[Efficacy and survival of 92 cases of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor initially treated with multidisciplinary therapy].

Rou-Jun Peng, Xiao-Fei Sun, Xiao-Juan Xiang, Zi-Jun Zhen, Jia-Yu Ling, Gang-Ling Tong, Yi Xia, Guang-Chuang Xu, Wen-Qi Jiang
{"title":"[Efficacy and survival of 92 cases of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor initially treated with multidisciplinary therapy].","authors":"Rou-Jun Peng,&nbsp;Xiao-Fei Sun,&nbsp;Xiao-Juan Xiang,&nbsp;Zi-Jun Zhen,&nbsp;Jia-Yu Ling,&nbsp;Gang-Ling Tong,&nbsp;Yi Xia,&nbsp;Guang-Chuang Xu,&nbsp;Wen-Qi Jiang","doi":"10.5732/cjc.008.10609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor (ESFT) is aggressive. The optimal therapy modality for ESFT is still to be found. This study was to explore the clinical characteristics and therapy for ESFT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-two cases of ESFT were collected from January 1995 to April 2008 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and analyzed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of 92 cases, 23 were Ewing's sarcoma of bone, 21 extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma, 43 peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor, and 5 Askin tumor. Median follow-up time was 31.5 months (range, 10-137 months). Thirty-eight patients received multidisciplinary therapy and 19 single model therapy in non-metastasis group. Three-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were significantly different between non-metastatic multidisciplinary therapy group and non-metastatic single model group (63% vs. 20%, 46% vs. 18%, respectively, P<0.001). The patients who received surgery plus chemotherapy and plus radiation or not had longer survival than those treated with chemotherapy plus radiation in non-metastatic multidisciplinary therapy group (Chi2=7.591, 9.212; P=0.006, 0.002). CAV/IE alternative regimen was superior to other regimens in event-free survival, but not in overall survival (Chi2=6.950, 3.530; P=0.008, 0.06). Cox regression analysis suggested therapy model and response to treatment were independent prognostic factors for ESFT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our studying showed multidisciplinary therapy could significantly improve non-metastatic ESFT patients' survival. Chemotherapy plus surgery and plus radiation or not were superior to chemotherapy plus radiation in local control for the non-metastatic ESFT. Therapy model and response were independent prognostic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7559,"journal":{"name":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","volume":"28 12","pages":"1304-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.008.10609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background and objective: Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor (ESFT) is aggressive. The optimal therapy modality for ESFT is still to be found. This study was to explore the clinical characteristics and therapy for ESFT.

Methods: Ninety-two cases of ESFT were collected from January 1995 to April 2008 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and analyzed retrospectively.

Result: Of 92 cases, 23 were Ewing's sarcoma of bone, 21 extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma, 43 peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor, and 5 Askin tumor. Median follow-up time was 31.5 months (range, 10-137 months). Thirty-eight patients received multidisciplinary therapy and 19 single model therapy in non-metastasis group. Three-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were significantly different between non-metastatic multidisciplinary therapy group and non-metastatic single model group (63% vs. 20%, 46% vs. 18%, respectively, P<0.001). The patients who received surgery plus chemotherapy and plus radiation or not had longer survival than those treated with chemotherapy plus radiation in non-metastatic multidisciplinary therapy group (Chi2=7.591, 9.212; P=0.006, 0.002). CAV/IE alternative regimen was superior to other regimens in event-free survival, but not in overall survival (Chi2=6.950, 3.530; P=0.008, 0.06). Cox regression analysis suggested therapy model and response to treatment were independent prognostic factors for ESFT.

Conclusions: Our studying showed multidisciplinary therapy could significantly improve non-metastatic ESFT patients' survival. Chemotherapy plus surgery and plus radiation or not were superior to chemotherapy plus radiation in local control for the non-metastatic ESFT. Therapy model and response were independent prognostic factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[92例Ewing肉瘤家族肿瘤首发多学科治疗的疗效及生存率分析]。
背景与目的:尤文氏肉瘤家族肿瘤(Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumor, ESFT)具有侵袭性。ESFT的最佳治疗方式仍有待发现。本研究旨在探讨ESFT的临床特点及治疗方法。方法:对1995年1月~ 2008年4月中山大学肿瘤中心收治的92例ESFT患者进行回顾性分析。结果:92例患者中,骨内尤文氏肉瘤23例,骨外尤文氏肉瘤21例,外周原始神经外胚层肿瘤43例,Askin肿瘤5例。中位随访时间为31.5个月(范围10-137个月)。非转移组多学科治疗38例,单模式治疗19例。3年总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)在非转移性多学科治疗组和非转移性单模型组之间差异显著(分别为63% vs. 20%, 46% vs. 18%)。结论:本研究显示多学科治疗可显著提高非转移性ESFT患者的生存率。在非转移性ESFT的局部对照中,化疗加手术、加放疗或不加放疗优于化疗加放疗。治疗模式和疗效是独立的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D in association with VEGF receptor-3 in lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer]. [Correlation of the sensitivity of NP chemotherapy in non-small lung cancer with DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphism]. [Correlation of hypermethylation of TSP1 gene with TGF-beta1 level and T cell immunity in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma]. [Efficacy and survival of 92 cases of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor initially treated with multidisciplinary therapy]. [Clinical characteristics and prognosis of very young patients with breast cancer in the southern of China].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1