Screening for high-risk drinking in a college student health center: characterizing students based on quantity, frequency, and harms.

James F Schaus, Mary Lou Sole, Thomas P McCoy, Natalie Mullett, Jennifer Bolden, Janani Sivasithamparam, Mary Claire O'Brien
{"title":"Screening for high-risk drinking in a college student health center: characterizing students based on quantity, frequency, and harms.","authors":"James F Schaus,&nbsp;Mary Lou Sole,&nbsp;Thomas P McCoy,&nbsp;Natalie Mullett,&nbsp;Jennifer Bolden,&nbsp;Janani Sivasithamparam,&nbsp;Mary Claire O'Brien","doi":"10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined characteristics of students who presented to a college health center and screened positive for the 5/4 definition of high-risk drinking (five or more drinks in a row for men, or four or more drinks in a row for women, on at least one occasion in the past 2 weeks) and analyzed the students' data according to their reporting of alcohol-related harms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Secondary analysis of data obtained for an intervention study to reduce high-risk drinking in college students was used. Data on alcohol use and alcohol-related harms were obtained from Web-based Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaires and 30-day alcohol recall diaries (Timeline Followback calendar). Students (N = 363; 52% female) were classified as nonheavy, heavy, and heavy and frequent drinkers, based on their self-reported alcohol use. Alcohol-related harms were measured using the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index and eight additional items derived from the Drinker Inventory of Consequences-2L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students in the nonheavy, heavy, and heavy and frequent groups had mean Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index scores of 10, 14, and 23, respectively. The heavy-and-frequent drinking group comprised 20% of the sample but experienced 31% of the total harms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 5/4 screening question accurately identified college students presenting to a college health center who were already experiencing significant alcohol-related harms. The addition of a frequency question (drinking 3 or more days per week) to the 5/4 screening question provided a simple method for identifying those students at highest risk and in greatest need of intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":17103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","volume":" 16","pages":"34-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.34","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Objective: This study examined characteristics of students who presented to a college health center and screened positive for the 5/4 definition of high-risk drinking (five or more drinks in a row for men, or four or more drinks in a row for women, on at least one occasion in the past 2 weeks) and analyzed the students' data according to their reporting of alcohol-related harms.

Method: Secondary analysis of data obtained for an intervention study to reduce high-risk drinking in college students was used. Data on alcohol use and alcohol-related harms were obtained from Web-based Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaires and 30-day alcohol recall diaries (Timeline Followback calendar). Students (N = 363; 52% female) were classified as nonheavy, heavy, and heavy and frequent drinkers, based on their self-reported alcohol use. Alcohol-related harms were measured using the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index and eight additional items derived from the Drinker Inventory of Consequences-2L.

Results: Students in the nonheavy, heavy, and heavy and frequent groups had mean Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index scores of 10, 14, and 23, respectively. The heavy-and-frequent drinking group comprised 20% of the sample but experienced 31% of the total harms.

Conclusions: The 5/4 screening question accurately identified college students presenting to a college health center who were already experiencing significant alcohol-related harms. The addition of a frequency question (drinking 3 or more days per week) to the 5/4 screening question provided a simple method for identifying those students at highest risk and in greatest need of intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生健康中心高危饮酒筛查:基于数量、频率和危害的学生特征
目的:本研究检查了到大学健康中心就诊并在高危饮酒(男性连续饮酒5次或以上,女性连续饮酒4次或以上,在过去2周内至少一次)的5/4定义中筛查呈阳性的学生的特征,并根据他们报告的酒精相关危害分析了学生的数据。方法:对减少大学生高危饮酒的干预研究资料进行二次分析。酒精使用和酒精相关危害的数据来自基于网络的健康生活方式问卷和30天酒精回忆日记(时间轴回访日历)。学生(N = 363;根据自我报告的酒精使用情况,将她们分为非重度饮酒者、重度饮酒者、重度饮酒者和频繁饮酒者(52%为女性)。使用罗格斯酒精问题指数和从饮酒者后果清单- 2l中获得的八个附加项目来测量与酒精有关的危害。结果:非重度组、重度组、重度组和频繁组学生的罗格斯酒精问题指数平均得分分别为10、14和23。重度和频繁饮酒组占样本的20%,但遭受的伤害占总危害的31%。结论:5/4筛选问题准确地识别出到大学健康中心就诊的大学生,他们已经经历了严重的酒精相关危害。在5/4筛选问题中增加频率问题(每周饮酒3天或更多)提供了一种简单的方法来识别那些风险最高、最需要干预的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Youth Cognitive Responses to Alcohol Promotional Messaging: A Systematic Review. Alcohol Marketing and Adolescent and Young Adult Alcohol Use Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies. Exposure to Digital Alcohol Marketing and Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review. A Neurobiological Model of Alcohol Marketing Effects on Underage Drinking. Psychological Processes Underlying Effects of Alcohol Marketing on Youth Drinking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1