Application of hypertension guidelines in clinical practice: implementation of the 2007 ESH/ESC European practice Guidelines in Spain.

Alejandro de la Sierra, Jose Luis Zamorano, Luis M Ruilope
{"title":"Application of hypertension guidelines in clinical practice: implementation of the 2007 ESH/ESC European practice Guidelines in Spain.","authors":"Alejandro de la Sierra,&nbsp;Jose Luis Zamorano,&nbsp;Luis M Ruilope","doi":"10.1097/01.hjh.0000356769.32130.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical practice guidelines on the management of hypertension such as the 2007 European Society of Hypertension (ESH)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines were developed with the objective of allowing a greater number of patients with high blood pressure to be detected and effectively treated. The acceptance of hypertension guidelines and their implementation in clinical practice by 'front-line' physicians continues to be less than optimal for a variety of reasons, however, including the gap between academic guideline writers and those whose task it is to implement the guidelines, the physicians' own attitudes and knowledge, the characteristics of the guideline itself, patient-related factors, and external barriers such as a lack of adequate resources. In Spain, a survey of the opinions of Spanish physicians on the 2007 ESH/ESC hypertension Guidelines found that there was agreement that the guidelines allow a better stratification of cardiovascular risk, better control of risk factors related to hypertension, better implementation of an individualized treatment programme, and facilitate choice of the best therapeutic approach for each patient, but there was no consensus that adherence to the guidelines achieves better control of hypertension or that it is more likely to prevent future cardiovascular events. In future, there needs to be a continuous process involving education and audit that takes into account the full spectrum of barriers to acceptance and implementation of hypertension guidelines to ensure that their full potential in reducing the strain on healthcare delivery systems imposed by undiagnosed, untreated and uncontrolled hypertension can be realized.</p>","PeriodicalId":16074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension","volume":"27 3","pages":"S27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.hjh.0000356769.32130.95","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000356769.32130.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines on the management of hypertension such as the 2007 European Society of Hypertension (ESH)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines were developed with the objective of allowing a greater number of patients with high blood pressure to be detected and effectively treated. The acceptance of hypertension guidelines and their implementation in clinical practice by 'front-line' physicians continues to be less than optimal for a variety of reasons, however, including the gap between academic guideline writers and those whose task it is to implement the guidelines, the physicians' own attitudes and knowledge, the characteristics of the guideline itself, patient-related factors, and external barriers such as a lack of adequate resources. In Spain, a survey of the opinions of Spanish physicians on the 2007 ESH/ESC hypertension Guidelines found that there was agreement that the guidelines allow a better stratification of cardiovascular risk, better control of risk factors related to hypertension, better implementation of an individualized treatment programme, and facilitate choice of the best therapeutic approach for each patient, but there was no consensus that adherence to the guidelines achieves better control of hypertension or that it is more likely to prevent future cardiovascular events. In future, there needs to be a continuous process involving education and audit that takes into account the full spectrum of barriers to acceptance and implementation of hypertension guidelines to ensure that their full potential in reducing the strain on healthcare delivery systems imposed by undiagnosed, untreated and uncontrolled hypertension can be realized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高血压指南在临床实践中的应用:2007年ESH/ESC欧洲实践指南在西班牙的实施
制定了高血压管理的临床实践指南,如2007年欧洲高血压学会(ESH)/欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南,其目标是允许更多的高血压患者得到检测和有效治疗。然而,由于各种原因,“一线”医生对高血压指南的接受程度及其在临床实践中的实施仍然不是最理想的,包括学术指南作者与执行指南的人之间的差距、医生自己的态度和知识、指南本身的特点、患者相关因素以及缺乏足够资源等外部障碍。在西班牙,一项针对西班牙医生对2007年ESH/ESC高血压指南意见的调查发现,人们一致认为该指南可以更好地分层心血管风险,更好地控制与高血压相关的危险因素,更好地实施个体化治疗方案,并促进每位患者选择最佳治疗方法。但是,对于遵守指南是否能更好地控制高血压或是否更有可能预防未来的心血管事件,并没有达成共识。未来,需要有一个持续的过程,包括教育和审计,考虑到接受和实施高血压指南的各种障碍,以确保其在减少未确诊、未治疗和未控制的高血压给医疗保健提供系统带来的压力方面的全部潜力得以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endothelial dysfunction in spontaneously hypertensive rats: focus on methodological aspects. Chronic antioxidant therapy fails to ameliorate hypertension: potential mechanisms behind. The protective effect of irbesartan in rats fed a high fat diet is associated with modification of leptin-adiponectin imbalance. Comparison of the effects of indapamide and captopril on the development of spontaneous hypertension. Hypertension and kidney alterations in rat offspring from low protein pregnancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1