A triad of evidence for care of women with genital piercings.

Cathy Young, Myrna L Armstrong, Alden E Roberts, Inola Mello, Elayne Angel
{"title":"A triad of evidence for care of women with genital piercings.","authors":"Cathy Young,&nbsp;Myrna L Armstrong,&nbsp;Alden E Roberts,&nbsp;Inola Mello,&nbsp;Elayne Angel","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00479.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To add three further dimensions of evidence for the care of women with genital piercings (GPs).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Following a literature review, a cross-sectional study replicated previous work, using a web-based survey. This triad of evidence provides (a) descriptive quantitative data (N = 240) about women with GPs, (b) qualitative data about women with GPs, as well as (c) clinical observations from 60 healthcare providers (HCPs) who have cared for women with GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three important findings about women with GPs were validated: (a) GPs were deliberate actions, sought for personal and sexual expression; (b) women with GPs treat piercings as a normal, meaningful part of their lives which produce sexual enhancement and expression; and (c) they continue to seek information about GP care from nonhealth providers. New data indicate that they have experienced depression (47%), abuse (physical 18%; emotional, 27%; sexual, 14%), and forced sexual activity (35%) in their lives. Several unsubstantiated assumptions about women with GPs are challenged with these data.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>GPs should not delay important health care. Health-protective, as well as health promotion, behaviors are important to reduce risks. Nurse practitioners (NPs) can become effective and resourceful advocates in three specific areas of care: (a) responsiveness to women with GPs, (b) collaborative decision making for the removal of jewelry, and (c) promotion of applicable patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"22 2","pages":"70-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00479.x","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00479.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Purpose: To add three further dimensions of evidence for the care of women with genital piercings (GPs).

Data sources: Following a literature review, a cross-sectional study replicated previous work, using a web-based survey. This triad of evidence provides (a) descriptive quantitative data (N = 240) about women with GPs, (b) qualitative data about women with GPs, as well as (c) clinical observations from 60 healthcare providers (HCPs) who have cared for women with GPs.

Conclusions: Three important findings about women with GPs were validated: (a) GPs were deliberate actions, sought for personal and sexual expression; (b) women with GPs treat piercings as a normal, meaningful part of their lives which produce sexual enhancement and expression; and (c) they continue to seek information about GP care from nonhealth providers. New data indicate that they have experienced depression (47%), abuse (physical 18%; emotional, 27%; sexual, 14%), and forced sexual activity (35%) in their lives. Several unsubstantiated assumptions about women with GPs are challenged with these data.

Implications for practice: GPs should not delay important health care. Health-protective, as well as health promotion, behaviors are important to reduce risks. Nurse practitioners (NPs) can become effective and resourceful advocates in three specific areas of care: (a) responsiveness to women with GPs, (b) collaborative decision making for the removal of jewelry, and (c) promotion of applicable patient education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
照顾有生殖器穿孔的妇女的三个证据。
目的:为女性生殖器穿孔(GPs)的护理增加三个进一步的证据维度。数据来源:在文献回顾之后,横断面研究使用基于网络的调查重复了先前的工作。这三个证据提供了(a)关于全科医生妇女的描述性定量数据(N = 240), (b)关于全科医生妇女的定性数据,以及(c)来自60名照顾过全科医生妇女的卫生保健提供者(HCPs)的临床观察。结论:对妇女全科医生的三个重要发现进行了验证:(a)全科医生是故意的行为,寻求个人和性表达;(b)接受全科医生治疗的妇女视穿孔为生活中正常而有意义的一部分,以增强和表达性;(c)他们继续从非健康提供者那里寻求关于全科医生护理的信息。新的数据表明,他们经历过抑郁(47%)、虐待(身体虐待18%;情感、27%;性行为(14%)和强迫性行为(35%)。这些数据挑战了一些关于女性全科医生的未经证实的假设。对实践的启示:全科医生不应延误重要的卫生保健。保护健康和促进健康的行为对减少风险很重要。护士从业人员(NPs)可以在三个特定的护理领域成为有效和足智多才的倡导者:(a)对有全科医生的妇女的响应,(b)对摘掉珠宝的协作决策,以及(c)促进适用的患者教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The consensus model for regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners. A literature review: Advance directives and patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Healthcare system use by risky alcohol drinkers: A secondary data analysis. Alternative placements for women wearing pedometers. Evaluating the sleep/wake cycle in persons with asthma: Three case scenarios.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1