Dental specialist lists: are they necessary?

Roger Mosedale, Paul Batchelor
{"title":"Dental specialist lists: are they necessary?","authors":"Roger Mosedale,&nbsp;Paul Batchelor","doi":"10.1308/135576112802092260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is usual to hold debates with a live audience. However, they can be held via the written word. Indeed, Letters to the Editor and responses are in many ways a debate. Specialist lists were introduced by the General Dental Council in 1997 and have been discussed ever since. This discussion will doubtless continue for many years. Two longstanding Faculty members have strong views on the topic. They were therefore invited to conduct a written debate to mark the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":79454,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","volume":"19 3","pages":"111-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576112802092260","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576112802092260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is usual to hold debates with a live audience. However, they can be held via the written word. Indeed, Letters to the Editor and responses are in many ways a debate. Specialist lists were introduced by the General Dental Council in 1997 and have been discussed ever since. This discussion will doubtless continue for many years. Two longstanding Faculty members have strong views on the topic. They were therefore invited to conduct a written debate to mark the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Faculty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科专家名单:有必要吗?
与现场观众进行辩论是很常见的。然而,他们可以通过书面文字来举行。的确,《致编辑的信》及其回应在很多方面都是一场辩论。专家名单是由牙科管理委员会于1997年推出,并一直讨论至今。这种讨论无疑将持续许多年。两位资深教员对这个话题有强烈的看法。因此,他们被邀请进行一场书面辩论,以纪念该学院成立20周年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) at 20 years. A patient's view of dentistry 20 years ago, now, and in 20 years' time. Primary Dental Care: past, present and future. Primary dental care: time to revise the definition? Prim Dent Care 2000. 7(3):93-96. Dental specialist lists: are they necessary?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1