On the nature, modeling, and neural bases of social ties.

Frans van Winden, Mirre Stallen, K Richard Ridderinkhof
{"title":"On the nature, modeling, and neural bases of social ties.","authors":"Frans van Winden,&nbsp;Mirre Stallen,&nbsp;K Richard Ridderinkhof","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This chapter addresses the nature, formalization, and neural bases of (affective) social ties and discusses the relevance of ties for health economics. A social tie is defined as an affective weight attached by an individual to the well-being of another individual ('utility interdependence'). Ties can be positive or negative, and symmetric or asymmetric between individuals. Characteristic of a social tie, as conceived of here, is that it develops over time under the influence of interaction, in contrast with a trait like altruism. Moreover, a tie is not related to strategic behavior such as reputation formation but seen as generated by affective responses.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>A formalization is presented together with some supportive evidence from behavioral experiments. This is followed by a discussion of related psychological constructs and the presentation of suggestive existing neural findings. To help prepare the grounds for a model-based neural analysis some speculations on the neural networks involved are provided, together with suggestions for future research.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Social ties are not only found to be important from an economic viewpoint, it is also shown that they can be modeled and related to neural substrates.</p><p><strong>Originality/value of the chapter: </strong>By providing an overview of the economic research on social ties and connecting it with the broader behavioral and neuroeconomics literature, the chapter may contribute to the development of a neuroeconomics of social ties.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"20 ","pages":"125-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in health economics and health services research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This chapter addresses the nature, formalization, and neural bases of (affective) social ties and discusses the relevance of ties for health economics. A social tie is defined as an affective weight attached by an individual to the well-being of another individual ('utility interdependence'). Ties can be positive or negative, and symmetric or asymmetric between individuals. Characteristic of a social tie, as conceived of here, is that it develops over time under the influence of interaction, in contrast with a trait like altruism. Moreover, a tie is not related to strategic behavior such as reputation formation but seen as generated by affective responses.

Methodology/approach: A formalization is presented together with some supportive evidence from behavioral experiments. This is followed by a discussion of related psychological constructs and the presentation of suggestive existing neural findings. To help prepare the grounds for a model-based neural analysis some speculations on the neural networks involved are provided, together with suggestions for future research.

Findings: Social ties are not only found to be important from an economic viewpoint, it is also shown that they can be modeled and related to neural substrates.

Originality/value of the chapter: By providing an overview of the economic research on social ties and connecting it with the broader behavioral and neuroeconomics literature, the chapter may contribute to the development of a neuroeconomics of social ties.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于社会关系的本质、模型和神经基础。
目的:本章讨论(情感)社会关系的性质、形式化和神经基础,并讨论关系与卫生经济学的相关性。社会关系被定义为一个人对另一个人的幸福所附加的情感重量(“效用相互依赖”)。关系可以是积极的也可以是消极的,个人之间可以是对称的也可以是不对称的。社会关系的特征,正如这里所设想的那样,是在相互作用的影响下随着时间的推移而发展的,与利他主义等特征相反。此外,领带与声誉形成等战略行为无关,而是由情感反应产生的。方法论/方法:一种形式化的方法与来自行为实验的一些支持性证据一起提出。接下来是对相关心理构念的讨论和现有神经学发现的提示。为了为基于模型的神经网络分析奠定基础,本文对所涉及的神经网络进行了一些推测,并对未来的研究提出了建议。研究发现:社会关系不仅从经济角度来看是重要的,而且还表明它们可以建模并与神经基质相关。本章的独创性/价值:通过对社会关系的经济研究进行概述,并将其与更广泛的行为和神经经济学文献联系起来,本章可能有助于社会关系神经经济学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Education on Health Behavior after Screening for Colorectal Cancer Educational Heterogeneity in the Association between Smoking Cessation and Health Information Birth Spacing and Educational Outcomes Unemployment Insurance and Physical Activity Causal Effects of Maternal Schooling on Child Immunization in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1