Stress-induced somatization in spouses of deployed and nondeployed servicemen.

Tracy Burton, David Farley, Anthony Rhea
{"title":"Stress-induced somatization in spouses of deployed and nondeployed servicemen.","authors":"Tracy Burton,&nbsp;David Farley,&nbsp;Anthony Rhea","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00411.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the level of perceived stress and somatization experienced by spouses of deployed versus nondeployed servicemen, and to determine the relationship between stress and somatization.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Using Lazarus and Folkman's theory of Stress and Coping, a descriptive correlational design was used with 130 participants; 68 spouses of nondeployed servicemen and 62 spouses of servicemen deployed to a combat zone. Participants completed a Perceived Stress Scale-10 and Patient Heath Questionnaire-15. An independent t-test was used to determine the level of perceived stress and somatization in each sample. The Pearson's correlation was used to determine the relationship between perceived stress score and level of somatization in the total sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spouses of deployed servicemen had significantly higher perceived stress scores than spouses of nondeployed service members (p <.001). Somatization scores were also significantly higher in spouses of deployed versus nondeployed servicemen (p <.001). A significant positive correlation was found between level of perceived stress and level of somatization (r = .878, p <.001).</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Providers should be familiar with common somatic symptoms, treatments used for somatization and adjunct community resources available to patients with stress-related somatization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"21 6","pages":"332-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00411.x","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00411.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the level of perceived stress and somatization experienced by spouses of deployed versus nondeployed servicemen, and to determine the relationship between stress and somatization.

Data sources: Using Lazarus and Folkman's theory of Stress and Coping, a descriptive correlational design was used with 130 participants; 68 spouses of nondeployed servicemen and 62 spouses of servicemen deployed to a combat zone. Participants completed a Perceived Stress Scale-10 and Patient Heath Questionnaire-15. An independent t-test was used to determine the level of perceived stress and somatization in each sample. The Pearson's correlation was used to determine the relationship between perceived stress score and level of somatization in the total sample.

Conclusions: Spouses of deployed servicemen had significantly higher perceived stress scores than spouses of nondeployed service members (p <.001). Somatization scores were also significantly higher in spouses of deployed versus nondeployed servicemen (p <.001). A significant positive correlation was found between level of perceived stress and level of somatization (r = .878, p <.001).

Implications for practice: Providers should be familiar with common somatic symptoms, treatments used for somatization and adjunct community resources available to patients with stress-related somatization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部署和非部署军人配偶的压力诱发躯体化。
目的:比较现役军人配偶与非现役军人配偶所经历的压力和躯体化水平,并确定压力和躯体化之间的关系。数据来源:采用Lazarus和Folkman的压力与应对理论,采用描述性相关设计,共130名被试;68名未部署军人配偶和62名部署到战区的军人配偶。参与者完成了感知压力量表-10和患者健康问卷-15。采用独立t检验确定每个样本的感知压力和躯体化水平。使用Pearson相关来确定总样本中感知压力得分与躯体化水平之间的关系。结论:外派军人配偶的感知压力得分明显高于非外派军人配偶(p实践意义:提供者应熟悉常见的躯体症状、用于躯体化的治疗方法以及与压力相关的躯体化患者可用的辅助社区资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The consensus model for regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners. A literature review: Advance directives and patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Healthcare system use by risky alcohol drinkers: A secondary data analysis. Alternative placements for women wearing pedometers. Evaluating the sleep/wake cycle in persons with asthma: Three case scenarios.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1