Advertised sustainability practices among suppliers to a university hospital operating room.

Thomas M Schieble
{"title":"Advertised sustainability practices among suppliers to a university hospital operating room.","authors":"Thomas M Schieble","doi":"10.1080/15390940802232424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to identify firms supplying products to our university operating room (OR) that promote sustainable manufacturing methods. Results show that 72% of our suppliers, or 152 of 211 companies, do not promote sustainability practices in a salient manner. Multi-national firms document sustainability methods significantly more than U.S. divisions of multi-nationals or U.S. firms with chi-square = 157.93 (p < 0.001). Although the current study did not evaluate real manufacturing methods, sustainability promotion is an important marketing tool through which purchasers may begin the process of due diligence for product selection. Lack of sustainability information among suppliers in this study suggests that hospital procurement departments likely focus solely on issues like price or quality when making purchase decisions. These results also suggest an opportunity for healthcare administrators to evaluate more fully the products involved in the healthcare supply chain; the intrinsic, intangible value added to hospital products through sustainable manufacturing is consistent with responsible patient care and has the potential to create marketing and public relations value.</p>","PeriodicalId":84996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital marketing & public relations","volume":"18 2","pages":"135-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15390940802232424","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital marketing & public relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15390940802232424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify firms supplying products to our university operating room (OR) that promote sustainable manufacturing methods. Results show that 72% of our suppliers, or 152 of 211 companies, do not promote sustainability practices in a salient manner. Multi-national firms document sustainability methods significantly more than U.S. divisions of multi-nationals or U.S. firms with chi-square = 157.93 (p < 0.001). Although the current study did not evaluate real manufacturing methods, sustainability promotion is an important marketing tool through which purchasers may begin the process of due diligence for product selection. Lack of sustainability information among suppliers in this study suggests that hospital procurement departments likely focus solely on issues like price or quality when making purchase decisions. These results also suggest an opportunity for healthcare administrators to evaluate more fully the products involved in the healthcare supply chain; the intrinsic, intangible value added to hospital products through sustainable manufacturing is consistent with responsible patient care and has the potential to create marketing and public relations value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一家大学医院手术室的供应商中宣传可持续发展实践。
本研究旨在找出为我们的大学手术室(OR)提供产品的公司,促进可持续的制造方法。结果显示,我们的供应商中有72%,或211家公司中的152家,没有以显著的方式促进可持续发展实践。跨国公司编制的可持续发展方法显著多于跨国公司的美国分部或美国公司,卡方= 157.93 (p < 0.001)。虽然目前的研究没有评估真正的制造方法,可持续性推广是一个重要的营销工具,通过它,购买者可以开始尽职调查的过程中,为产品的选择。在这项研究中,供应商缺乏可持续性信息,这表明医院采购部门在做出采购决策时可能只关注价格或质量等问题。这些结果还为医疗保健管理人员提供了一个机会,可以更全面地评估医疗保健供应链中涉及的产品;通过可持续制造为医院产品增加的内在无形价值与负责任的患者护理相一致,并具有创造营销和公共关系价值的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
6 Public relations and legitimacy 9 Public relations and social media 20 Global public relations: Multi-paradigmatic perspectives, key approaches and future directions 31 Critical reflections on the field Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1