Quantifying national spending on wellness and prevention.

George Miller, Charles Roehrig, Paul Hughes-Cromwick, Craig Lake
{"title":"Quantifying national spending on wellness and prevention.","authors":"George Miller,&nbsp;Charles Roehrig,&nbsp;Paul Hughes-Cromwick,&nbsp;Craig Lake","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We estimate national health expenditures on prevention using precise definitions, a transparent methodology, and a subdivision of the estimates into components to aid researchers in applying their own concepts of prevention activities.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We supplemented the National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) with additional data to identify national spending on primary and secondary prevention for each year from 1996 to 2004 across eight spending categories.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We estimate that NHEA expenditures devoted to prevention grew from $83.2 billion in 1996 to $159.8 billion in 2004, in current dollars. As a share of NHEA, this represents an increase from 7.8 percent in 1996 to 8.6 percent in 2004. This share peaked at 9 percent in 2002 and then declined due to reductions in public health spending as a percent of NHEA between 2002 and 2004. Primary prevention represents about half the expenditures, consisting largely of public health expenditures--the largest prevention element. ORIGINALITY/VALUE OF PAPER: Our 2004 estimate that 8.6 percent of NHEA goes to prevention is nearly three times as large as the commonly cited figure of 3 percent, but depends on the definitions used: our estimate falls to 8.1 percent when the research component is excluded, 5.1 percent when consideration is limited to primary prevention plus screening, 4.2 percent for primary prevention alone, and 2.8 percent if we count only public health expenditures. These findings should contribute to a more informed discussion of our nation's allocation of health care resources to prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"19 ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in health economics and health services research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We estimate national health expenditures on prevention using precise definitions, a transparent methodology, and a subdivision of the estimates into components to aid researchers in applying their own concepts of prevention activities.

Methodology/approach: We supplemented the National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) with additional data to identify national spending on primary and secondary prevention for each year from 1996 to 2004 across eight spending categories.

Findings: We estimate that NHEA expenditures devoted to prevention grew from $83.2 billion in 1996 to $159.8 billion in 2004, in current dollars. As a share of NHEA, this represents an increase from 7.8 percent in 1996 to 8.6 percent in 2004. This share peaked at 9 percent in 2002 and then declined due to reductions in public health spending as a percent of NHEA between 2002 and 2004. Primary prevention represents about half the expenditures, consisting largely of public health expenditures--the largest prevention element. ORIGINALITY/VALUE OF PAPER: Our 2004 estimate that 8.6 percent of NHEA goes to prevention is nearly three times as large as the commonly cited figure of 3 percent, but depends on the definitions used: our estimate falls to 8.1 percent when the research component is excluded, 5.1 percent when consideration is limited to primary prevention plus screening, 4.2 percent for primary prevention alone, and 2.8 percent if we count only public health expenditures. These findings should contribute to a more informed discussion of our nation's allocation of health care resources to prevention.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化国家在健康和预防方面的支出。
目的:我们使用精确的定义、透明的方法和将估计数细分为组成部分来估计国家预防卫生支出,以帮助研究人员应用他们自己的预防活动概念。方法/方法:我们用额外的数据补充了国家卫生支出账户(NHEA),以确定1996年至2004年每年在八个支出类别中用于一级和二级预防的国家支出。研究结果:我们估计NHEA用于预防的支出从1996年的832亿美元增加到2004年的1598亿美元。这一比例从1996年的7.8%增加到2004年的8.6%。这一比例在2002年达到9%的峰值,然后由于2002年至2004年期间公共卫生支出占全国卫生保健机构的百分比减少而下降。初级预防约占支出的一半,主要由公共卫生支出构成,这是最大的预防部分。论文原创性/价值:我们在2004年估计,8.6%的NHEA用于预防,这几乎是通常引用的3%的三倍,但这取决于所使用的定义:当排除研究部分时,我们的估计降至8.1%,当考虑仅限于初级预防加筛查时,我们的估计降至5.1%,仅初级预防为4.2%,如果仅计算公共卫生支出则为2.8%。这些发现应该有助于对我国卫生保健资源在预防方面的分配进行更明智的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Education on Health Behavior after Screening for Colorectal Cancer Educational Heterogeneity in the Association between Smoking Cessation and Health Information Birth Spacing and Educational Outcomes Unemployment Insurance and Physical Activity Causal Effects of Maternal Schooling on Child Immunization in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1