Dentists' and specialists' knowledge of chronic orofacial pain: results from a continuing professional development survey.

Vishal R Aggarwal, Amy Joughin, Joanna M Zakrzewska, Fiona J Crawford, Martin Tickle
{"title":"Dentists' and specialists' knowledge of chronic orofacial pain: results from a continuing professional development survey.","authors":"Vishal R Aggarwal,&nbsp;Amy Joughin,&nbsp;Joanna M Zakrzewska,&nbsp;Fiona J Crawford,&nbsp;Martin Tickle","doi":"10.1308/135576111794065838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the knowledge of chronic orofacial pain within general dental practitioners (GDPs) and dental specialists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a recent national survey of GDPs and specialists on the diagnosis of facial pain, all those who responded were asked to answer four multiple-choice questions on chronic orofacial pain as part of a continuing professional development exercise. The questions were formulated using a review of the literature and consultation with a facial pain expert and were administered by post.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 380 subjects who completed the original survey, 212 (56%) returned completed multiple-choice questionnaires. Specialists correctly answered significantly more questions than GDPs (P<0.001). The majority of specialists-49/83 (59%)-obtained a score of three or more, compared to 39/129 (30%) GDPs. This was due to variation in answering one question. Significantly more specialists--50 (60%)--correctly selected trigeminal neuralgia (TN) as a condition that is not associated with COFP, whereas only 41 (32%) GDPs chose this answer. Both specialists and GDPs grossly underestimated the prevalence of COFP in secondary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that specialists and GDPs may have sufficient knowledge to make an appropriate diagnosis of COFP, but they also highlight the knowledge gaps and perhaps the need for more extensive inclusion of COFP in the dental undergraduate curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":79454,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","volume":"18 1","pages":"41-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576111794065838","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576111794065838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Aim: To explore the knowledge of chronic orofacial pain within general dental practitioners (GDPs) and dental specialists.

Methods: Following a recent national survey of GDPs and specialists on the diagnosis of facial pain, all those who responded were asked to answer four multiple-choice questions on chronic orofacial pain as part of a continuing professional development exercise. The questions were formulated using a review of the literature and consultation with a facial pain expert and were administered by post.

Results: Of the 380 subjects who completed the original survey, 212 (56%) returned completed multiple-choice questionnaires. Specialists correctly answered significantly more questions than GDPs (P<0.001). The majority of specialists-49/83 (59%)-obtained a score of three or more, compared to 39/129 (30%) GDPs. This was due to variation in answering one question. Significantly more specialists--50 (60%)--correctly selected trigeminal neuralgia (TN) as a condition that is not associated with COFP, whereas only 41 (32%) GDPs chose this answer. Both specialists and GDPs grossly underestimated the prevalence of COFP in secondary care clinics.

Conclusions: The results suggest that specialists and GDPs may have sufficient knowledge to make an appropriate diagnosis of COFP, but they also highlight the knowledge gaps and perhaps the need for more extensive inclusion of COFP in the dental undergraduate curriculum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙医和专家对慢性口腔面部疼痛的知识:一项持续专业发展调查的结果。
目的:探讨普通牙科医生(GDPs)和牙科专家对慢性口腔面部疼痛的认识。方法:根据最近对国内生产总值和面部疼痛诊断专家的全国调查,所有回应的人都被要求回答四个关于慢性口腔面部疼痛的多项选择题,作为持续专业发展练习的一部分。这些问题是通过回顾文献和咨询面部疼痛专家制定的,并通过邮寄进行管理。结果:在完成原始调查的380名受试者中,212人(56%)完成了多项选择问卷。结论:结果表明,专家和国内生产总值可能有足够的知识来做出适当的COFP诊断,但他们也强调了知识差距,也许需要更广泛地将COFP纳入牙科本科课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) at 20 years. A patient's view of dentistry 20 years ago, now, and in 20 years' time. Primary Dental Care: past, present and future. Primary dental care: time to revise the definition? Prim Dent Care 2000. 7(3):93-96. Dental specialist lists: are they necessary?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1