[Short-term efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on esophageal carcinoma].

Jun Wang, Chun Han, Xiao-Ning Li, Chao Gao, Jing-Hao Jia, Bo-Ning Cai, Xin Zhang, Ai-Qin Xiao
{"title":"[Short-term efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on esophageal carcinoma].","authors":"Jun Wang,&nbsp;Chun Han,&nbsp;Xiao-Ning Li,&nbsp;Chao Gao,&nbsp;Jing-Hao Jia,&nbsp;Bo-Ning Cai,&nbsp;Xin Zhang,&nbsp;Ai-Qin Xiao","doi":"10.5732/cjc.008.10436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal carcinoma has seldom been reported; its clinical efficacy and toxicity are still uncertain. This study was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of IMRT on esophageal carcinoma, and to observe adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2006 to March 2008, 37 patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal carcinoma were treated with IMRT. The treatment response, local control and survival were evaluated and the adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimal prescription dose of 100% of gross tumor volume (GTV D100) 95% of clinical target volume (CTV D95), and 95% of planning target volume (PTV D95) were (6 456+/-172)cGy, (6 293+/-145)cGy, and (5 988+/-53)cGy, respectively. The volumes of lung receiving irradiation of >or= 5 Gy, >or=10 Gy, >or=20 Gy and >or=30 Gy were (59.6+/-12.8)%, (39.5+/-8.7)%, (22.0+/-5.4)%, and (12.0+/-4.3)%, respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was (1 178+/-248)cGy. The overall response rate was 97.3% (36/37). The patients were followed-up for 8-29 months (median,13 months). The occurrence rates of grades 3-4 acute and late esophagitis, grades 2-4 acute and late pneumonitis were 16.2% and 7.2%, 10.8% and 8.1%. The 1-and 2-year local control rates were 72.9% and 72.9%. The 1-and 2-year overall survival rates were 80.9% and 67.4%. The 1-and 2-year disease-free survival rates were 73.5% and 51.4%. Local recurrence (69.2%) was the main reason of treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMRT is an effective treatment for esophageal carcinoma with low occurrence of acute and late radiation-related pneumonitis, but local failure is still a main problem for treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7559,"journal":{"name":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","volume":"28 11","pages":"1138-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.008.10436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background and objective: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal carcinoma has seldom been reported; its clinical efficacy and toxicity are still uncertain. This study was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of IMRT on esophageal carcinoma, and to observe adverse events.

Methods: From June 2006 to March 2008, 37 patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal carcinoma were treated with IMRT. The treatment response, local control and survival were evaluated and the adverse events were observed.

Results: The minimal prescription dose of 100% of gross tumor volume (GTV D100) 95% of clinical target volume (CTV D95), and 95% of planning target volume (PTV D95) were (6 456+/-172)cGy, (6 293+/-145)cGy, and (5 988+/-53)cGy, respectively. The volumes of lung receiving irradiation of >or= 5 Gy, >or=10 Gy, >or=20 Gy and >or=30 Gy were (59.6+/-12.8)%, (39.5+/-8.7)%, (22.0+/-5.4)%, and (12.0+/-4.3)%, respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was (1 178+/-248)cGy. The overall response rate was 97.3% (36/37). The patients were followed-up for 8-29 months (median,13 months). The occurrence rates of grades 3-4 acute and late esophagitis, grades 2-4 acute and late pneumonitis were 16.2% and 7.2%, 10.8% and 8.1%. The 1-and 2-year local control rates were 72.9% and 72.9%. The 1-and 2-year overall survival rates were 80.9% and 67.4%. The 1-and 2-year disease-free survival rates were 73.5% and 51.4%. Local recurrence (69.2%) was the main reason of treatment failure.

Conclusion: IMRT is an effective treatment for esophageal carcinoma with low occurrence of acute and late radiation-related pneumonitis, but local failure is still a main problem for treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【调强放疗治疗食管癌的近期疗效观察】。
背景与目的:调强放疗(IMRT)治疗食管癌的报道很少;其临床疗效和毒性尚不明确。本研究旨在评价IMRT治疗食管癌的短期疗效,并观察不良事件。方法:对2006年6月~ 2008年3月收治的37例颈胸段食管癌患者进行IMRT治疗。观察两组患者的治疗效果、局部控制和生存情况,并观察不良事件。结果:100%肿瘤总体积(GTV D100)、95%临床目标体积(CTV D95)、95%计划目标体积(PTV D95)的最小处方剂量分别为(6 456+/-172)cGy、(6 293+/-145)cGy、(5 988+/-53)cGy。接受>或= 5 Gy、>或=10 Gy、>或=20 Gy和>或=30 Gy辐照的肺体积分别为(59.6+/-12.8)%、(39.5+/-8.7)%、(22.0+/-5.4)%和(12.0+/-4.3)%。平均肺剂量(MLD)为(1 178+/-248)cGy。总有效率为97.3%(36/37)。随访8 ~ 29个月(中位13个月)。3 ~ 4级急性及晚期食管炎、2 ~ 4级急性及晚期肺炎的发生率分别为16.2%和7.2%、10.8%和8.1%。1年和2年当地控制率分别为72.9%和72.9%。1年和2年总生存率分别为80.9%和67.4%。1年和2年无病生存率分别为73.5%和51.4%。局部复发(69.2%)是治疗失败的主要原因。结论:IMRT治疗食管癌急性、晚期放射性相关性肺炎发生率低,是一种有效的治疗方法,但局部治疗失败仍是食管癌患者治疗的主要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D in association with VEGF receptor-3 in lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer]. [Correlation of the sensitivity of NP chemotherapy in non-small lung cancer with DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphism]. [Correlation of hypermethylation of TSP1 gene with TGF-beta1 level and T cell immunity in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma]. [Efficacy and survival of 92 cases of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor initially treated with multidisciplinary therapy]. [Clinical characteristics and prognosis of very young patients with breast cancer in the southern of China].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1