Early effects of treatment with nebivolol and quinapril on endothelial function in patients with hypertension.

Hasan Korkmaz, Ilgin Karaca, Mustafa Koç, Orhan Onalan, Mücahit Yilmaz, Mehmet Nail Bilen
{"title":"Early effects of treatment with nebivolol and quinapril on endothelial function in patients with hypertension.","authors":"Hasan Korkmaz,&nbsp;Ilgin Karaca,&nbsp;Mustafa Koç,&nbsp;Orhan Onalan,&nbsp;Mücahit Yilmaz,&nbsp;Mehmet Nail Bilen","doi":"10.1080/10623320802125565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the present study was to compare the early effects of treatment with nebivolol and quinapril on the endothelial function in hypertensive patients. A total of 54 hypertensive patients was enrolled in the present study. One of the groups (n = 27) received quinapril 20 mg/day, and the other group (n = 27) received nebivolol 5 mg/day for a period of 4 weeks. The endothelial dysfunction was assessed using FMD (flow-mediated vasodilation) of the brachial arteries. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar in age, gender, left venticular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, and body mass index. No significant difference was also found between the groups in the distribution of atherosclerotic risk factors as well as other echocardiographic, demographic, and biochemical measurements. Although the reduction of diastolic blood pressure was more pronounced in the nebivolol group after a 4-week treatment, the change in the systolic blood pressure was found to be similar in both treatment arms. Although a statistically nonsignificant increase was observed in flow-mediated vasodilation in the quinapril group (4.77% +/- 3.92%, 5.60% +/- 6.18%; p = .587), the increase in the post-treatment FMD was statistically significant in the nebivolol group (3.78% +/- 4.25%, 8.56% +/- 6.39%; p = .002). A significant change was observed in the resistive index value following flow-mediated vasodilation for both groups after treatment (p = .043; p = .027), whereas the change in the value of flow volume was significant only in the nebivolol group (p = .019).</p>","PeriodicalId":11587,"journal":{"name":"Endothelium : journal of endothelial cell research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10623320802125565","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endothelium : journal of endothelial cell research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10623320802125565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare the early effects of treatment with nebivolol and quinapril on the endothelial function in hypertensive patients. A total of 54 hypertensive patients was enrolled in the present study. One of the groups (n = 27) received quinapril 20 mg/day, and the other group (n = 27) received nebivolol 5 mg/day for a period of 4 weeks. The endothelial dysfunction was assessed using FMD (flow-mediated vasodilation) of the brachial arteries. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar in age, gender, left venticular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, and body mass index. No significant difference was also found between the groups in the distribution of atherosclerotic risk factors as well as other echocardiographic, demographic, and biochemical measurements. Although the reduction of diastolic blood pressure was more pronounced in the nebivolol group after a 4-week treatment, the change in the systolic blood pressure was found to be similar in both treatment arms. Although a statistically nonsignificant increase was observed in flow-mediated vasodilation in the quinapril group (4.77% +/- 3.92%, 5.60% +/- 6.18%; p = .587), the increase in the post-treatment FMD was statistically significant in the nebivolol group (3.78% +/- 4.25%, 8.56% +/- 6.39%; p = .002). A significant change was observed in the resistive index value following flow-mediated vasodilation for both groups after treatment (p = .043; p = .027), whereas the change in the value of flow volume was significant only in the nebivolol group (p = .019).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奈比洛尔和喹普利治疗对高血压患者内皮功能的早期影响。
本研究的目的是比较奈比洛尔和喹普利治疗对高血压患者内皮功能的早期影响。本研究共纳入54例高血压患者。其中一组(n = 27)接受喹那普利20 mg/天,另一组(n = 27)接受奈比洛尔5 mg/天,为期4周。采用肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)评估内皮功能障碍。两组的基线特征在年龄、性别、左心室射血分数、左心室质量指数和体重指数方面相似。在动脉粥样硬化危险因素的分布以及其他超声心动图、人口统计学和生化测量方面,两组之间也没有发现显著差异。虽然在治疗4周后,纳比洛尔组的舒张压降低更为明显,但发现两个治疗组的收缩压变化相似。尽管喹普利组血流介导的血管舒张无统计学意义的增加(4.77% +/- 3.92%,5.60% +/- 6.18%;p = .587),奈比洛尔组治疗后FMD升高有统计学意义(3.78% +/- 4.25%,8.56% +/- 6.39%;P = .002)。两组治疗后血流介导的血管舒张后的阻力指数值均有显著变化(p = 0.043;P = 0.027),而只有纳比沃洛尔组的流量值变化显著(P = 0.019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy of endothelial cells grown in three-dimensional matrigel construct as an enabling platform technology: I. The effect of glial cells and valproic acid on phosphometabolite levels. 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy of endothelial cells grown in three-dimensional matrigel constructs as an enabling platform technology: II. The effect of anti-inflammatory drugs on phosphometabolite levels. Interaction of estrogen and tumor necrosis factor alpha in endothelial cell migration and early stage of angiogenesis. Endothelial progenitor cells in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. Effects of two complex hemodynamic stimulation profiles on hemostatic genes in a vessel-like environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1