[Feasibility and short-term efficacy of simplified intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma].

Wei-Guo Zhu, Chang-Hua Yu, Ji-Hua Han, Tao Li, Xi-Lei Zhou, Guang-Zhou Tao
{"title":"[Feasibility and short-term efficacy of simplified intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma].","authors":"Wei-Guo Zhu, Chang-Hua Yu, Ji-Hua Han, Tao Li, Xi-Lei Zhou, Guang-Zhou Tao","doi":"10.5732/cjc.009.10215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\nFor neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) does not necessarily meet all clinical requirements while intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may take up a lot of labour power and material resources. This study was to explore the feasibility of simplified IMPT(sIMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy for neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, and to investigate the acute toxicities and short-term efficacy of this treatment modality.\n\n\nMETHODS\nsIMRT plans were designed for 30 patients with neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Two target volumes were defined: PTV1, which was designed to irradiate to 64 Gy (2.13 Gy x 30 fractions); PTV2, which was given to 54 Gy (1.8 Gy x 30). The sIMRT plan included five equiangular coplanar beams. All patients concurrently received DDP+5-FU regimen with radiotherapy on d1-5 and d29-33. Chemotherapy was repeated for two cycles 28 days after radiotherapy.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe treatment was completed for all patients within 6 weeks, and only one patient had Grade 3 acute bronchitis. The complete response (CR) rate was 90.0% (27/30) and the partial response (PR) rate 10.0% (3/30). Overall response was 100% for esophageal lesions and the CR rate 76.5% (13/17). The PR rate was 23.5% (4/17) in lymph node lesions. The major toxicities observed were Grades I-II leukocytopenia.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nsIMRT can generate desirable dose distribution for neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, which is similar to sophisticated IMRT but obviously better than 3D-CRT. The short-term efficacy of sIMRT is satisfactory and its acute toxicities are tolerable.","PeriodicalId":7559,"journal":{"name":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","volume":"28 12","pages":"1265-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.009.10215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE For neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) does not necessarily meet all clinical requirements while intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may take up a lot of labour power and material resources. This study was to explore the feasibility of simplified IMPT(sIMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy for neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, and to investigate the acute toxicities and short-term efficacy of this treatment modality. METHODS sIMRT plans were designed for 30 patients with neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Two target volumes were defined: PTV1, which was designed to irradiate to 64 Gy (2.13 Gy x 30 fractions); PTV2, which was given to 54 Gy (1.8 Gy x 30). The sIMRT plan included five equiangular coplanar beams. All patients concurrently received DDP+5-FU regimen with radiotherapy on d1-5 and d29-33. Chemotherapy was repeated for two cycles 28 days after radiotherapy. RESULTS The treatment was completed for all patients within 6 weeks, and only one patient had Grade 3 acute bronchitis. The complete response (CR) rate was 90.0% (27/30) and the partial response (PR) rate 10.0% (3/30). Overall response was 100% for esophageal lesions and the CR rate 76.5% (13/17). The PR rate was 23.5% (4/17) in lymph node lesions. The major toxicities observed were Grades I-II leukocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS sIMRT can generate desirable dose distribution for neck and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, which is similar to sophisticated IMRT but obviously better than 3D-CRT. The short-term efficacy of sIMRT is satisfactory and its acute toxicities are tolerable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[简化调强放疗同步化疗治疗颈上胸段食管癌的可行性及近期疗效]。
背景与目的:对于颈胸上段食管癌,三维适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)不一定能满足所有临床要求,调强放射治疗(IMRT)可能占用大量的人力和物力。本研究旨在探讨简化IMPT(sIMRT)联合化疗治疗颈、上胸段食管癌的可行性,并探讨该治疗方式的急性毒性和短期疗效。方法:对30例颈上段食管癌患者设计sIMRT方案。定义了两个靶体积:PTV1,其设计照射剂量为64 Gy (2.13 Gy x 30分数);PTV2,给予54 Gy (1.8 Gy x 30)。sIMRT计划包括五个等角共面光束。所有患者均在d1-5和d29-33同时接受DDP+5-FU方案放疗。放疗后28天重复化疗2个周期。结果:所有患者均在6周内完成治疗,仅有1例发生3级急性支气管炎。完全缓解(CR)率为90.0%(27/30),部分缓解(PR)率为10.0%(3/30)。食道病变的总有效率为100%,CR率为76.5%(13/17)。淋巴结病变的PR为23.5%(4/17)。观察到的主要毒性是I-II级白细胞减少。结论:sIMRT治疗颈、上胸段食管癌能产生理想的剂量分布,与精密IMRT相似,但明显优于3D-CRT。sIMRT短期疗效满意,急性毒性可耐受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D in association with VEGF receptor-3 in lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer]. [Correlation of the sensitivity of NP chemotherapy in non-small lung cancer with DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphism]. [Correlation of hypermethylation of TSP1 gene with TGF-beta1 level and T cell immunity in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma]. [Efficacy and survival of 92 cases of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor initially treated with multidisciplinary therapy]. [Clinical characteristics and prognosis of very young patients with breast cancer in the southern of China].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1