A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased aortic pulse wave velocity: the Czech post-MONICA study.

Peter Wohlfahrt, Daniel Palous, Michaela Ingrischová, Alena Krajcoviechová, Jitka Seidlerová, Markéta Galovcová, Jan Bruthans, Marie Jozífová, Vera Adámková, Jan Filipovsky, Renata Cífková
{"title":"A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased aortic pulse wave velocity: the Czech post-MONICA study.","authors":"Peter Wohlfahrt,&nbsp;Daniel Palous,&nbsp;Michaela Ingrischová,&nbsp;Alena Krajcoviechová,&nbsp;Jitka Seidlerová,&nbsp;Markéta Galovcová,&nbsp;Jan Bruthans,&nbsp;Marie Jozífová,&nbsp;Vera Adámková,&nbsp;Jan Filipovsky,&nbsp;Renata Cífková","doi":"10.1177/1741826711398840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been increasingly used in general practice to identify individuals with low ABI at high cardiovascular risk. However, there has been no consensus on the clinical significance of high ABI. The aim of our study was to compare aortic stiffness as a marker of cardiovascular risk in individuals with low (<1.0), normal (1.0-1.4), and high ABI (>1.4).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 911 individuals from the Czech post-MONICA study (a randomly selected 1% representative population sample, aged 54 ± 13.5 years, 47% of men) were examined. ABI was measured using a handheld Doppler and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) using the Sphygmocor device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 911 individuals, 28 (3.1%) had low ABI and 23 (2.5%) high ABI. There was a U-shaped association between aPWV and ABI. aPWV was significantly higher in individuals with low and high ABI compared with the normal ABI group (11.1 ± 2.8, 8.3 ± 2.3, p < 0.001; 10.8 ± 2.5, 8.3 ± 2.3 m/s, p < 0.001, respectively). In a model adjusted for age, sex, systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure and examiner, aPWV remained increased in both extreme ABI groups compared with the normal ABI group. In logistic regression analysis, aPWV together with glucose level, male sex, and a history of deep venous thrombosis were independent predictors of high ABI, while cholesterol was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study showing increased aortic stiffness in individuals with high ABI, presumably responsible for increased left ventricular mass described previously in this group. These findings suggest increased cardiovascular risk of high ABI individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50492,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1741826711398840","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826711398840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been increasingly used in general practice to identify individuals with low ABI at high cardiovascular risk. However, there has been no consensus on the clinical significance of high ABI. The aim of our study was to compare aortic stiffness as a marker of cardiovascular risk in individuals with low (<1.0), normal (1.0-1.4), and high ABI (>1.4).

Methods: A total of 911 individuals from the Czech post-MONICA study (a randomly selected 1% representative population sample, aged 54 ± 13.5 years, 47% of men) were examined. ABI was measured using a handheld Doppler and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) using the Sphygmocor device.

Results: Of the 911 individuals, 28 (3.1%) had low ABI and 23 (2.5%) high ABI. There was a U-shaped association between aPWV and ABI. aPWV was significantly higher in individuals with low and high ABI compared with the normal ABI group (11.1 ± 2.8, 8.3 ± 2.3, p < 0.001; 10.8 ± 2.5, 8.3 ± 2.3 m/s, p < 0.001, respectively). In a model adjusted for age, sex, systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure and examiner, aPWV remained increased in both extreme ABI groups compared with the normal ABI group. In logistic regression analysis, aPWV together with glucose level, male sex, and a history of deep venous thrombosis were independent predictors of high ABI, while cholesterol was not.

Conclusion: This is the first study showing increased aortic stiffness in individuals with high ABI, presumably responsible for increased left ventricular mass described previously in this group. These findings suggest increased cardiovascular risk of high ABI individuals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高踝肱指数与主动脉脉搏波速度增加有关:捷克莫妮卡后研究。
背景:踝肱指数(Ankle brachial index, ABI)已越来越多地用于一般实践中,以识别具有低ABI的高危心血管患者。然而,对于高ABI的临床意义尚未达成共识。我们研究的目的是比较主动脉僵硬度作为低(1.4)患者心血管风险的标志。方法:对捷克monica后研究中的911人(随机抽取1%代表性人群样本,年龄54±13.5岁,男性占47%)进行检查。ABI采用手持式多普勒测量,主动脉脉冲波速度(aPWV)采用sphygmoor装置测量。结果:911例患者中,28例(3.1%)为低ABI, 23例(2.5%)为高ABI。aPWV与ABI呈u型相关。与ABI正常组相比,低ABI组和高ABI组的aPWV明显更高(11.1±2.8,8.3±2.3,p)。结论:这是第一个显示高ABI组患者主动脉硬度增加的研究,可能是该组先前描述的左心室质量增加的原因。这些发现表明,高ABI个体的心血管风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High intensity interval training reduces systemic inflammation in post-PCI patients. A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased aortic pulse wave velocity: the Czech post-MONICA study. Long-term risk factor management after inpatient cardiac rehabilitation by means of a structured post-care programme. Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of MTHFR, PAI-1, ACE, PON1, and eNOS gene polymorphisms in patients with early onset coronary artery disease. Additive prognostic value of subjective assessment with respect to clinical cardiological data in patients with chronic heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1