{"title":"Epidemiologic and genetic aspects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects","authors":"Kit Sing Au, Allison Ashley-Koch, Hope Northrup","doi":"10.1002/ddrr.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The worldwide incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs) ranges from 1.0 to 10.0 per 1,000 births with almost equal frequencies between two major categories: anencephaly and spina bifida (SB). Epidemiological studies have provided valuable insight for (a) researchers to identify nongenetic and genetic factors contributing to etiology, (b) public health officials to design and implement policies to prevent NTD pregnancies, and (c) individuals to take precautions to reduce the chance of having an NTD-affected pregnancy. Despite extensive research, our knowledge of the genetic etiology of human NTDs is limited. Although more than 200 small animal models with NTDs exist, most of these models do not replicate the human disease phenotype. Over a hundred candidate genes have been examined for risk association to human SB. The candidate genes studied include those important in folic acid metabolism, glucose metabolism, retinoid metabolism, and apoptosis. Many genes that regulate transcription in early embryogenesis and maintain planar cell polarity have also been tested as candidates. Additionally, genes identified through mouse models of NTDs have been explored as candidates. We do not know how many genes in the human genome may confer risk for NTDs in human. Less than 20% of the studied candidate genes have been determined to confer even a minor effect on risk association. Many studies have provided conflicting conclusions due to limitations in study design that potentially affect the power of statistical analysis. Future directions such as genomewide association studies (GWAS) and whole exome or even whole genome sequencing are discussed as possible avenues to identify genes that affect risk for human NTDs. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2010;16:6–15.</p>","PeriodicalId":55176,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","volume":"16 1","pages":"6-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.93","citationCount":"289","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 289
Abstract
The worldwide incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs) ranges from 1.0 to 10.0 per 1,000 births with almost equal frequencies between two major categories: anencephaly and spina bifida (SB). Epidemiological studies have provided valuable insight for (a) researchers to identify nongenetic and genetic factors contributing to etiology, (b) public health officials to design and implement policies to prevent NTD pregnancies, and (c) individuals to take precautions to reduce the chance of having an NTD-affected pregnancy. Despite extensive research, our knowledge of the genetic etiology of human NTDs is limited. Although more than 200 small animal models with NTDs exist, most of these models do not replicate the human disease phenotype. Over a hundred candidate genes have been examined for risk association to human SB. The candidate genes studied include those important in folic acid metabolism, glucose metabolism, retinoid metabolism, and apoptosis. Many genes that regulate transcription in early embryogenesis and maintain planar cell polarity have also been tested as candidates. Additionally, genes identified through mouse models of NTDs have been explored as candidates. We do not know how many genes in the human genome may confer risk for NTDs in human. Less than 20% of the studied candidate genes have been determined to confer even a minor effect on risk association. Many studies have provided conflicting conclusions due to limitations in study design that potentially affect the power of statistical analysis. Future directions such as genomewide association studies (GWAS) and whole exome or even whole genome sequencing are discussed as possible avenues to identify genes that affect risk for human NTDs. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2010;16:6–15.
脊柱裂和其他神经管缺陷的流行病学和遗传学方面
世界范围内神经管缺陷(NTDs)的发病率在每1000个新生儿中1.0到10.0个之间,两大类的发生率几乎相等:无脑畸形和脊柱裂(SB)。流行病学研究为以下方面提供了宝贵的见解:(a)研究人员确定导致病因的非遗传和遗传因素,(b)公共卫生官员设计和实施预防NTD妊娠的政策,以及(c)个人采取预防措施以减少受NTD影响的妊娠的机会。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但我们对人类被忽视热带病的遗传病因的了解仍然有限。尽管存在200多个带有ntd的小动物模型,但其中大多数模型不能复制人类疾病表型。超过100个候选基因已被研究与人类SB的风险关联,研究的候选基因包括叶酸代谢、葡萄糖代谢、类维甲酸代谢和细胞凋亡的重要基因。许多调控早期胚胎发生转录和维持平面细胞极性的基因也被作为候选基因进行了测试。此外,通过ntd小鼠模型鉴定的基因也被作为候选基因进行了探索。我们不知道人类基因组中有多少基因可能导致人类罹患被忽视热带病的风险。被研究的候选基因中只有不到20%被确定对风险关联产生哪怕是很小的影响。由于研究设计的局限性,许多研究提供了相互矛盾的结论,这可能会影响统计分析的能力。讨论了全基因组关联研究(GWAS)、全外显子组甚至全基因组测序等未来发展方向,作为鉴定影响人类被忽视热带病风险的基因的可能途径。©2010 Wiley-Liss, IncDev - disability Rev 2010; 16:6-15。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。