Utkarsh Kohli MD, Britney L. Grayson BS, Thomas M. Aune PhD, Laxmi V. Ghimire MD, Daniel Kurnik MD, C. Michael Stein MD
{"title":"Change in mRNA Expression after Atenolol, a Beta-adrenergic Receptor Antagonist and Association with Pharmacological Response","authors":"Utkarsh Kohli MD, Britney L. Grayson BS, Thomas M. Aune PhD, Laxmi V. Ghimire MD, Daniel Kurnik MD, C. Michael Stein MD","doi":"10.1111/j.1753-5174.2009.00020.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Aims. </b> Genetic determinants of variability in response to β-blockers are poorly characterized. We defined changes in mRNA expression after a β-blocker to identify novel genes that could affect response and correlated these with inhibition of exercise-induced tachycardia, a measure of β-blocker sensitivity.</p><p><b>Methods. </b> Nine subjects exercised before and after a single oral dose of 25mg atenolol and mRNA gene expression was measured using an Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST Array. The area under the heart rate-exercise intensity curve (AUC) was calculated for each subject; the difference between post- and pre-atenolol AUCs (Δ AUC), a measure of β-blocker response, was correlated with the fold-change in mRNA expression of the genes that changed more than 1.3-fold.</p><p><b>Results. </b> Fifty genes showed more than 1.3-fold increase in expression; 9 of these reached statistical significance (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Thirty-six genes had more than 1.3-fold decrease in expression after atenolol; 6 of these reached statistical significance (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Change in mRNA expression of <i>FGFBP2</i> and Probeset ID 8118979 was significantly correlated with atenolol response (<i>P</i> = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively).</p><p><b>Conclusion. </b> The expression of several genes not previously identified as part of the adrenergic signaling pathway changed in response to a single oral dose of atenolol. Variation in these genes could contribute to unexplained differences in response to β-blockers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Drug Information","volume":"2 3","pages":"41-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2009.00020.x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Drug Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2009.00020.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Aims. Genetic determinants of variability in response to β-blockers are poorly characterized. We defined changes in mRNA expression after a β-blocker to identify novel genes that could affect response and correlated these with inhibition of exercise-induced tachycardia, a measure of β-blocker sensitivity.
Methods. Nine subjects exercised before and after a single oral dose of 25mg atenolol and mRNA gene expression was measured using an Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST Array. The area under the heart rate-exercise intensity curve (AUC) was calculated for each subject; the difference between post- and pre-atenolol AUCs (Δ AUC), a measure of β-blocker response, was correlated with the fold-change in mRNA expression of the genes that changed more than 1.3-fold.
Results. Fifty genes showed more than 1.3-fold increase in expression; 9 of these reached statistical significance (P < 0.05). Thirty-six genes had more than 1.3-fold decrease in expression after atenolol; 6 of these reached statistical significance (P < 0.05). Change in mRNA expression of FGFBP2 and Probeset ID 8118979 was significantly correlated with atenolol response (P = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively).
Conclusion. The expression of several genes not previously identified as part of the adrenergic signaling pathway changed in response to a single oral dose of atenolol. Variation in these genes could contribute to unexplained differences in response to β-blockers.