Recovery: what does this mean to patients with low back pain?

Julia M Hush, Kathryn Refshauge, Gerard Sullivan, Lorraine De Souza, Christopher G Maher, James H McAuley
{"title":"Recovery: what does this mean to patients with low back pain?","authors":"Julia M Hush, Kathryn Refshauge, Gerard Sullivan, Lorraine De Souza, Christopher G Maher, James H McAuley","doi":"10.1002/art.24162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo explore patients' perceptions of recovery from low back pain, about which little is known.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA qualitative study was conducted in which 36 participants, either recovered or unrecovered from low back pain, participated in focus groups. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis was used to identify emergent themes and domains of recovery.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPatients' views of recovery encompassed a range of factors that can be broadly classified into the domains of symptom attenuation, improved capacity to perform a broad scope of self-defined functional activities, and achievement of an acceptable quality of life. An interactive model is proposed to describe the relationships between these domains, cognitive appraisal of the pain experience, and self-rated recovery. Pain attenuation alone was not a reliable indicator of recovery.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe construct of recovery for typical back pain patients seeking primary care is more complex than previously recognized and is a highly individual construct, determined by appraisal of the impact of symptoms on daily functional activities as well as quality of life factors. These findings will be valuable for reassessing how to optimize measures of recovery from low back pain by addressing the spectrum of factors patients consider meaningful.","PeriodicalId":8405,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"61 1","pages":"124-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24162","citationCount":"122","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 122

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore patients' perceptions of recovery from low back pain, about which little is known. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted in which 36 participants, either recovered or unrecovered from low back pain, participated in focus groups. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis was used to identify emergent themes and domains of recovery. RESULTS Patients' views of recovery encompassed a range of factors that can be broadly classified into the domains of symptom attenuation, improved capacity to perform a broad scope of self-defined functional activities, and achievement of an acceptable quality of life. An interactive model is proposed to describe the relationships between these domains, cognitive appraisal of the pain experience, and self-rated recovery. Pain attenuation alone was not a reliable indicator of recovery. CONCLUSION The construct of recovery for typical back pain patients seeking primary care is more complex than previously recognized and is a highly individual construct, determined by appraisal of the impact of symptoms on daily functional activities as well as quality of life factors. These findings will be valuable for reassessing how to optimize measures of recovery from low back pain by addressing the spectrum of factors patients consider meaningful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复:这对腰痛患者意味着什么?
目的:探讨患者对腰痛康复的认知,这方面的认识尚不清楚。方法:采用定性研究方法,将36名腰痛康复或未康复的参与者分为焦点小组。采访录音并逐字抄写。框架分析用于确定紧急主题和恢复领域。结果:患者对康复的看法包括一系列因素,这些因素可以大致分为症状减轻,自我定义的功能活动能力的提高,以及可接受的生活质量的实现。提出了一个互动模型来描述这些领域之间的关系,疼痛经验的认知评价和自评恢复。疼痛减轻本身并不是恢复的可靠指标。结论:寻求初级保健的典型背痛患者的康复结构比以前认识到的更为复杂,并且是一个高度个性化的结构,由症状对日常功能活动的影响以及生活质量因素的评估来决定。这些发现对于重新评估如何通过解决患者认为有意义的一系列因素来优化从腰痛中恢复的措施是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthritis and rheumatism
Arthritis and rheumatism 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Double-blind, Randomized, 8-week Placebo-controlled followed by a 16-week open label extension study, with the LPA1 receptor antagonist SAR100842 for Patients With Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Secukinumab Achievement of Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Related Remission: 2-Year Results from a Phase 3 Study Assessment of methods to quantitatively evaluate global synovitis activity with FDG-PET/CT Antibodies Against Domain 1 and Domain 4/5 of β2 Glycoprotein I : Clinical Relevance in Obstetric Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome A Self-Determination Theory Based Intervention to Increase Levels of Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Self-Determined Motivation, Physical Activity and Improve Health Outcomes Among Patients Living with Rheumatoid Arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1