Risk-based regulatory system and its effective use in health and social care.

Mahmood Adil
{"title":"Risk-based regulatory system and its effective use in health and social care.","authors":"Mahmood Adil","doi":"10.1177/1466424008092234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The regulatory landscape of the health and adult social care system in England is constantly changing. The establishment of a new regulator, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), will help to integrate the regulation of the health and adult social care sector together and strengthen the safety and quality assurance for patients and service users. It will have the challenge of regulating a much bigger sector and wider variety of organizations than its predecessor bodies--i.e. Healthcare Commission, Commission for Social Care Inspection and Mental Health Act Commission. An effective and efficient regulatory approach is needed by the new regulator to achieve the objectives, without increasing the regulatory burden on the services. A risk-based regulatory approach may help to deal with those challenges by proactively identifying and assessing any key risks to the quality and safety of these services. There are a number of perceived benefits of adapting such a risk-based approach by the regulator, both in terms of effectiveness and efficiency, as experienced by many other regulators in the UK and abroad.</p>","PeriodicalId":22790,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","volume":"128 4","pages":"196-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1466424008092234","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424008092234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The regulatory landscape of the health and adult social care system in England is constantly changing. The establishment of a new regulator, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), will help to integrate the regulation of the health and adult social care sector together and strengthen the safety and quality assurance for patients and service users. It will have the challenge of regulating a much bigger sector and wider variety of organizations than its predecessor bodies--i.e. Healthcare Commission, Commission for Social Care Inspection and Mental Health Act Commission. An effective and efficient regulatory approach is needed by the new regulator to achieve the objectives, without increasing the regulatory burden on the services. A risk-based regulatory approach may help to deal with those challenges by proactively identifying and assessing any key risks to the quality and safety of these services. There are a number of perceived benefits of adapting such a risk-based approach by the regulator, both in terms of effectiveness and efficiency, as experienced by many other regulators in the UK and abroad.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险的监管体系及其在卫生和社会保健中的有效利用。
在英格兰,健康和成人社会保健系统的监管格局不断变化。设立一个新的监管机构,即护理质量委员会(CQC),将有助于将卫生和成人社会护理部门的监管整合在一起,并加强对患者和服务使用者的安全和质量保证。它将面临的挑战是监管一个比其前身机构更大的部门和更广泛的组织。医疗保健委员会、社会关怀检查委员会和精神卫生法委员会。新的监管机构需要一种有效和高效的监管方法,以实现这些目标,同时又不会增加服务的监管负担。基于风险的监管方法可以通过主动识别和评估这些服务质量和安全的任何关键风险来帮助应对这些挑战。根据英国和国外许多其他监管机构的经验,监管机构采用这种基于风险的方法在有效性和效率方面都有许多明显的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trust me I'm a doctor (or an art therapist or a biomedical scientist or a chiropodist .....). Policy and politics. Will new regulations reverse the 'drop' in homeopathy? The number of people buying medicine online. Regulating the health and social care sector--are we getting there?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1