The frequency of adverse drug reaction related admissions according to method of detection, admission urgency and medical department specialty.

Miran Brvar, Nina Fokter, Matjaz Bunc, Martin Mozina
{"title":"The frequency of adverse drug reaction related admissions according to method of detection, admission urgency and medical department specialty.","authors":"Miran Brvar,&nbsp;Nina Fokter,&nbsp;Matjaz Bunc,&nbsp;Martin Mozina","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-9-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) have been regarded as a major public health problem since they represent a sizable percentage of admissions. Unfortunately, there is a wide variation of ADR related admissions among different studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of ADR related admissions and its dependency on reporting and method of detection, urgency of admissions and included medical departments reflecting department/hospital type within one study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study team of internal medicine specialists retrospectively reviewed 520 randomly selected medical records (3%) of patients treated in the medical departments of the primary city and tertiary referral governmental hospital for certain ADRs causing admissions regarding WHO causality criteria. All medical records were checked for whether the treating physicians recognised and documented ADRs causing admissions. The hospital information system was checked to ensure ADR related diagnoses were properly coded and the database of a national spontaneous reporting system was searched for patients with ADRs included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The established frequency of admissions due to certain ADRs recognised by the study team and documented in medical records by the treating physicians was the same and represented 5.8% of all patients (30/520). The frequency of ADR causing admissions detected by employing a computer-assisted approach using an ICD-10 coding system was 0.2% (1/520), and no patient admitted due to ADRs was reported to the national reporting system (0/520). The recognized frequency of ADR related admissions also depends on the department's specialty (p = 0.001) and acceptance of urgently admitted patients (p = 0.001). Patients admitted due to ADRs were significantly older compared to patients without ADRs (p = 0.025). Gastrointestinal bleeding due to NSAID, acetylsalicylic acid and warfarin was the most common ADR that resulted in admission and represented 40% of all certain ADRs (12/30) according to WHO causality criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADRs cause 5.8% of admissions in medical departments in the primary city and tertiary referral hospital. The physicians recognise certain ADR related admissions according to WHO causality criteria and note them in medical records, but they rarely code and report ADRs. The established frequency of ADR related admissions depends on the detection method, department specialty and frequency of urgently admitted patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"9 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-9-8","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-9-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

Background: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) have been regarded as a major public health problem since they represent a sizable percentage of admissions. Unfortunately, there is a wide variation of ADR related admissions among different studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of ADR related admissions and its dependency on reporting and method of detection, urgency of admissions and included medical departments reflecting department/hospital type within one study.

Methods: The study team of internal medicine specialists retrospectively reviewed 520 randomly selected medical records (3%) of patients treated in the medical departments of the primary city and tertiary referral governmental hospital for certain ADRs causing admissions regarding WHO causality criteria. All medical records were checked for whether the treating physicians recognised and documented ADRs causing admissions. The hospital information system was checked to ensure ADR related diagnoses were properly coded and the database of a national spontaneous reporting system was searched for patients with ADRs included in this study.

Results: The established frequency of admissions due to certain ADRs recognised by the study team and documented in medical records by the treating physicians was the same and represented 5.8% of all patients (30/520). The frequency of ADR causing admissions detected by employing a computer-assisted approach using an ICD-10 coding system was 0.2% (1/520), and no patient admitted due to ADRs was reported to the national reporting system (0/520). The recognized frequency of ADR related admissions also depends on the department's specialty (p = 0.001) and acceptance of urgently admitted patients (p = 0.001). Patients admitted due to ADRs were significantly older compared to patients without ADRs (p = 0.025). Gastrointestinal bleeding due to NSAID, acetylsalicylic acid and warfarin was the most common ADR that resulted in admission and represented 40% of all certain ADRs (12/30) according to WHO causality criteria.

Conclusion: ADRs cause 5.8% of admissions in medical departments in the primary city and tertiary referral hospital. The physicians recognise certain ADR related admissions according to WHO causality criteria and note them in medical records, but they rarely code and report ADRs. The established frequency of ADR related admissions depends on the detection method, department specialty and frequency of urgently admitted patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据检测方法、就诊急迫性和科室专科,与药物不良反应相关的住院频次。
背景:药物不良反应(adr)已被视为一个主要的公共卫生问题,因为它们代表了相当大的比例入院。不幸的是,在不同的研究中,与ADR相关的入院情况差异很大。本研究的目的是评估与ADR相关的入院频率及其对报告和检测方法的依赖性、入院的紧迫性,并在一项研究中纳入反映科室/医院类型的医疗部门。方法:由内科专家组成的研究小组回顾性分析了520例随机选择的病历(3%),这些病历均为在一级城市医院和三级政府转诊医院的内科治疗的患者,这些患者因WHO因果标准的某些adr导致入院。检查了所有的医疗记录,看主治医生是否认识到并记录了导致住院的不良反应。检查医院信息系统以确保ADR相关诊断正确编码,并检索国家自发报告系统数据库中纳入本研究的ADR患者。结果:由研究小组确认并由治疗医生记录在医疗记录中的某些不良反应导致的既定入院频率相同,占所有患者的5.8%(30/520)。采用计算机辅助方法使用ICD-10编码系统检测到的ADR导致入院的频率为0.2%(1/520),没有因ADR入院的患者报告到国家报告系统(0/520)。与ADR相关的入院频率也取决于科室专科(p = 0.001)和紧急入院患者的接受程度(p = 0.001)。与无adr的患者相比,因adr入院的患者明显衰老(p = 0.025)。根据WHO的因果标准,非甾体抗炎药、乙酰水杨酸和华法林引起的胃肠道出血是导致住院的最常见的ADR,占所有ADR的40%(12/30)。结论:一级城市和三级转诊医院内科住院患者中,药品不良反应发生率为5.8%。医生根据世卫组织的因果关系标准确认某些与ADR相关的入院,并在医疗记录中予以记录,但他们很少对ADR进行编码和报告。与ADR相关的入院频率的确定取决于检测方法、科室专科和急诊患者的就诊频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statin therapy in critical illness: an international survey of intensive care physicians' opinions, attitudes and practice. Correction: Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy (ARVs): incidence, type and risk factors in Nigeria Data for drugs available through low-cost prescription drug programs are available through pharmacy benefit manager and claims data. Population prevalence of high dose paracetamol in dispensed paracetamol/opioid prescription combinations: an observational study. Adherence to medication for the treatment of psychosis: rates and risk factors in an Ethiopian population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1