To the bitter end: disparities in end-of-life care.

Alberto Coustasse, Theresa Quiroz, Sue G Lurie
{"title":"To the bitter end: disparities in end-of-life care.","authors":"Alberto Coustasse,&nbsp;Theresa Quiroz,&nbsp;Sue G Lurie","doi":"10.1080/15390940802232473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although technological advancements have provided the means to sustain life and provide care regardless of whether the treatment is appropriate and compassionate given the condition of the patient, bioethical, legal, and moral concerns related to disparities in care still arise in the United States. These concerns call into question the necessity to continue life-sustaining or palliative care treatments when patients and/or families are faced with end-of-life decisions. This study will focus on various historical, clinical cultural, and ethical issues that have placed this dilemma into a controversial public spectrum, by using case studies retrieved from referenced literature, which illustrate disparities in care at the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":84996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital marketing & public relations","volume":"18 2","pages":"167-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15390940802232473","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital marketing & public relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15390940802232473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Although technological advancements have provided the means to sustain life and provide care regardless of whether the treatment is appropriate and compassionate given the condition of the patient, bioethical, legal, and moral concerns related to disparities in care still arise in the United States. These concerns call into question the necessity to continue life-sustaining or palliative care treatments when patients and/or families are faced with end-of-life decisions. This study will focus on various historical, clinical cultural, and ethical issues that have placed this dilemma into a controversial public spectrum, by using case studies retrieved from referenced literature, which illustrate disparities in care at the end of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最后:临终关怀方面的差异。
尽管技术进步已经提供了维持生命和提供护理的手段,而不管治疗是否适当和是否富有同情心,但在美国,与护理差异有关的生物伦理、法律和道德问题仍然出现。当患者和/或家属面临生命终结的决定时,这些担忧引发了对继续维持生命或姑息治疗的必要性的质疑。本研究将通过从参考文献中检索的案例研究,重点关注各种历史、临床文化和伦理问题,这些问题使这一困境成为一个有争议的公共领域,这些案例研究说明了生命末期护理的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
6 Public relations and legitimacy 9 Public relations and social media 20 Global public relations: Multi-paradigmatic perspectives, key approaches and future directions 31 Critical reflections on the field Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1