Systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple-session early interventions following traumatic events.

IF 14.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY American Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2009-03-01 Epub Date: 2009-02-02 DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040590
Neil P Roberts, Neil J Kitchiner, Justin Kenardy, Jonathan I Bisson
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple-session early interventions following traumatic events.","authors":"Neil P Roberts, Neil J Kitchiner, Justin Kenardy, Jonathan I Bisson","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors sought to determine the efficacy of multiple-session psychological interventions to prevent and treat traumatic stress symptoms beginning within 3 months of a traumatic event.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nine computerized databases were searched, and manual searches were conducted of reference lists of selected articles as well as two journals. In addition, key researchers in the field were contacted to determine whether they were aware of other relevant studies. The reviewers identified randomized controlled trials of multiple-session psychological treatments aimed at preventing or reducing traumatic stress symptoms in individuals within 3 months of exposure to a traumatic event. Details of the studies were independently extracted by two reviewers, and outcome data were entered into the Review Manager software package. Quality assessment was also conducted by two researchers independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies examining a range of interventions were identified. For treatment of individuals exposed to a trauma irrespective of their symptoms, there was no significant difference between any intervention and usual care. For treatment of traumatic stress symptoms irrespective of diagnosis, trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) was more effective than waiting list or supportive counseling conditions. The difference was greatest for treatment of acute stress disorder and acute posttraumatic stress disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trauma-focused CBT within 3 months of a traumatic event appears to be effective for individuals with traumatic stress symptoms, especially those who meet the threshold for a clinical diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7656,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"166 3","pages":"293-301"},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The authors sought to determine the efficacy of multiple-session psychological interventions to prevent and treat traumatic stress symptoms beginning within 3 months of a traumatic event.

Method: Nine computerized databases were searched, and manual searches were conducted of reference lists of selected articles as well as two journals. In addition, key researchers in the field were contacted to determine whether they were aware of other relevant studies. The reviewers identified randomized controlled trials of multiple-session psychological treatments aimed at preventing or reducing traumatic stress symptoms in individuals within 3 months of exposure to a traumatic event. Details of the studies were independently extracted by two reviewers, and outcome data were entered into the Review Manager software package. Quality assessment was also conducted by two researchers independently.

Results: Twenty-five studies examining a range of interventions were identified. For treatment of individuals exposed to a trauma irrespective of their symptoms, there was no significant difference between any intervention and usual care. For treatment of traumatic stress symptoms irrespective of diagnosis, trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) was more effective than waiting list or supportive counseling conditions. The difference was greatest for treatment of acute stress disorder and acute posttraumatic stress disorder.

Conclusions: Trauma-focused CBT within 3 months of a traumatic event appears to be effective for individuals with traumatic stress symptoms, especially those who meet the threshold for a clinical diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性事件后多期早期干预的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:作者试图确定多次心理干预预防和治疗创伤性事件后3个月内开始的创伤应激症状的疗效。方法:检索9个计算机数据库,人工检索选定文章的参考文献表和2种期刊。此外,还联系了该领域的主要研究人员,以确定他们是否了解其他相关研究。审稿人确定了多阶段心理治疗的随机对照试验,旨在预防或减少个体在3个月内暴露于创伤性事件的创伤应激症状。研究细节由两位审稿人独立提取,结果数据输入Review Manager软件包。质量评估也由两名研究人员独立进行。结果:确定了25项研究,检查了一系列干预措施。对于暴露于创伤的个体的治疗,无论其症状如何,任何干预与常规护理之间没有显着差异。对于创伤应激症状的治疗,无论诊断如何,以创伤为中心的认知行为疗法(CBT)比等候名单或支持性咨询条件更有效。治疗急性应激障碍和急性创伤后应激障碍的差异最大。结论:创伤性事件后3个月内以创伤为重点的CBT对有创伤应激症状的个体有效,尤其是那些达到临床诊断门槛的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychiatry, dedicated to keeping psychiatry vibrant and relevant, publishes the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The journal covers the full spectrum of issues related to mental health diagnoses and treatment, presenting original articles on new developments in diagnosis, treatment, neuroscience, and patient populations.
期刊最新文献
Interpreting the Signal Beyond the Trend: Response to Hanyu. Rising Suicidality Among U.S. Adolescents: Interpreting the Signal Beyond the Trend. Comparative Effectiveness Trials and the Quest for Personalized Treatments: The Case of Antipsychotics. Neuroplasticity, Antipsychotic Efficacy, Schizophrenia Risk Reduction With Doxycycline Exposure, and Cannabis and Alcohol Use Interactions. Rethinking Antipsychotic Comparisons: The Role of Prior Exposure and Tolerability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1