Methanol poisoning and long term sequelae - a six years follow-up after a large methanol outbreak.

Raido Paasma, Knut Erik Hovda, Dag Jacobsen
{"title":"Methanol poisoning and long term sequelae - a six years follow-up after a large methanol outbreak.","authors":"Raido Paasma,&nbsp;Knut Erik Hovda,&nbsp;Dag Jacobsen","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-9-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mass poisonings with methanol are rare but occur regularly both in developed and in developing countries. Data from the poisoning episodes are often published, but follow-up-data is scarce. We therefore conducted a six year follow-up study after the large methanol outbreak in Estonia in September 2001.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surviving victims from the outbreak were contacted and invited to an interview and a clinical evaluation by an ophthalmologist and a physician. The patients that failed to respond were searched for in the Estonian Register of Population and through their General Practitioner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the outbreak in 2001, 86/111 hospitalized patients survived: 66 without sequelae (Group I) and 20 with sequelae (Group II). Six years later, 26/86 were dead, 33/86 could not be tracked down, and so only 27/86 of these were followed up and examined: 22/66 of the patients in Group I, and 5/20 in Group II were found and examined. From Group I, 8/22 were identified with new neurological impairment and 8/22 with new visual disturbances after discharge. From Group II, visual disturbances (n = 4) and neurological impairment (n = 3) were still present in all patients. Among the 26 dead, 19 were from Group I, and seven were from Group II. Alcohol intoxication was the most frequent cause of death (7/26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All sequelae were still present six years after the initial poisoning suggesting that these were irreversible damages. On follow-up, apparently new neurological and visual complications were identified in 36% and 36%, respectively. 35% of the patients initially discharged with sequelae and 29% discharged without were dead six years later; 27% of them from alcohol intoxication.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"9 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-9-5","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-9-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Mass poisonings with methanol are rare but occur regularly both in developed and in developing countries. Data from the poisoning episodes are often published, but follow-up-data is scarce. We therefore conducted a six year follow-up study after the large methanol outbreak in Estonia in September 2001.

Methods: Surviving victims from the outbreak were contacted and invited to an interview and a clinical evaluation by an ophthalmologist and a physician. The patients that failed to respond were searched for in the Estonian Register of Population and through their General Practitioner.

Results: During the outbreak in 2001, 86/111 hospitalized patients survived: 66 without sequelae (Group I) and 20 with sequelae (Group II). Six years later, 26/86 were dead, 33/86 could not be tracked down, and so only 27/86 of these were followed up and examined: 22/66 of the patients in Group I, and 5/20 in Group II were found and examined. From Group I, 8/22 were identified with new neurological impairment and 8/22 with new visual disturbances after discharge. From Group II, visual disturbances (n = 4) and neurological impairment (n = 3) were still present in all patients. Among the 26 dead, 19 were from Group I, and seven were from Group II. Alcohol intoxication was the most frequent cause of death (7/26).

Conclusion: All sequelae were still present six years after the initial poisoning suggesting that these were irreversible damages. On follow-up, apparently new neurological and visual complications were identified in 36% and 36%, respectively. 35% of the patients initially discharged with sequelae and 29% discharged without were dead six years later; 27% of them from alcohol intoxication.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲醇中毒和长期后遗症-大规模甲醇爆发后的六年随访。
背景:大规模甲醇中毒是罕见的,但在发达国家和发展中国家都经常发生。中毒事件的数据经常被公布,但随访数据很少。因此,我们在2001年9月爱沙尼亚大规模甲醇爆发后进行了为期六年的随访研究。方法:与疫情幸存者进行接触,邀请他们接受眼科医生和内科医生的访谈和临床评估。在爱沙尼亚人口登记处和通过他们的全科医生搜索没有答复的病人。结果:2001年暴发时,住院患者存活86/111例,无后遗症66例(ⅰ组),有后遗症20例(ⅱ组),6年后死亡26/86例,下落不明33/86例,随访检查27/86例,ⅰ组22/66例,ⅱ组5/20例。在第一组中,8/22例出院后出现新的神经功能障碍,8/22例出院后出现新的视觉障碍。从第二组开始,所有患者仍存在视觉障碍(n = 4)和神经功能障碍(n = 3)。26名死者中,ⅰ组19人,ⅱ组7人。酒精中毒是最常见的死亡原因(7/26)。结论:所有的后遗症在初次中毒6年后仍然存在,表明这些是不可逆的损害。在随访中,分别有36%和36%的人发现明显新的神经和视觉并发症。出院时有后遗症的患者占35%,无后遗症的患者占29%,6年后死亡;27%死于酒精中毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statin therapy in critical illness: an international survey of intensive care physicians' opinions, attitudes and practice. Correction: Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy (ARVs): incidence, type and risk factors in Nigeria Data for drugs available through low-cost prescription drug programs are available through pharmacy benefit manager and claims data. Population prevalence of high dose paracetamol in dispensed paracetamol/opioid prescription combinations: an observational study. Adherence to medication for the treatment of psychosis: rates and risk factors in an Ethiopian population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1