Statin therapy in critical illness: an international survey of intensive care physicians' opinions, attitudes and practice.

Manu Shankar-Hari, Peter S Kruger, Stefania Di Gangi, Damon C Scales, Gavin D Perkins, Danny F McAuley, Marius Terblanche
{"title":"Statin therapy in critical illness: an international survey of intensive care physicians' opinions, attitudes and practice.","authors":"Manu Shankar-Hari,&nbsp;Peter S Kruger,&nbsp;Stefania Di Gangi,&nbsp;Damon C Scales,&nbsp;Gavin D Perkins,&nbsp;Danny F McAuley,&nbsp;Marius Terblanche","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-12-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pleotropic effects of statins on inflammation are hypothesised to attenuate the severity of and possibly prevent the occurrence of the host inflammatory response to pathogen and infection-related acute organ failure. We conducted an international survey of intensive care physicians in Australia, New Zealand (ANZ) and United Kingdom (UK). The aims of the survey were to assess the current prescribing practice patterns, attitudes towards prescribing statin therapy in critically ill patients and opinions on the need for an interventional trial of statin therapy in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey questions were developed through an iterative process. An expert group reviewed the resulting 26 items for face and content validity and clarity. The questions were further refined following pilot testing by ICU physicians from Australia, Canada and the UK. We used the online Smart SurveyTM software to administer the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 239 respondents (62 from ANZ and 177 from UK) 58% worked in teaching hospitals; most (78.2%) practised in 'closed' units with a mixed medical and surgical case mix (71.0%). The most frequently prescribed statins were simvastatin (77.6%) in the UK and atorvastatin (66.1%) in ANZ. The main reasons cited to explain the choice of statin were preadmission prescription and pharmacy availability. Most respondents reported never starting statins to prevent (65.3%) or treat (89.1%) organ dysfunction. Only a minority (10%) disagreed with a statement that the risks of major side effects of statins when prescribed in critically ill patients were low. The majority (84.5%) of respondents strongly agreed that a clinical trial of statins for prevention is needed. More than half (56.5%) favoured rates of organ failure as the primary outcome for such a trial, while a minority (40.6%) favoured mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite differences in type of statins prescribed, critical care physicians in the UK and ANZ reported similar prescription practices. Respondents from both communities agreed that a trial is needed to test whether statins can prevent the onset of new organ failure in patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"12 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-12-13","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-12-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Pleotropic effects of statins on inflammation are hypothesised to attenuate the severity of and possibly prevent the occurrence of the host inflammatory response to pathogen and infection-related acute organ failure. We conducted an international survey of intensive care physicians in Australia, New Zealand (ANZ) and United Kingdom (UK). The aims of the survey were to assess the current prescribing practice patterns, attitudes towards prescribing statin therapy in critically ill patients and opinions on the need for an interventional trial of statin therapy in critically ill patients.

Methods: Survey questions were developed through an iterative process. An expert group reviewed the resulting 26 items for face and content validity and clarity. The questions were further refined following pilot testing by ICU physicians from Australia, Canada and the UK. We used the online Smart SurveyTM software to administer the survey.

Results: Of 239 respondents (62 from ANZ and 177 from UK) 58% worked in teaching hospitals; most (78.2%) practised in 'closed' units with a mixed medical and surgical case mix (71.0%). The most frequently prescribed statins were simvastatin (77.6%) in the UK and atorvastatin (66.1%) in ANZ. The main reasons cited to explain the choice of statin were preadmission prescription and pharmacy availability. Most respondents reported never starting statins to prevent (65.3%) or treat (89.1%) organ dysfunction. Only a minority (10%) disagreed with a statement that the risks of major side effects of statins when prescribed in critically ill patients were low. The majority (84.5%) of respondents strongly agreed that a clinical trial of statins for prevention is needed. More than half (56.5%) favoured rates of organ failure as the primary outcome for such a trial, while a minority (40.6%) favoured mortality.

Conclusions: Despite differences in type of statins prescribed, critical care physicians in the UK and ANZ reported similar prescription practices. Respondents from both communities agreed that a trial is needed to test whether statins can prevent the onset of new organ failure in patients with sepsis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他汀类药物治疗危重疾病:重症监护医生意见、态度和实践的国际调查。
背景:他汀类药物对炎症的多效性作用被假设可以减轻宿主对病原体和感染相关急性器官衰竭的炎症反应的严重程度,并可能预防宿主炎症反应的发生。我们对澳大利亚、新西兰(ANZ)和英国(UK)的重症监护医生进行了一项国际调查。调查的目的是评估目前的处方实践模式,对危重患者他汀类药物治疗的态度,以及对危重患者他汀类药物治疗介入试验的需要的意见。方法:通过迭代过程开发调查问题。一个专家小组对结果的26个项目进行了外观和内容有效性和清晰度的审查。在澳大利亚、加拿大和英国的ICU医生进行试点测试后,这些问题得到了进一步完善。我们使用在线Smart SurveyTM软件来管理调查。结果:239人(澳新银行62人,英国177人)中58%在教学医院工作;大多数(78.2%)在“封闭”的医疗和外科病例混合的单位执业(71.0%)。最常用的他汀类药物是辛伐他汀(英国77.6%)和阿托伐他汀(澳新地区66.1%)。他汀类药物选择的主要原因是入院前处方和药房可获得性。大多数受访者报告从未开始使用他汀类药物来预防(65.3%)或治疗(89.1%)器官功能障碍。只有少数人(10%)不同意他汀类药物在危重患者中出现严重副作用的风险较低的说法。大多数(84.5%)受访者强烈同意需要进行他汀类药物预防的临床试验。超过一半(56.5%)的人倾向于将器官衰竭率作为此类试验的主要结局,而少数(40.6%)倾向于死亡率。结论:尽管他汀类药物的处方类型存在差异,但英国和澳新银行的重症监护医生报告了类似的处方做法。来自两个社区的应答者都认为需要进行一项试验来测试他汀类药物是否可以预防败血症患者发生新的器官衰竭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statin therapy in critical illness: an international survey of intensive care physicians' opinions, attitudes and practice. Correction: Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy (ARVs): incidence, type and risk factors in Nigeria Data for drugs available through low-cost prescription drug programs are available through pharmacy benefit manager and claims data. Population prevalence of high dose paracetamol in dispensed paracetamol/opioid prescription combinations: an observational study. Adherence to medication for the treatment of psychosis: rates and risk factors in an Ethiopian population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1