James F Schaus, Mary Lou Sole, Thomas P McCoy, Natalie Mullett, Mary Claire O'Brien
{"title":"Alcohol screening and brief intervention in a college student health center: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"James F Schaus, Mary Lou Sole, Thomas P McCoy, Natalie Mullett, Mary Claire O'Brien","doi":"10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study tested the effectiveness of brief primary care provider interventions delivered in a college student health center to a sample of college students who screened positive for high-risk drinking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Between November 2005 and August 2006, 8,753 students who presented as new patients to the health service at a large public university were screened for high-risk drinking, and 2,484 students (28%) screened positive on the 5/4 gender-specific high-risk drinking question (i.e., five or more drinks per occasion for men and four or more for women). Students who screened positive for high-risk drinking and consented to participate (N= 363; 52% female) were randomly assigned either to a control group (n = 182) or to an experimental group (n = 181). Participants in the experimental group received two brief intervention sessions that were founded in motivational interviewing techniques and delivered by four specially trained providers within the student health center. Data on alcohol use and related harms were obtained from a Web-based Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaire, 30-day Timeline Followback alcohol-use diaries, the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI), and eight items from the Drinker Inventory of Consequences-2L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures analysis showed that, compared with the control group (C), the intervention group (I) had significant reductions in typical estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) (C = .071 vs I = .057 at 3 months; C = .073 vs I = .057 at 6 months), peak BAC (C = . 142 vs I = .112 at 3 months; C = .145 vs I = .108 at 6 months), peak number of drinks per sitting (C = 8.03 vs I = 6.87 at 3 months; C = 7.98 vs I = 6.52 at 6 months), average number of drinks per week (C = 9.47 vs I = 7.33 at 3 months; C = 8.90 vs I = 6.16 at 6 months), number of drunk episodes in a typical week (C = 1.24 vs I = 0.85 at 3 months; C = 1.10 vs I = 0.71 at 6 months), number of times taken foolish risks (C = 2.24 vs I = 1.12 at 3 months), and RAPI sum scores (C = 6.55 vs I = 4.96 at 6 months; C = 6.17 vs I = 4.58 at 9 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brief interventions delivered by primary care providers in a student health center to high-risk-drinking students may result in significantly decreased alcohol consumption, high-risk drinking, and alcohol-related harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":17103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","volume":" 16","pages":"131-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2701092/pdf/jsad131.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study tested the effectiveness of brief primary care provider interventions delivered in a college student health center to a sample of college students who screened positive for high-risk drinking.
Method: Between November 2005 and August 2006, 8,753 students who presented as new patients to the health service at a large public university were screened for high-risk drinking, and 2,484 students (28%) screened positive on the 5/4 gender-specific high-risk drinking question (i.e., five or more drinks per occasion for men and four or more for women). Students who screened positive for high-risk drinking and consented to participate (N= 363; 52% female) were randomly assigned either to a control group (n = 182) or to an experimental group (n = 181). Participants in the experimental group received two brief intervention sessions that were founded in motivational interviewing techniques and delivered by four specially trained providers within the student health center. Data on alcohol use and related harms were obtained from a Web-based Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaire, 30-day Timeline Followback alcohol-use diaries, the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI), and eight items from the Drinker Inventory of Consequences-2L.
Results: Repeated measures analysis showed that, compared with the control group (C), the intervention group (I) had significant reductions in typical estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) (C = .071 vs I = .057 at 3 months; C = .073 vs I = .057 at 6 months), peak BAC (C = . 142 vs I = .112 at 3 months; C = .145 vs I = .108 at 6 months), peak number of drinks per sitting (C = 8.03 vs I = 6.87 at 3 months; C = 7.98 vs I = 6.52 at 6 months), average number of drinks per week (C = 9.47 vs I = 7.33 at 3 months; C = 8.90 vs I = 6.16 at 6 months), number of drunk episodes in a typical week (C = 1.24 vs I = 0.85 at 3 months; C = 1.10 vs I = 0.71 at 6 months), number of times taken foolish risks (C = 2.24 vs I = 1.12 at 3 months), and RAPI sum scores (C = 6.55 vs I = 4.96 at 6 months; C = 6.17 vs I = 4.58 at 9 months).
Conclusions: Brief interventions delivered by primary care providers in a student health center to high-risk-drinking students may result in significantly decreased alcohol consumption, high-risk drinking, and alcohol-related harms.
目的本研究测试了在大学生健康中心对高危饮酒筛查呈阳性的大学生样本进行初级保健提供者简短干预的效果:2005年11月至2006年8月期间,一所大型公立大学对8753名新到卫生服务机构就诊的学生进行了高危饮酒筛查,其中2484名学生(28%)在5/4性别高危饮酒问题(即男性每次饮酒5杯或5杯以上,女性每次饮酒4杯或4杯以上)上呈阳性。高危饮酒筛查呈阳性并同意参与的学生(363 人;52% 为女生)被随机分配到对照组(182 人)或实验组(181 人)。实验组的参与者接受了两节简短的干预课程,这些课程以动机访谈技术为基础,由学生健康中心的四名受过专门培训的服务人员提供。有关酒精使用和相关危害的数据来自网络健康生活方式问卷、30 天 Timeline Followback 酒精使用日记、罗格斯酒精问题指数(RAPI)以及饮酒者后果量表-2L 中的 8 个项目:重复测量分析表明,与对照组(C)相比,干预组(I)的典型估计血液酒精浓度(BAC)(3 个月时,C = .071 vs I = .057;6 个月时,C = .073 vs I = .057)、峰值 BAC(3 个月时,C = .142 vs I = .112;6 个月时,C = .145 vs I = .108)、每次坐着喝酒的峰值次数(3 个月时,C = 8.03 vs I = 6.87;6 个月时,C = 7.98 vs I = 6.52)均显著减少。98 vs 6 个月时 I = 6.52)、每周平均饮酒次数(3 个月时 C = 9.47 vs 6 个月时 I = 7.33;6 个月时 C = 8.90 vs 6 个月时 I = 6.16)、典型一周内醉酒次数(3 个月时 C = 1.24 vs 3 个月时 I = 0.85;6 个月时 C = 1.10 vs I = 0.71,6 个月)、冒愚蠢风险的次数(C = 2.24 vs I = 1.12,3 个月)和 RAPI 总分(C = 6.55 vs I = 4.96,6 个月;C = 6.17 vs I = 4.58,9 个月):由学生健康中心的初级保健提供者对高危饮酒学生进行简短干预,可显著减少酒精消费、高危饮酒和酒精相关危害。