“One man one job”: the marriage ban and the employment of women teachers in Irish primary schools.

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00309231003594271
Jennifer Redmond, Judith Harford
{"title":"“One man one job”: the marriage ban and the employment of women teachers in Irish primary schools.","authors":"Jennifer Redmond,&nbsp;Judith Harford","doi":"10.1080/00309231003594271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1932, the Irish government, facing an economic downturn, introduced a marriage ban which required that female primary school teachers were required to resign on marriage. This followed a series of restrictive legislative measures adopted by Irish governments throughout the 1920s which sought to limit women's participation in public life and the public sector. Such a requirement emerged in several countries in response to high unemployment and applied principally to women's white-collar occupations, leading some commentators to argue that it stemmed from a social consensus rather than an economic rationale. Despite opposition to the ban from the Irish National Teachers' Organisation (INTO) on the basis that it was unconstitutional, would lead to fewer marriages and that married women were in fact more suited to teaching children, it remained in place until 1958. Although the ban is much referred to as part of the gender ideology that informed legislation in the early years of independent Ireland, the particular history of married women teachers has been little researched in the academic context. Over 50 years since the rescinding of the ban, this article examines its impact through an analysis of primary sources, including government cabinet minutes and the public commentary of the INTO and positions this history within the international context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46283,"journal":{"name":"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA","volume":"46 5","pages":"639-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00309231003594271","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00309231003594271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In 1932, the Irish government, facing an economic downturn, introduced a marriage ban which required that female primary school teachers were required to resign on marriage. This followed a series of restrictive legislative measures adopted by Irish governments throughout the 1920s which sought to limit women's participation in public life and the public sector. Such a requirement emerged in several countries in response to high unemployment and applied principally to women's white-collar occupations, leading some commentators to argue that it stemmed from a social consensus rather than an economic rationale. Despite opposition to the ban from the Irish National Teachers' Organisation (INTO) on the basis that it was unconstitutional, would lead to fewer marriages and that married women were in fact more suited to teaching children, it remained in place until 1958. Although the ban is much referred to as part of the gender ideology that informed legislation in the early years of independent Ireland, the particular history of married women teachers has been little researched in the academic context. Over 50 years since the rescinding of the ban, this article examines its impact through an analysis of primary sources, including government cabinet minutes and the public commentary of the INTO and positions this history within the international context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一人一职”:婚姻禁令和爱尔兰小学聘用女教师。
1932年,面对经济衰退,爱尔兰政府出台了一项婚姻禁令,要求小学女教师在结婚后必须辞职。在此之前,爱尔兰政府在整个20世纪20年代采取了一系列限制性立法措施,试图限制妇女参与公共生活和公共部门。这种要求出现在一些国家,以应对高失业率,主要适用于妇女的白领职业,导致一些评论家认为,这是一种社会共识,而不是经济理由。尽管爱尔兰全国教师组织(INTO)反对这项禁令,认为它违反宪法,会导致婚姻减少,而且已婚妇女实际上更适合教孩子,但这项禁令一直持续到1958年。尽管这项禁令被认为是爱尔兰独立初期性别意识形态的一部分,影响了立法,但在学术背景下,已婚女教师的特殊历史却很少得到研究。禁令废除50多年来,本文通过分析主要来源(包括政府内阁会议纪要和INTO的公开评论)来考察其影响,并将这段历史置于国际背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
40.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: "Paedagogica Historica is undoubtedly the leading journal in the field. In contrast to a series of national journals for the history of education, Paedagogica Historica is the most international one." A trilingual journal with European roots, Paedagogica Historica discusses global education issues from an historical perspective. Topics include: •Childhood and Youth •Comparative and International Education •Cultural and social policy •Curriculum •Education reform •Historiography •Schooling •Teachers •Textbooks •Theory and Methodology •The urban and rural school environment •Women and gender issues in Education
期刊最新文献
Subject-specific classroom: technologisation of the pedagogical space in East Germany (SBZ/GDR, 1949–1989) Article of the Year Award Julian Huxley and a biological approach to education in British East Africa during the interwar era “Looking for pen pals”: internationalist upbringing in a school of the Lithuanian SSR in the late Soviet era Experimental education projects and their data collection. Policy history on experiments with “children’s life questions” in welfare-state Sweden late 1960s to early 1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1