Improved arthritic knee health in a pilot RCT of phytotherapy.

Louise Hamblin, Alex Laird, Edward Parkes, Ann F Walker
{"title":"Improved arthritic knee health in a pilot RCT of phytotherapy.","authors":"Louise Hamblin,&nbsp;Alex Laird,&nbsp;Edward Parkes,&nbsp;Ann F Walker","doi":"10.1177/1466424008092798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although practitioner-prescribed 'western' herbal medicine (phytotherapy) is a popular complementary therapy in the UK, no clinical studies have been reported on patient-orientated outcomes. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of phytotherapy on symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. A previous study of Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, acted as a model in the development of the protocol of this investigation. Twenty adults, previously diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee, were recruited from two Inner London GP practices into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study carried out in a primary-care setting. All subjects were seen in consultation three times by a herbal practitioner who was blinded to the randomization coding. Each subject was prescribed treatment and given lifestyle advice according to usual practice: continuation of conventional medication where applicable, healthy-eating advice and nutrient supplementation. Individualized herbal medicine was prescribed for each patient, but only dispensed for those randomized to active treatment-- the remainder were supplied with a placebo. At baseline and outcome (after ten weeks of treatment), subjects completed a food frequency questionnaire and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee health and Measure Yourself Outcome Profile (MYMOP) wellbeing questionnaires. Subjects completing the study per protocol (n = 14) reported an increased intake of wholegrain foods (p = 0.045) and oily fish (p = 0.039) compared to baseline, but no increase in fruit and vegetables and dairy products intakes. There was no difference in the primary outcome measure of knee health assessed as the difference in the mean response (baseline-week 10) in WOMAC score between the two treatment groups. However, there was, compared with baseline, improvement in the active group (n = 9) for the mean WOMAC stiffness sub-score at week 5 (p = 0.035) and week 10 (p = 0.060) but not in the placebo group (n = 5). Furthermore, for the active, but not the placebo group, the mean WOMAC total and sub-scores all showed clinically significant improvement (> or = 20%) in knee symptoms at weeks 5 and 10 compared with baseline. Moreover, the mean MYMOP symptom 2 sub-score, mostly relating to osteoarthritis (OA), showed significant improvement at week 5 (p = 0.02) and week 10 (p = 0.008) compared with baseline for the active, but not for the placebo group. This pilot study showed that herbal medicine prescribed for the individual by a herbal practitioner resulted in improvement of symptoms of OA of the knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":22790,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","volume":"128 5","pages":"255-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1466424008092798","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424008092798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Although practitioner-prescribed 'western' herbal medicine (phytotherapy) is a popular complementary therapy in the UK, no clinical studies have been reported on patient-orientated outcomes. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of phytotherapy on symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. A previous study of Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, acted as a model in the development of the protocol of this investigation. Twenty adults, previously diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee, were recruited from two Inner London GP practices into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study carried out in a primary-care setting. All subjects were seen in consultation three times by a herbal practitioner who was blinded to the randomization coding. Each subject was prescribed treatment and given lifestyle advice according to usual practice: continuation of conventional medication where applicable, healthy-eating advice and nutrient supplementation. Individualized herbal medicine was prescribed for each patient, but only dispensed for those randomized to active treatment-- the remainder were supplied with a placebo. At baseline and outcome (after ten weeks of treatment), subjects completed a food frequency questionnaire and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee health and Measure Yourself Outcome Profile (MYMOP) wellbeing questionnaires. Subjects completing the study per protocol (n = 14) reported an increased intake of wholegrain foods (p = 0.045) and oily fish (p = 0.039) compared to baseline, but no increase in fruit and vegetables and dairy products intakes. There was no difference in the primary outcome measure of knee health assessed as the difference in the mean response (baseline-week 10) in WOMAC score between the two treatment groups. However, there was, compared with baseline, improvement in the active group (n = 9) for the mean WOMAC stiffness sub-score at week 5 (p = 0.035) and week 10 (p = 0.060) but not in the placebo group (n = 5). Furthermore, for the active, but not the placebo group, the mean WOMAC total and sub-scores all showed clinically significant improvement (> or = 20%) in knee symptoms at weeks 5 and 10 compared with baseline. Moreover, the mean MYMOP symptom 2 sub-score, mostly relating to osteoarthritis (OA), showed significant improvement at week 5 (p = 0.02) and week 10 (p = 0.008) compared with baseline for the active, but not for the placebo group. This pilot study showed that herbal medicine prescribed for the individual by a herbal practitioner resulted in improvement of symptoms of OA of the knee.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善膝关节关节炎健康在植物疗法的试点RCT。
尽管医生开的“西方”草药(植物疗法)在英国是一种流行的补充疗法,但没有关于以患者为导向的结果的临床研究报告。这项初步研究的目的是调查植物疗法对膝关节骨关节炎症状的影响。此前发表在《美国医学会杂志》(Journal of the American Medical Association)上的一项关于中草药治疗肠易激综合征的研究,为本研究方案的制定提供了模型。20名先前被诊断患有膝关节骨关节炎的成年人,从内伦敦的两家全科医生诊所招募到这个随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的试点研究中,该研究在初级保健环境中进行。所有受试者由一位对随机化编码不知情的草药医生进行三次咨询。每个受试者都按照惯例进行治疗并给予生活方式建议:继续使用常规药物(如适用)、健康饮食建议和营养补充。为每位患者开了个体化的草药,但只给那些随机接受积极治疗的患者配药,其余患者则服用安慰剂。在基线和结果(治疗10周后),受试者完成了食物频率问卷和西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)膝关节健康和测量自己结果概况(MYMOP)健康问卷。每个方案完成研究的受试者(n = 14)报告说,与基线相比,全谷物食品(p = 0.045)和油性鱼类(p = 0.039)的摄入量增加,但水果、蔬菜和乳制品的摄入量没有增加。以WOMAC评分的平均反应(基线-第10周)的差异来评估膝关节健康的主要结局指标在两个治疗组之间没有差异。然而,与基线相比,活动组(n = 9)在第5周(p = 0.035)和第10周(p = 0.060)的平均WOMAC刚度亚评分有改善,而安慰剂组(n = 5)没有改善。此外,对于活动组,而不是安慰剂组,在第5周和第10周,膝关节症状的平均WOMAC总分和亚评分均显示临床显着改善(>或= 20%)与基线相比。此外,MYMOP症状2的平均分,主要与骨关节炎(OA)有关,与基线相比,在第5周(p = 0.02)和第10周(p = 0.008),活跃组有显著改善,但安慰剂组没有。这项初步研究表明,由草药医生为个人开的草药可改善膝关节OA的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trust me I'm a doctor (or an art therapist or a biomedical scientist or a chiropodist .....). Policy and politics. Will new regulations reverse the 'drop' in homeopathy? The number of people buying medicine online. Regulating the health and social care sector--are we getting there?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1