[Effect of anterior cruciate ligament rupture on biomechanics of lateral collateral ligament].

Q3 Medicine 中国修复重建外科杂志 Pub Date : 2009-03-01
Kanghua Li, Peng Li, Ling Luo, Yucheng Li, Yongqiang Xu, Yuanting Zhao
{"title":"[Effect of anterior cruciate ligament rupture on biomechanics of lateral collateral ligament].","authors":"Kanghua Li,&nbsp;Peng Li,&nbsp;Ling Luo,&nbsp;Yucheng Li,&nbsp;Yongqiang Xu,&nbsp;Yuanting Zhao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture on the biomechanics of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The specimens in this experiment were knee joints from 6 normal fresh adult male cadavers which was donated voluntarily, aged of 26-35 years with an average of 31.4 years. The knee joints were dissymmetry with 3 in left and right sides respectively. At first, all the 6 specimens lying on the self-made movement tooting, whose LCL straining were measured by strain gauges at different angles (0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees) under axial loads of 400 N by e-testing machine for simulation of the normal knee joint force, were regarded as the intact ACL group. Then, the ACL in all 6 specimens were cut off completely as the deficiency group and did the same step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strain of the LCL were as follows at 0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees: (0.00 +/- 1.63), (-17.2 +/- 8.57), (-24.00 +/- 4.80) and (26.50 +/- 4.65) mu epsilon in intact ACL group; (0.75 +/- 8.22), (-52.75 +/- 3.33), (24.30 +/- 4.99) and (26.30 +/- 4.27) mu epsilon in deficiency group. There was no significant difference at 0 degree and 90 degrees flexion (P > 0.05), but significant difference at 30 degrees and 60 degrees flexion (P < 0.05) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rupture of the ACL has significantly effect on the strain of the LCL which suffering abnormal load in the state at 30 degrees and 60 degrees flexion. At 30 degrees flexion the relaxation of the LCL increased, which means the possibility of the injury of the LCL is rare; and at 60 degrees flexion the LCL become very tense and thereby at the high risk of instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"23 3","pages":"287-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture on the biomechanics of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL).

Methods: The specimens in this experiment were knee joints from 6 normal fresh adult male cadavers which was donated voluntarily, aged of 26-35 years with an average of 31.4 years. The knee joints were dissymmetry with 3 in left and right sides respectively. At first, all the 6 specimens lying on the self-made movement tooting, whose LCL straining were measured by strain gauges at different angles (0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees) under axial loads of 400 N by e-testing machine for simulation of the normal knee joint force, were regarded as the intact ACL group. Then, the ACL in all 6 specimens were cut off completely as the deficiency group and did the same step.

Results: The strain of the LCL were as follows at 0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees: (0.00 +/- 1.63), (-17.2 +/- 8.57), (-24.00 +/- 4.80) and (26.50 +/- 4.65) mu epsilon in intact ACL group; (0.75 +/- 8.22), (-52.75 +/- 3.33), (24.30 +/- 4.99) and (26.30 +/- 4.27) mu epsilon in deficiency group. There was no significant difference at 0 degree and 90 degrees flexion (P > 0.05), but significant difference at 30 degrees and 60 degrees flexion (P < 0.05) between the two groups.

Conclusion: The rupture of the ACL has significantly effect on the strain of the LCL which suffering abnormal load in the state at 30 degrees and 60 degrees flexion. At 30 degrees flexion the relaxation of the LCL increased, which means the possibility of the injury of the LCL is rare; and at 60 degrees flexion the LCL become very tense and thereby at the high risk of instability.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带断裂对侧副韧带生物力学的影响。
目的:探讨前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂对侧副韧带(LCL)生物力学的影响。方法:本实验选用自愿捐献的6具正常新鲜成年男性尸体膝关节标本,年龄26 ~ 35岁,平均年龄31.4岁。膝关节不对称,左右两侧各3个。首先,将6个躺在自制运动支架上的试件,在400 N的轴向载荷下,通过电子试验机模拟正常膝关节受力,用应变片以不同角度(0、30、60、90度)测量其LCL应变,均视为完整前交叉韧带组。然后,将6个标本的前交叉韧带全部切断作为缺陷组,进行相同的步骤。结果:完整ACL组在0、30、60、90度时LCL的菌落分别为(0.00 +/- 1.63)、(-17.2 +/- 8.57)、(-24.00 +/- 4.80)、(26.50 +/- 4.65)mu epsilon;(0.75 + / - 8.22),(-52.75 + / - 3.33),(24.30 + / - 4.99)和(26.30 + / - 4.27)με缺乏组。屈曲0度、90度组差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),屈曲30度、60度组差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:前交叉韧带断裂对前交叉韧带在30度和60度屈曲状态下承受异常负荷时的应变有显著影响。在30度屈曲时,LCL的松弛度增加,这意味着LCL损伤的可能性很小;当屈曲60度时,LCL变得非常紧张,因此有很高的不稳定风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Interventional revascularization combined with perforator composite flap for staged treatment of peripheral arterial disease with ankle soft tissue defects]. [Endoscopic-assisted median nerve decompression combined with one-stage tendon transfer for reconstruction of thumb abduction in treatment of severe carpal tunnel syndrome]. [Effectiveness analysis of tibial nerve transection with epineurial suture and division of common plantar digital nerve branches in treatment of congenital macrodactyly in children]. [Application and advances of exosome-hydrogel system in wound healing]. [Application progress of customized steel plates in osteotomy and orthopedic treatment of knee osteoarthritis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1