Survey of complementary and alternative medicine practitioners regarding cancer management and research.

C D R Colleen Lee, Farah Zia, Oluwadamilola Olaku, Joan Michie, Jeffrey D White
{"title":"Survey of complementary and alternative medicine practitioners regarding cancer management and research.","authors":"C D R Colleen Lee,&nbsp;Farah Zia,&nbsp;Oluwadamilola Olaku,&nbsp;Joan Michie,&nbsp;Jeffrey D White","doi":"10.2310/7200.2009.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary purpose of this survey was to assess the interest and concerns of a group of cancer complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners regarding CAM research issues. These issues include the CAM modalities used most often by CAM practitioners in the treatment of cancer patients, cancer CAM practitioners' perceptions of the most promising areas of cancer CAM research, the perceived obstacles to carrying out research objectives in the emerging field of cancer CAM research, the extent of awareness of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Best Case Series Program, and CAM practitioners' level of interest in research collaboration with CAM researchers. A cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of cancer CAM practitioners was conducted. One hundred thirty-four respondents completed the survey. About 72% of the respondents were involved in the care of cancer patients, and these were considered the informative respondents. All results were from the informative respondent group. Respondent practitioners provided care using interventions from all seven of the predefined CAM categories. This care was provided to improve both quality of life and survival. Over two-thirds of the respondents rated research in pharmacologic and biologic treatments, alternative medical systems and nutritional therapeutics for cancer treatment, and symptom/side-effect management as high-priority areas. Although no single obstacle to research predominated as the most significant, the most frequently encountered obstacle was lack of awareness of appropriate funding sources (75.4%). More than 83% of respondents expressed some interest in or willingness to establish research collaboration with a cancer researcher. The results from this survey indicate that many cancer CAM practitioners have shared interests, perceived obstacles, and desired research opportunities. Despite a small sample size and lack of a feasible process for random sampling, this survey highlights avenues to promote and support collaborative research. The NCI/Office of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine will continue to respond to the concerns elucidated by the survey by developing strategies for future program opportunities within the NCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":87409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology","volume":"7 1","pages":"26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2310/7200.2009.0003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/7200.2009.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The primary purpose of this survey was to assess the interest and concerns of a group of cancer complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners regarding CAM research issues. These issues include the CAM modalities used most often by CAM practitioners in the treatment of cancer patients, cancer CAM practitioners' perceptions of the most promising areas of cancer CAM research, the perceived obstacles to carrying out research objectives in the emerging field of cancer CAM research, the extent of awareness of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Best Case Series Program, and CAM practitioners' level of interest in research collaboration with CAM researchers. A cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of cancer CAM practitioners was conducted. One hundred thirty-four respondents completed the survey. About 72% of the respondents were involved in the care of cancer patients, and these were considered the informative respondents. All results were from the informative respondent group. Respondent practitioners provided care using interventions from all seven of the predefined CAM categories. This care was provided to improve both quality of life and survival. Over two-thirds of the respondents rated research in pharmacologic and biologic treatments, alternative medical systems and nutritional therapeutics for cancer treatment, and symptom/side-effect management as high-priority areas. Although no single obstacle to research predominated as the most significant, the most frequently encountered obstacle was lack of awareness of appropriate funding sources (75.4%). More than 83% of respondents expressed some interest in or willingness to establish research collaboration with a cancer researcher. The results from this survey indicate that many cancer CAM practitioners have shared interests, perceived obstacles, and desired research opportunities. Despite a small sample size and lack of a feasible process for random sampling, this survey highlights avenues to promote and support collaborative research. The NCI/Office of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine will continue to respond to the concerns elucidated by the survey by developing strategies for future program opportunities within the NCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于癌症管理和研究的补充和替代医学从业人员的调查。
本调查的主要目的是评估一组癌症补充和替代医学(CAM)从业人员对CAM研究问题的兴趣和关注。这些问题包括CAM从业者在治疗癌症患者时最常使用的CAM模式,癌症CAM从业者对癌症CAM研究最有前途的领域的看法,在癌症CAM研究的新兴领域中实现研究目标的感知障碍,国家癌症研究所(NCI)最佳案例系列计划的认识程度,以及CAM从业者对与CAM研究人员进行研究合作的兴趣程度。对癌症辅助医学从业人员的方便样本进行了横断面调查。134名受访者完成了调查。约72%的受访者参与了癌症患者的护理,这些受访者被认为是提供信息的受访者。所有结果均来自信息型应答者组。被调查者从业人员使用所有七个预定义CAM类别的干预措施提供护理。提供这种护理是为了提高生活质量和生存率。超过三分之二的答复者认为,用于癌症治疗的药物和生物治疗、替代医疗系统和营养疗法以及症状/副作用管理的研究是高度优先的领域。虽然没有哪个单一的研究障碍是最重要的,但最常见的障碍是缺乏对适当资金来源的认识(75.4%)。超过83%的受访者表示有兴趣或愿意与癌症研究人员建立研究合作。这项调查的结果表明,许多癌症CAM从业者有共同的兴趣,感知到的障碍,和期望的研究机会。尽管样本量小且缺乏可行的随机抽样过程,但该调查强调了促进和支持合作研究的途径。NCI/癌症补充和替代医学办公室将继续通过在NCI内制定未来项目机会的战略来回应调查所阐明的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GINKGO, GINKGO BILOBA Yoga for Pain and Anxiety in Pediatric Hematology- Oncology Patients: Case Series and Review of the Literature Evaluation of the hepatic metabolism and antitumor activity of noni juice (Morinda citrifolia L.) in combination with chemotherapy Not soy simple. Team science of nursing, engineering, statistics, and practitioner in the development of a robotic reflexology device.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1