Sensory processing disorder: any of a nurse practitioner's business?

Mary W Byrne
{"title":"Sensory processing disorder: any of a nurse practitioner's business?","authors":"Mary W Byrne","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00417.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Children who exhibit the confusing symptom patterns associated with sensory processing deficits are often seen first by primary care providers, including family and pediatric nurse practitioners (NPs). The purpose of this article is to alert NPs to the state of the science for these disorders and to the roles NPs could play in filling the knowledge gaps in assessment, treatment, education, and research.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Literature searches using PubMed and MedLine databases and clinical practice observations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sensory integration disorders have only begun to be defined during the past 35 years. They are not currently included in the DSM IV standard terminology, and are not yet substantively incorporated into most health disciplines' curricula or practice, including those of the NP.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>NPs are in a unique position to test hypothesized terminology for Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD) by contributing precise clinical descriptions of children who match as well as deviate from the criteria for three proposed diagnostic groups: Sensory Modulation Disorder (SMD), Sensory Discrimination Disorder (SDD), and Sensory-Based Motor Disorder (SBMD). Beyond the SPD diagnostic debate, for children with sensory deficit patterns the NP role can incorporate participating in interdisciplinary treatment plans, refining differential diagnoses, providing frontline referral and support for affected children and their families, and making both secondary prevention and critical causal research possible through validation of consistently accepted diagnostic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"21 6","pages":"314-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00417.x","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00417.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Purpose: Children who exhibit the confusing symptom patterns associated with sensory processing deficits are often seen first by primary care providers, including family and pediatric nurse practitioners (NPs). The purpose of this article is to alert NPs to the state of the science for these disorders and to the roles NPs could play in filling the knowledge gaps in assessment, treatment, education, and research.

Data sources: Literature searches using PubMed and MedLine databases and clinical practice observations.

Conclusions: Sensory integration disorders have only begun to be defined during the past 35 years. They are not currently included in the DSM IV standard terminology, and are not yet substantively incorporated into most health disciplines' curricula or practice, including those of the NP.

Implications for practice: NPs are in a unique position to test hypothesized terminology for Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD) by contributing precise clinical descriptions of children who match as well as deviate from the criteria for three proposed diagnostic groups: Sensory Modulation Disorder (SMD), Sensory Discrimination Disorder (SDD), and Sensory-Based Motor Disorder (SBMD). Beyond the SPD diagnostic debate, for children with sensory deficit patterns the NP role can incorporate participating in interdisciplinary treatment plans, refining differential diagnoses, providing frontline referral and support for affected children and their families, and making both secondary prevention and critical causal research possible through validation of consistently accepted diagnostic criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感觉处理障碍:与执业护士有关吗?
目的:表现出与感觉处理缺陷相关的混淆症状模式的儿童通常首先由初级保健提供者,包括家庭和儿科护士从业人员(NPs)看到。本文的目的是提醒NPs了解这些疾病的科学现状,以及NPs在填补评估、治疗、教育和研究方面的知识空白方面可以发挥的作用。数据来源:文献检索使用PubMed和MedLine数据库和临床实践观察。结论:感觉统合障碍在过去的35年中才开始被定义。它们目前没有包括在DSM IV标准术语中,也没有实质性地纳入大多数卫生学科的课程或实践,包括NP的课程或实践。实践意义:NPs在测试感觉处理障碍(SPD)的假设术语方面处于独特的地位,通过提供符合或偏离三个拟议诊断组标准的儿童的精确临床描述:感觉调节障碍(SMD),感觉辨别障碍(SDD)和基于感觉的运动障碍(SBMD)。除了SPD诊断争论之外,对于有感觉缺陷模式的儿童,NP的角色可以包括参与跨学科治疗计划,改进鉴别诊断,为受影响的儿童及其家庭提供一线转诊和支持,并通过验证一致接受的诊断标准,使二级预防和关键因果研究成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The consensus model for regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners. A literature review: Advance directives and patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Healthcare system use by risky alcohol drinkers: A secondary data analysis. Alternative placements for women wearing pedometers. Evaluating the sleep/wake cycle in persons with asthma: Three case scenarios.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1