Towards interoperable reporting standards for omics data: hopes and hurdles.

Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Dawn Field, Chris F Taylor, Weida Tong, Marco Brandizi, Eamonn Maguire, Nataliya Sklyar
{"title":"Towards interoperable reporting standards for omics data: hopes and hurdles.","authors":"Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Dawn Field, Chris F Taylor, Weida Tong, Marco Brandizi, Eamonn Maguire, Nataliya Sklyar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the size and complexity of scientific datasets and the corresponding information stores grow, standards for collecting, describing, formatting, submitting and exchanging information are playing an increasingly active role. Several initiatives occupy strategic positions in the international scenario, both within and across domains. However, the job of harmonising reporting standards is still very much a work in progress; both software interoperability and the data integration remain challenging as things stand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The status quo with respect to standardization initiatives is summarized here, with particular emphasis on the motivation for, and the challenges of, ongoing synergistic activities amongst the academic community focused on the creation of truly interoperable standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Groups generating standards should engage with ongoing cross-domain activities to simplify the integration of heterogeneous data sets to the greatest possible extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":89276,"journal":{"name":"Summit on translational bioinformatics","volume":"2009 ","pages":"112-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Summit on translational bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the size and complexity of scientific datasets and the corresponding information stores grow, standards for collecting, describing, formatting, submitting and exchanging information are playing an increasingly active role. Several initiatives occupy strategic positions in the international scenario, both within and across domains. However, the job of harmonising reporting standards is still very much a work in progress; both software interoperability and the data integration remain challenging as things stand.

Results: The status quo with respect to standardization initiatives is summarized here, with particular emphasis on the motivation for, and the challenges of, ongoing synergistic activities amongst the academic community focused on the creation of truly interoperable standards.

Conclusions: Groups generating standards should engage with ongoing cross-domain activities to simplify the integration of heterogeneous data sets to the greatest possible extent.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向组学数据的互操作报告标准:希望与障碍。
背景:随着科学数据集的规模和复杂性以及相应的信息存储的增长,收集、描述、格式化、提交和交换信息的标准发挥着越来越积极的作用。有几项倡议在国际形势中占据战略地位,无论是在域内还是跨域。然而,协调报告标准的工作在很大程度上仍在进行中;目前,软件互操作性和数据集成仍然具有挑战性。结果:这里总结了标准化计划的现状,特别强调了学术界专注于创建真正可互操作标准的持续协同活动的动机和挑战。结论:制定标准的小组应该参与正在进行的跨领域活动,以最大程度地简化异构数据集的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of eligibility criteria complexity in clinical trials. The human studies database project: federating human studies design data using the ontology of clinical research. Analysis of False Positive Errors of an Acute Respiratory Infection Text Classifier due to Contextual Features. An R package for simulation experiments evaluating clinical trial designs. Ontology mapping and data discovery for the translational investigator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1