The efficacy of hypnotic analgesia in adults: A review of the literature

Brenda L. Stoelb, Ivan R. Molton, Mark P. Jensen, David R. Patterson
{"title":"The efficacy of hypnotic analgesia in adults: A review of the literature","authors":"Brenda L. Stoelb,&nbsp;Ivan R. Molton,&nbsp;Mark P. Jensen,&nbsp;David R. Patterson","doi":"10.1002/ch.370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article both summarizes the previous reviews of randomized, controlled trials of hypnotic analgesia for the treatment of chronic and acute pain in adults, and reviews similar trials which have recently been published in the scientific literature. The results indicate that for both chronic and acute pain conditions: (1) hypnotic analgesia consistently results in greater decreases in a variety of pain outcomes compared to no treatment/standard care; (2) hypnosis frequently out-performs non-hypnotic interventions (e.g. education, supportive therapy) in terms of reductions in pain-related outcomes; and (3) hypnosis performs similarly to treatments that contain hypnotic elements (such as progressive muscle relaxation), but is not surpassed in efficacy by these alternative treatments. Factors that may influence the efficacy of hypnotic analgesia interventions are discussed, including, but not limited to, the patient's level of suggestibility, treatment outcome expectancy, and provider expertise. Based upon this body of literature, suggestions are offered for practitioners who are using, or would like to use, hypnosis for the amelioration of pain problems in their patients or clients. Copyright © 2008 British Society of Experimental &amp; Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":88229,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","volume":"26 1","pages":"24-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ch.370","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ch.370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

This article both summarizes the previous reviews of randomized, controlled trials of hypnotic analgesia for the treatment of chronic and acute pain in adults, and reviews similar trials which have recently been published in the scientific literature. The results indicate that for both chronic and acute pain conditions: (1) hypnotic analgesia consistently results in greater decreases in a variety of pain outcomes compared to no treatment/standard care; (2) hypnosis frequently out-performs non-hypnotic interventions (e.g. education, supportive therapy) in terms of reductions in pain-related outcomes; and (3) hypnosis performs similarly to treatments that contain hypnotic elements (such as progressive muscle relaxation), but is not surpassed in efficacy by these alternative treatments. Factors that may influence the efficacy of hypnotic analgesia interventions are discussed, including, but not limited to, the patient's level of suggestibility, treatment outcome expectancy, and provider expertise. Based upon this body of literature, suggestions are offered for practitioners who are using, or would like to use, hypnosis for the amelioration of pain problems in their patients or clients. Copyright © 2008 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人催眠镇痛的疗效:文献综述
本文总结了以往关于催眠镇痛治疗成人慢性和急性疼痛的随机对照试验的综述,并回顾了最近在科学文献中发表的类似试验。结果表明,对于慢性和急性疼痛状况:(1)与未治疗/标准护理相比,催眠镇痛持续导致各种疼痛结果的更大减少;(2)在减少疼痛相关结果方面,催眠往往优于非催眠干预(如教育、支持性治疗);(3)催眠的效果类似于含有催眠成分的治疗方法(如渐进式肌肉放松),但在疗效上并没有被这些替代疗法所超越。本文讨论了可能影响催眠镇痛干预效果的因素,包括但不限于患者的易受暗示水平、治疗结果预期和提供者的专业知识。基于这一文献,建议提供给从业人员谁正在使用,或想要使用,催眠改善疼痛问题在他们的病人或客户。版权所有©2008英国实验学会;临床催眠。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Photo-acoustic stimulation: theoretical background and ten years of clinical experience Preterm labour and clinical hypnosis Mindfulness and the mindful therapist: possible contributions to hypnosis Spiritual-transpersonal hypnosis Lucid dreaming – dreams of clarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1