneth A Eaton, Amrita Narain, Paul Batchelor
{"title":"An initial analysis of the research competency level of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK)'s Divisional Research Contacts. An in-house survey.","authors":"Kenneth A Eaton,&nbsp;Amrita Narain,&nbsp;Paul Batchelor","doi":"10.1308/135576108784000212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this survey was to identify the current level of competence of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK)'s [FGDP(UK)'s] Divisional Research Contacts (DRCs).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The FGDP(UK)'s DRCs were each sent a copy the Faculty's Research Competencies Framework (RCF). A mutually convenient time for a telephone interview was then agreed between the DRCs and one of the Faculty's two National Research Facilitators. During the interview, a structured questionnaire was used and the DRCs' qualifications and research experience were recorded along with their perceived knowledge and skill levels for each of the 21 competencies in the RCF, using a five-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen of the 20 DRCs were interviewed, of whom 12 either possessed or were studying for higher research or partresearch degrees (PhD or MSc). All had some previous research experience. For 11 of the 15 competencies in the four domains of practical skills, problem-solving, attitudes and dissemination, DRCs rated their knowledge and skills levels as average or higher. For two of these 11 competencies (communication skills and understanding the need for research to support clinical practice), all 18 DRCs rated their levels of knowledge and skills as good or excellent. In the domain of roles and functions, DRCs rated their levels of knowledge and skills at a lower level. Seven rated their competence in designing and implementing a series of studies that address a significant issue and in writing research funding applications to major bodies as poor or very poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present survey has provided the basis for a future, in-depth training needs analysis along with an insight into the research competency level of 18 of the Faculty's 20 DRCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":79454,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","volume":"15 2","pages":"71-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576108784000212","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576108784000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this survey was to identify the current level of competence of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK)'s [FGDP(UK)'s] Divisional Research Contacts (DRCs).

Methodology: The FGDP(UK)'s DRCs were each sent a copy the Faculty's Research Competencies Framework (RCF). A mutually convenient time for a telephone interview was then agreed between the DRCs and one of the Faculty's two National Research Facilitators. During the interview, a structured questionnaire was used and the DRCs' qualifications and research experience were recorded along with their perceived knowledge and skill levels for each of the 21 competencies in the RCF, using a five-point Likert scale.

Results: Eighteen of the 20 DRCs were interviewed, of whom 12 either possessed or were studying for higher research or partresearch degrees (PhD or MSc). All had some previous research experience. For 11 of the 15 competencies in the four domains of practical skills, problem-solving, attitudes and dissemination, DRCs rated their knowledge and skills levels as average or higher. For two of these 11 competencies (communication skills and understanding the need for research to support clinical practice), all 18 DRCs rated their levels of knowledge and skills as good or excellent. In the domain of roles and functions, DRCs rated their levels of knowledge and skills at a lower level. Seven rated their competence in designing and implementing a series of studies that address a significant issue and in writing research funding applications to major bodies as poor or very poor.

Conclusions: The present survey has provided the basis for a future, in-depth training needs analysis along with an insight into the research competency level of 18 of the Faculty's 20 DRCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般牙科实践学院(英国)的部门研究接触的研究能力水平的初步分析。内部调查。
目的:本调查的目的是确定普通牙科实践学院(英国)[FGDP(英国)]部门研究联系人(drc)的当前能力水平。方法:FGDP(英国)的drc每人收到一份学院研究能力框架(RCF)的副本。然后在drc和学院的两个国家研究协调员之一之间商定了一个双方方便的电话采访时间。在访谈过程中,使用了一份结构化问卷,并使用五分制李克特量表记录了研究人员的资格和研究经验,以及他们对RCF中21项能力中的每项能力的感知知识和技能水平。结果:20个drc中有18个接受了采访,其中12个拥有或正在攻读更高的研究或合作研究学位(博士或硕士)。他们之前都有一些研究经验。在实践技能、解决问题、态度和传播四个领域的15项能力中,有11项能力,发展中国家将其知识和技能水平评为平均或更高。对于这11项能力中的两项(沟通技能和理解研究支持临床实践的必要性),所有18个国家都将其知识和技能水平评为良好或优秀。在角色和职能领域,drc将其知识和技能水平评定为较低水平。七名学生认为他们在设计和实施一系列解决重大问题的研究以及为主要机构撰写研究经费申请方面的能力差或非常差。结论:目前的调查为未来深入的培训需求分析以及对学院20个drc中18个研究能力水平的洞察提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) at 20 years. A patient's view of dentistry 20 years ago, now, and in 20 years' time. Primary Dental Care: past, present and future. Primary dental care: time to revise the definition? Prim Dent Care 2000. 7(3):93-96. Dental specialist lists: are they necessary?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1