Regression to the mean: a limited issue in disease management programs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

David Tinkelman, Steve Wilson
{"title":"Regression to the mean: a limited issue in disease management programs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"David Tinkelman,&nbsp;Steve Wilson","doi":"10.1089/dis.2008.112729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to test for evidence of regression to the mean in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related health care utilization in a Colorado Medicaid population that met the criteria for, but were not participating in, a COPD disease management (DM) program. National Jewish Medical and Research Center had enrolled individuals who (1) had a diagnosis of COPD for at least 1 year and (2) were active participants in Colorado Medicaid's 1-year DM program called breatheWise; the present study sought a comparator group for that population. In order to test for evidence of regression to the mean (ie, high utilization from the recruitment period reducing without active intervention) in this case management model, we conducted a case-controlled analysis of total spending for a comparator population that would have met the inclusion criteria for the DM program. The present study assessed health care utilization for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 in terms of total rates of emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations for all causes in the comparator group of COPD patients. In addition, total costs related to both ER visits and hospitalizations were compiled. In total, 354 individuals met the inclusion criteria and were identified as the comparator group. ER visits and hospitalizations were consistent for 2002 and 2003. ER visits totaled 314 and 315 in 2002 and 2003, respectively, indicating a 0.3% increase that was not significant. Hospitalizations decreased from 0.53 admissions per patient in 2002 to 0.48 in 2003-a 9.4% reduction that was not significant. With comparable rates of ER visits and hospitalizations, total costs for health care utilization remained virtually unchanged between 2002 and 2003. There is minimal evidence of regression to the mean over 2 consecutive years in the Colorado Medicaid patients with moderate to severe COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 2","pages":"103-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.112729","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Management : Dm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.112729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Our objective was to test for evidence of regression to the mean in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related health care utilization in a Colorado Medicaid population that met the criteria for, but were not participating in, a COPD disease management (DM) program. National Jewish Medical and Research Center had enrolled individuals who (1) had a diagnosis of COPD for at least 1 year and (2) were active participants in Colorado Medicaid's 1-year DM program called breatheWise; the present study sought a comparator group for that population. In order to test for evidence of regression to the mean (ie, high utilization from the recruitment period reducing without active intervention) in this case management model, we conducted a case-controlled analysis of total spending for a comparator population that would have met the inclusion criteria for the DM program. The present study assessed health care utilization for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 in terms of total rates of emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations for all causes in the comparator group of COPD patients. In addition, total costs related to both ER visits and hospitalizations were compiled. In total, 354 individuals met the inclusion criteria and were identified as the comparator group. ER visits and hospitalizations were consistent for 2002 and 2003. ER visits totaled 314 and 315 in 2002 and 2003, respectively, indicating a 0.3% increase that was not significant. Hospitalizations decreased from 0.53 admissions per patient in 2002 to 0.48 in 2003-a 9.4% reduction that was not significant. With comparable rates of ER visits and hospitalizations, total costs for health care utilization remained virtually unchanged between 2002 and 2003. There is minimal evidence of regression to the mean over 2 consecutive years in the Colorado Medicaid patients with moderate to severe COPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回归均值:慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理方案中的一个有限问题。
我们的目的是检验在符合慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理(DM)计划标准但未参与的科罗拉多州医疗补助人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)相关医疗保健利用率回归均值的证据。国家犹太医学和研究中心招募了(1)被诊断患有慢性阻塞性肺病至少1年的个体,(2)积极参与科罗拉多州医疗补助计划的1年糖尿病项目,称为breatheWise;本研究为这一人群寻找一个比较组。为了检验该病例管理模型中回归均值的证据(即,招募期的高利用率在没有积极干预的情况下降低),我们对符合DM项目纳入标准的比较人群的总支出进行了病例对照分析。本研究根据比较组COPD患者急诊室(ER)就诊和各种原因住院的总比率评估了2002和2003财政年度的医疗保健利用情况。此外,还编制了与急诊室就诊和住院有关的总费用。共有354人符合纳入标准,并被确定为比较组。2002年和2003年的急诊室就诊和住院率是一致的。2002年和2003年的急诊人次分别为314人次和315人次,增幅为0.3%,增幅并不显著。住院率从2002年的每名患者0.53次下降到2003年的0.48次,减少了9.4%,但并不显著。在2002年至2003年期间,急诊室就诊率和住院率相当,医疗保健利用的总成本几乎没有变化。在科罗拉多州接受医疗补助的中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,有最小的证据表明在连续2年内回归到平均值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving medication adherence with a targeted, technology-driven disease management intervention. Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting. Where we've gone wrong. Disease management programs for the underserved. Co-occurring mental illness and health care utilization and expenditures in adults with obesity and chronic physical illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1