Decreasing systolic blood pressure and declining mortality rates in an untreated population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Ulla O Andersen, Jacob L Marott, Gorm B Jensen
{"title":"Decreasing systolic blood pressure and declining mortality rates in an untreated population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.","authors":"Ulla O Andersen,&nbsp;Jacob L Marott,&nbsp;Gorm B Jensen","doi":"10.1177/1741826710389355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate developments in 30 years mortality risk that may be associated with developments in population systolic blood pressure (SBP) and to evaluate possible secular trends in BP-associated mortality risk in the untreated population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Copenhagen City Heart Study is a prospective longitudinal epidemiological study. The present analysis comprised participants from survey 1 (1976-78) and 3 (1991-94).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BP measurements and other methods were fully standardized and unchanged throughout the observation period. Questionnaires were completed by the participants and double checked by the technicians while they were interviewing the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 077 persons participated. Age, systolic BP, diastolic BP, cholesterol, BMI, diabetes, gender and habitual physical activity were significant predictors of all-cause death in all age groups. Risk factor adjusted risk for all-cause death was significantly lower in survey 3 compared with survey 1. Among elderly people, there was no development in mortality risk. In the age groups 40-49 years and 50-59 years there were survey differences indicating a significant trend towards longer life expectancy compared with their age-matched counterparts in survey 1. The association between BP and mortality remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A declining risk of all-cause death was observed in the younger and middle-aged cohorts of the population. The decrease in systolic BP and decline in mortality risk in the same age groups points to a role of systolic BP in age-cohort differentiated improvements of life expectancy. The effect of systolic BP on mortality did not change during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":50492,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1741826710389355","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826710389355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate developments in 30 years mortality risk that may be associated with developments in population systolic blood pressure (SBP) and to evaluate possible secular trends in BP-associated mortality risk in the untreated population.

Design: The Copenhagen City Heart Study is a prospective longitudinal epidemiological study. The present analysis comprised participants from survey 1 (1976-78) and 3 (1991-94).

Methods: BP measurements and other methods were fully standardized and unchanged throughout the observation period. Questionnaires were completed by the participants and double checked by the technicians while they were interviewing the participants.

Results: 18 077 persons participated. Age, systolic BP, diastolic BP, cholesterol, BMI, diabetes, gender and habitual physical activity were significant predictors of all-cause death in all age groups. Risk factor adjusted risk for all-cause death was significantly lower in survey 3 compared with survey 1. Among elderly people, there was no development in mortality risk. In the age groups 40-49 years and 50-59 years there were survey differences indicating a significant trend towards longer life expectancy compared with their age-matched counterparts in survey 1. The association between BP and mortality remained unchanged.

Conclusion: A declining risk of all-cause death was observed in the younger and middle-aged cohorts of the population. The decrease in systolic BP and decline in mortality risk in the same age groups points to a role of systolic BP in age-cohort differentiated improvements of life expectancy. The effect of systolic BP on mortality did not change during follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在未经治疗的人群中收缩压降低和死亡率下降:来自哥本哈根市心脏研究的结果
目的:本研究的目的是评估可能与人群收缩压(SBP)发展相关的30年死亡风险的发展,并评估未治疗人群中与bp相关的死亡风险的可能长期趋势。设计:哥本哈根城市心脏研究是一项前瞻性纵向流行病学研究。本分析包括调查1(1976-78)和调查3(1991-94)的参与者。方法:血压测量等方法完全标准化,在整个观察期内保持不变。问卷由参与者填写,并由技术人员在采访参与者时进行复核。结果:18 077人参与。年龄、收缩压、舒张压、胆固醇、BMI、糖尿病、性别和习惯性体育活动是所有年龄组全因死亡的显著预测因子。调查3的危险因素调整后的全因死亡风险明显低于调查1。在老年人中,死亡风险没有增加。在40-49岁和50-59岁年龄组中,调查差异表明,与调查1中同龄的人相比,预期寿命有明显延长的趋势。血压与死亡率之间的关系保持不变。结论:在年轻和中年人群中观察到全因死亡的风险下降。同一年龄组收缩压的降低和死亡风险的降低表明收缩压在不同年龄组预期寿命改善中的作用。收缩压对死亡率的影响在随访期间没有改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High intensity interval training reduces systemic inflammation in post-PCI patients. A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased aortic pulse wave velocity: the Czech post-MONICA study. Long-term risk factor management after inpatient cardiac rehabilitation by means of a structured post-care programme. Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of MTHFR, PAI-1, ACE, PON1, and eNOS gene polymorphisms in patients with early onset coronary artery disease. Additive prognostic value of subjective assessment with respect to clinical cardiological data in patients with chronic heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1