A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

Daniel J Wallace, William Stohl, Richard A Furie, Jeffrey R Lisse, James D McKay, Joan T Merrill, Michelle A Petri, Ellen M Ginzler, W Winn Chatham, W Joseph McCune, Vivian Fernandez, Marc R Chevrier, Z John Zhong, William W Freimuth
{"title":"A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.","authors":"Daniel J Wallace,&nbsp;William Stohl,&nbsp;Richard A Furie,&nbsp;Jeffrey R Lisse,&nbsp;James D McKay,&nbsp;Joan T Merrill,&nbsp;Michelle A Petri,&nbsp;Ellen M Ginzler,&nbsp;W Winn Chatham,&nbsp;W Joseph McCune,&nbsp;Vivian Fernandez,&nbsp;Marc R Chevrier,&nbsp;Z John Zhong,&nbsp;William W Freimuth","doi":"10.1002/art.24699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety, tolerability, biologic activity, and efficacy of belimumab in combination with standard of care therapy (SOC) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment (SELENA) version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score >/=4 (n = 449) were randomly assigned to belimumab (1, 4, or 10 mg/kg) or placebo in a 52-week study. Coprimary end points were the percent change in the SELENA-SLEDAI score at week 24 and the time to first SLE flare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences between the treatment and placebo groups were not attained for either primary end point, and no dose response was observed. Reductions in SELENA-SLEDAI scores from baseline were 19.5% in the combined belimumab group versus 17.2% in the placebo group. The median time to first SLE flare was 67 days in the combined belimumab group versus 83 days in the placebo group. However, the median time to first SLE flare during weeks 24-52 was significantly longer with belimumab treatment (154 versus 108 days; P = 0.0361). In the subgroup (71.5%) of serologically active patients (antinuclear antibody titer >/=1:80 and/or anti-double-stranded DNA [anti-dsDNA] >/=30 IU/ml), belimumab treatment resulted in significantly better responses at week 52 than placebo for SELENA-SLEDAI score (-28.8% versus -14.2%; P = 0.0435), physician's global assessment (-32.7% versus -10.7%; P = 0.0011), and Short Form 36 physical component score (+3.0 versus +1.2 points; P = 0.0410). Treatment with belimumab resulted in a 63-71% reduction of naive, activated, and plasmacytoid CD20+ B cells, and a 29.4% reduction in anti-dsDNA titers (P = 0.0017) by week 52. The rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the belimumab and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Belimumab was biologically active and well tolerated. The effect of belimumab on the reduction of SLE disease activity or flares was not significant. However, serologically active SLE patients responded significantly better to belimumab therapy plus SOC than to SOC alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":8405,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis and rheumatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24699","citationCount":"318","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 318

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety, tolerability, biologic activity, and efficacy of belimumab in combination with standard of care therapy (SOC) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: Patients with a Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment (SELENA) version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score >/=4 (n = 449) were randomly assigned to belimumab (1, 4, or 10 mg/kg) or placebo in a 52-week study. Coprimary end points were the percent change in the SELENA-SLEDAI score at week 24 and the time to first SLE flare.

Results: Significant differences between the treatment and placebo groups were not attained for either primary end point, and no dose response was observed. Reductions in SELENA-SLEDAI scores from baseline were 19.5% in the combined belimumab group versus 17.2% in the placebo group. The median time to first SLE flare was 67 days in the combined belimumab group versus 83 days in the placebo group. However, the median time to first SLE flare during weeks 24-52 was significantly longer with belimumab treatment (154 versus 108 days; P = 0.0361). In the subgroup (71.5%) of serologically active patients (antinuclear antibody titer >/=1:80 and/or anti-double-stranded DNA [anti-dsDNA] >/=30 IU/ml), belimumab treatment resulted in significantly better responses at week 52 than placebo for SELENA-SLEDAI score (-28.8% versus -14.2%; P = 0.0435), physician's global assessment (-32.7% versus -10.7%; P = 0.0011), and Short Form 36 physical component score (+3.0 versus +1.2 points; P = 0.0410). Treatment with belimumab resulted in a 63-71% reduction of naive, activated, and plasmacytoid CD20+ B cells, and a 29.4% reduction in anti-dsDNA titers (P = 0.0017) by week 52. The rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the belimumab and placebo groups.

Conclusion: Belimumab was biologically active and well tolerated. The effect of belimumab on the reduction of SLE disease activity or flares was not significant. However, serologically active SLE patients responded significantly better to belimumab therapy plus SOC than to SOC alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
belimumab在活动性系统性红斑狼疮患者中的II期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量范围研究。
目的:评价贝利单抗联合标准护理治疗(SOC)治疗活动性系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的安全性、耐受性、生物活性和疗效。方法:在一项为期52周的研究中,雌激素治疗红斑狼疮的安全性:系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)评分>/=4的国家评估(SELENA)版患者(n = 449)被随机分配到贝利单抗(1、4或10 mg/kg)或安慰剂组。主要终点是第24周SELENA-SLEDAI评分的百分比变化和首次SLE发作的时间。结果:治疗组和安慰剂组在两个主要终点均未达到显著差异,且未观察到剂量反应。联合贝利单抗组SELENA-SLEDAI评分较基线降低19.5%,而安慰剂组为17.2%。联合贝利单抗组首次SLE发作的中位时间为67天,而安慰剂组为83天。然而,贝利单抗治疗的患者在第24-52周至首次SLE发作的中位时间明显更长(154天vs 108天;P = 0.0361)。在血清学活性患者亚组(71.5%)(抗核抗体滴度>/=1:80和/或抗双链DNA [anti-dsDNA] >/=30 IU/ml)中,在第52周,贝利单抗治疗的selina - sledai评分显著优于安慰剂(-28.8% vs -14.2%;P = 0.0435),医生的整体评估(-32.7%对-10.7%;P = 0.0011),短表36物理成分得分(+3.0 vs +1.2分;P = 0.0410)。到第52周,使用贝利单抗治疗导致初始、活化和浆细胞样CD20+ B细胞减少63-71%,抗dsdna滴度降低29.4% (P = 0.0017)。贝利单抗组和安慰剂组的不良事件发生率和严重不良事件发生率相似。结论:Belimumab具有生物活性,耐受性良好。贝利单抗对降低SLE疾病活动性或耀斑的作用不显著。然而,血清学活动性SLE患者对贝利姆单抗加SOC的反应明显优于单独使用SOC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthritis and rheumatism
Arthritis and rheumatism 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Double-blind, Randomized, 8-week Placebo-controlled followed by a 16-week open label extension study, with the LPA1 receptor antagonist SAR100842 for Patients With Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Secukinumab Achievement of Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Related Remission: 2-Year Results from a Phase 3 Study Assessment of methods to quantitatively evaluate global synovitis activity with FDG-PET/CT Antibodies Against Domain 1 and Domain 4/5 of β2 Glycoprotein I : Clinical Relevance in Obstetric Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome A Self-Determination Theory Based Intervention to Increase Levels of Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Self-Determined Motivation, Physical Activity and Improve Health Outcomes Among Patients Living with Rheumatoid Arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1