[A survey of anaesthesia for caesarean section in Poland].

Anestezjologia intensywna terapia Pub Date : 2010-04-01
Jacek Furmanik
{"title":"[A survey of anaesthesia for caesarean section in Poland].","authors":"Jacek Furmanik","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia have come to be regarded as a subspecialty.Various countries and societies have published evidence-based guidelines. In this paper are presented the results of a survey of anaesthesia for Caesarean section (CS), conducted in Poland in 2009.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>432 questionnaires were sent. The questions asked related to: characteristics of the hospital, premedication, preoperative laboratory screening, methods of anaesthesia, local analgesic agents (LA), postoperative enteral feeding, positioning, and analgesia.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The questionnaire return rate was 24%. Only 10 hospitals (out of 98) employed anaesthesiologists exclusively for obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia. Alkalinisation of gastric contents, gastric emptying drugs and H blockers were used in 38% of hospitals in elective CS, and in 32% of hospitals in emergency CS. Preoperative laboratory screening was conducted in 93% of hospitals before elective CS, and 77% before emergency CS (usually haematocrit, haemoglobin concentration, red blood count and platelets). In 50% of hospitals, the lowest acceptable concentration of platelets before central blocks was 100,000; while in 30% of hospitals, a level of 50,000 was considered acceptable. Spinal anaesthesia was used in more than 90% of elective CS cases in 75% of hospitals, in emergency CS--in 50% of patients only and in the presence of a foetal stress in 65% of hospitals general anaesthesia was preferred. Bupivacaine remains the most commonly used LA (97%). Lidocaine is still used in 3% of hospitals, and adjuvants are used in 42% of hospitals. The flat supine position was recommended in 75% of hospitals; and 13% of parturients were requested to stay in this position for 24 hours. In 74% of hospitals, enteral feeding was delayed, and in 27% was delayed for 24 hours after CS (27%). Postoperative analgesia was based on parenteral analgesics (usually paracetamol and ketoprofen). Pethidine was used in 35% of hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an urgent need for national guidelines on obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia in Poland.</p>","PeriodicalId":88221,"journal":{"name":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","volume":"42 2","pages":"65-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia have come to be regarded as a subspecialty.Various countries and societies have published evidence-based guidelines. In this paper are presented the results of a survey of anaesthesia for Caesarean section (CS), conducted in Poland in 2009.

Methods: 432 questionnaires were sent. The questions asked related to: characteristics of the hospital, premedication, preoperative laboratory screening, methods of anaesthesia, local analgesic agents (LA), postoperative enteral feeding, positioning, and analgesia.

Result: The questionnaire return rate was 24%. Only 10 hospitals (out of 98) employed anaesthesiologists exclusively for obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia. Alkalinisation of gastric contents, gastric emptying drugs and H blockers were used in 38% of hospitals in elective CS, and in 32% of hospitals in emergency CS. Preoperative laboratory screening was conducted in 93% of hospitals before elective CS, and 77% before emergency CS (usually haematocrit, haemoglobin concentration, red blood count and platelets). In 50% of hospitals, the lowest acceptable concentration of platelets before central blocks was 100,000; while in 30% of hospitals, a level of 50,000 was considered acceptable. Spinal anaesthesia was used in more than 90% of elective CS cases in 75% of hospitals, in emergency CS--in 50% of patients only and in the presence of a foetal stress in 65% of hospitals general anaesthesia was preferred. Bupivacaine remains the most commonly used LA (97%). Lidocaine is still used in 3% of hospitals, and adjuvants are used in 42% of hospitals. The flat supine position was recommended in 75% of hospitals; and 13% of parturients were requested to stay in this position for 24 hours. In 74% of hospitals, enteral feeding was delayed, and in 27% was delayed for 24 hours after CS (27%). Postoperative analgesia was based on parenteral analgesics (usually paracetamol and ketoprofen). Pethidine was used in 35% of hospitals.

Conclusion: There is an urgent need for national guidelines on obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia in Poland.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[波兰剖宫产麻醉调查]。
背景:产科麻醉和镇痛已被视为一个亚专科。许多国家和社会已经发布了基于证据的指南。本文介绍了2009年在波兰进行的剖腹产(CS)麻醉调查结果。方法:共发放问卷432份。所询问的问题涉及:医院特点、用药前、术前实验室筛查、麻醉方法、局部镇痛药(LA)、术后肠内喂养、体位和镇痛。结果:问卷回收率为24%。在98家医院中,只有10家医院专门雇用产科麻醉和镇痛麻醉师。38%的选择性CS医院和32%的急诊CS医院使用胃内容物碱化、胃排空药物和H受体阻滞剂。93%的医院在选择性CS前进行术前实验室筛查,77%的医院在紧急CS前进行术前实验室筛查(通常是红细胞比压、血红蛋白浓度、红细胞计数和血小板)。在50%的医院,中心阻塞前可接受的最低血小板浓度为100,000;而在30%的医院,5万的水平被认为是可以接受的。在75%的医院中,超过90%的选择性CS病例使用脊髓麻醉,在急诊CS中,只有50%的患者使用脊髓麻醉,65%的医院在存在胎儿应激的情况下首选全身麻醉。布比卡因仍然是最常用的药物(97%)。3%的医院仍在使用利多卡因,42%的医院仍在使用佐剂。75%的医院推荐平卧位;13%的产妇被要求保持这个姿势24小时。在74%的医院,肠内喂养延迟,27%的医院在CS后延迟24小时(27%)。术后镇痛以肠外镇痛为主(通常为扑热息痛和酮洛芬)。35%的医院使用哌替啶。结论:波兰迫切需要制定国家产科麻醉和镇痛指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balancing sedation and ICU delirium management for better patient outcomes Impact of the perioperative care model on mortality of patients treated in general surgery wards. [Effect of red blood cell transfusions on the frequency of infections in the ITU]. [Does the time of admission to ITU affect mortality?]. [Pain treatment in the emergency department: what do patients think?].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1