Use of and attitudes towards the prescribing guidelines booklet in primary health care doctors.

Magnus A B Axelsson, Malin Spetz, Anders Mellén, Susanna M Wallerstedt
{"title":"Use of and attitudes towards the prescribing guidelines booklet in primary health care doctors.","authors":"Magnus A B Axelsson,&nbsp;Malin Spetz,&nbsp;Anders Mellén,&nbsp;Susanna M Wallerstedt","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-8-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the region of Västra Götaland in Sweden, prescribing guidelines, drawn up by 24 expert groups and determined by the regional board for drugs, are since 2006 available in the form of an annually published booklet. This study investigates, for the first time, the use of and attitudes towards this publication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was administered to doctors working in primary health care in the region of Västra Götaland in Sweden. Questions included characteristics of the responding doctor and use of the prescribing guidelines booklet, as well as attitude questions constructed as statements to which the responder should grade his level of agreement from 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 603 filled-in questionnaires were returned (estimated response rate 60%). The majority of the doctors (n = 571, 97%) responded that they use the prescribing guidelines booklet, and when prescribing a drug for a new diagnosis, a drug from the booklet is chosen in most cases [median (25th - 75th percentile) 80 (75-90)]. However, at renewal of a drug prescription, active change to a drug from the prescribing guidelines booklet occurs less often [median (25th - 75th percentile) 50 (20-70)]. The booklet also includes short therapy advice sections, which 231 doctors (42%) use every day and 191 (34%) use every week. The attitudes towards the prescribing guidelines booklet were generally positive. Doctors in privately run primary health care units and doctors running their own business were generally more negative and judged themselves to be less adherent to the prescribing guidelines booklet compared with doctors in publicly run primary health care units.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prescribing guidelines booklet is frequently used and is generally appreciated, though differences exist between subgroups of users.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"8 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-8-8","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-8-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: In the region of Västra Götaland in Sweden, prescribing guidelines, drawn up by 24 expert groups and determined by the regional board for drugs, are since 2006 available in the form of an annually published booklet. This study investigates, for the first time, the use of and attitudes towards this publication.

Methods: A questionnaire was administered to doctors working in primary health care in the region of Västra Götaland in Sweden. Questions included characteristics of the responding doctor and use of the prescribing guidelines booklet, as well as attitude questions constructed as statements to which the responder should grade his level of agreement from 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement).

Results: Totally 603 filled-in questionnaires were returned (estimated response rate 60%). The majority of the doctors (n = 571, 97%) responded that they use the prescribing guidelines booklet, and when prescribing a drug for a new diagnosis, a drug from the booklet is chosen in most cases [median (25th - 75th percentile) 80 (75-90)]. However, at renewal of a drug prescription, active change to a drug from the prescribing guidelines booklet occurs less often [median (25th - 75th percentile) 50 (20-70)]. The booklet also includes short therapy advice sections, which 231 doctors (42%) use every day and 191 (34%) use every week. The attitudes towards the prescribing guidelines booklet were generally positive. Doctors in privately run primary health care units and doctors running their own business were generally more negative and judged themselves to be less adherent to the prescribing guidelines booklet compared with doctors in publicly run primary health care units.

Conclusion: The prescribing guidelines booklet is frequently used and is generally appreciated, though differences exist between subgroups of users.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健医生对处方指南小册子的使用和态度。
背景:在瑞典Västra Götaland区域,自2006年以来,由24个专家组起草并由区域药品委员会确定的处方准则以每年出版的小册子的形式提供。本研究首次调查了对该出版物的使用和态度。方法:对瑞典Västra Götaland地区从事初级卫生保健工作的医生进行问卷调查。问题包括回答医生的特征和处方指南小册子的使用,以及态度问题,回答者应该将他的同意等级从1(完全不同意)到6(完全同意)构建为陈述。结果:共回收问卷603份,估计回复率为60%。大多数医生(n = 571,97%)回答他们使用处方指南手册,并且在为新诊断开药时,大多数情况下会选择手册中的药物[中位数(25 - 75百分位数)80(75-90)]。然而,在更新药物处方时,从处方指南手册中主动改变药物的情况较少[中位数(25 - 75百分位数)50(20-70)]。该手册还包括简短的治疗建议部分,231名医生(42%)每天使用,191名医生(34%)每周使用。对处方指南小册子的态度普遍是积极的。私人开办的初级保健单位的医生和自营企业的医生普遍比较消极,与公立开办的初级保健单位的医生相比,他们认为自己不太遵守处方指南小册子。结论:处方指南手册使用频次高,普遍受欢迎,但不同用户群体间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statin therapy in critical illness: an international survey of intensive care physicians' opinions, attitudes and practice. Correction: Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy (ARVs): incidence, type and risk factors in Nigeria Data for drugs available through low-cost prescription drug programs are available through pharmacy benefit manager and claims data. Population prevalence of high dose paracetamol in dispensed paracetamol/opioid prescription combinations: an observational study. Adherence to medication for the treatment of psychosis: rates and risk factors in an Ethiopian population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1