The interferon response circuit in antiviral host defense.

O Haller, F Weber
{"title":"The interferon response circuit in antiviral host defense.","authors":"O Haller,&nbsp;F Weber","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viruses have learned to multiply in the face of a powerful innate and adaptive immune response of the host. They have evolved multiple strategies to evade the interferon (IFN) system which would otherwise limit virus growth at an early stage of infection. IFNs induce the synthesis of a range of antiviral proteins which serve as cell-autonomous intrinsic restriction factors. For example, the dynamin-like MxA GTPase inhibits the multiplication of influenza and bunyaviruses (such as La Crosse virus, Hantaan virus, Rift Valley Fever virus, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus) by binding and sequestering the nucleocapsid protein into large perinuclear complexes. To overcome such intracellular restrictions, virulent viruses either inhibit IFN synthesis, bind and inactivate secreted IFN molecules, block IFN-activated signaling, or disturb the action of IFN-induced antiviral proteins. Many viruses produce specialized proteins to disarm the danger signal or express virulence genes that target members of the IFN regulatory factor family (IRFs) or components of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. An alternative evasion strategy is based on extreme viral replication speed which out-competes the IFN response. The identification of viral proteins with IFN antagonistic functions has great implications for disease prevention and therapy. Virus mutants lacking IFN antagonistic properties represent safe yet highly immunogenic candidate vaccines. Furthermore, novel drugs intercepting viral IFN-antagonists could be used to disarm the viral intruders.</p>","PeriodicalId":76790,"journal":{"name":"Verhandelingen - Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van Belgie","volume":"71 1-2","pages":"73-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verhandelingen - Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van Belgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viruses have learned to multiply in the face of a powerful innate and adaptive immune response of the host. They have evolved multiple strategies to evade the interferon (IFN) system which would otherwise limit virus growth at an early stage of infection. IFNs induce the synthesis of a range of antiviral proteins which serve as cell-autonomous intrinsic restriction factors. For example, the dynamin-like MxA GTPase inhibits the multiplication of influenza and bunyaviruses (such as La Crosse virus, Hantaan virus, Rift Valley Fever virus, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus) by binding and sequestering the nucleocapsid protein into large perinuclear complexes. To overcome such intracellular restrictions, virulent viruses either inhibit IFN synthesis, bind and inactivate secreted IFN molecules, block IFN-activated signaling, or disturb the action of IFN-induced antiviral proteins. Many viruses produce specialized proteins to disarm the danger signal or express virulence genes that target members of the IFN regulatory factor family (IRFs) or components of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. An alternative evasion strategy is based on extreme viral replication speed which out-competes the IFN response. The identification of viral proteins with IFN antagonistic functions has great implications for disease prevention and therapy. Virus mutants lacking IFN antagonistic properties represent safe yet highly immunogenic candidate vaccines. Furthermore, novel drugs intercepting viral IFN-antagonists could be used to disarm the viral intruders.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗病毒宿主防御中的干扰素反应回路。
面对宿主强大的先天和适应性免疫反应,病毒已经学会了繁殖。它们已经进化出多种策略来逃避干扰素(IFN)系统,否则干扰素系统会在感染的早期阶段限制病毒的生长。ifn诱导一系列抗病毒蛋白的合成,这些抗病毒蛋白作为细胞自主的内在限制因子。例如,类似动力蛋白的MxA GTPase通过结合和隔离核衣壳蛋白到大的核周复合物中来抑制流感和布尼亚病毒(如拉克罗斯病毒、汉坦病毒、裂谷热病毒和克里米亚-刚果出血热病毒)的增殖。为了克服这种细胞内限制,毒性病毒抑制IFN合成,结合并灭活分泌的IFN分子,阻断IFN激活的信号传导,或干扰IFN诱导的抗病毒蛋白的作用。许多病毒产生专门的蛋白质来解除危险信号或表达针对IFN调节因子家族(IRFs)成员或JAK-STAT信号通路组分的毒力基因。另一种逃避策略是基于极端的病毒复制速度,这比IFN反应更有竞争力。具有IFN拮抗功能的病毒蛋白的鉴定对疾病的预防和治疗具有重要意义。缺乏IFN拮抗特性的病毒突变体代表了安全且具有高度免疫原性的候选疫苗。此外,新型药物拦截病毒干扰素拮抗剂可以用来解除病毒入侵者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intrinsic factors affecting apoptosis in bovine in vitro produced embryos. Chemotherapy during pregnancy: pharmacokinetics and impact on foetal neurological development. Malaria: host-pathogen interactions, immunopathological complications and therapy. International and national initiatives in biobanking. Lung transplantation for respiratory failure; Belgium amongst the world leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1