Gender disparities in the assessment and management of cardiovascular risk in primary care: the AusHEART study.

Fiona Turnbull, Hisatomi Arima, Emma Heeley, Alan Cass, John Chalmers, Claire Morgan, Anushka Patel, David Peiris, Andrew Weekes, Craig Anderson
{"title":"Gender disparities in the assessment and management of cardiovascular risk in primary care: the AusHEART study.","authors":"Fiona Turnbull,&nbsp;Hisatomi Arima,&nbsp;Emma Heeley,&nbsp;Alan Cass,&nbsp;John Chalmers,&nbsp;Claire Morgan,&nbsp;Anushka Patel,&nbsp;David Peiris,&nbsp;Andrew Weekes,&nbsp;Craig Anderson","doi":"10.1177/1741826710389369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Studies indicate ongoing gender-based differences in the prevention, detection and management of cardiovascular disease. The aims of this study were to determine whether there are differences in general practitioners' (GPs') perceptions of a patient's cardiovascular risk compared with the patient's estimated risk and in the patient's subsequent medical management according to patient sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Australian Hypertension and Absolute Risk Study (AusHEART) was a nationally representative, cluster-stratified, cross-sectional survey among 322 GPs. Each GP was asked to collect data on cardiovascular disease risk factors and their management in 15-20 consecutive patients (age ≥55 years) who presented between April and June, 2008. They were also asked to estimate each patient's absolute risk of a cardiovascular event in the next five years. The main outcomes were the Adjusted Framingham risk, GP estimated risk and proportion of patients receiving blood pressure-lowering, statin and antiplatelet therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5293 patients were recruited to the study, of whom 2968 (56%) were women. Among patients without established cardiovascular disease, the level of agreement between the GP estimated risk and the Adjusted Framingham risk was poor (<50%) and was similarly so for men (kappa coefficient 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.21) and women (0.19; 95% CI 0.16-0.22; P homogeneity = 0.57). For patients with established cardiovascular disease, however, women were more likely to be assigned by the GP to a lower risk category (66% vs. 54%, P < 0.001) and less likely to be prescribed combination (blood pressure-lowering, statin and antiplatelet) (44% vs. 56%, P < 0.001) therapy compared with men, even after adjusting for patient age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cardiovascular risk is underrecognized and undertreated in Australian primary care patients, with women apparently disproportionately affected. These findings underscore the importance of initiatives to raise awareness of cardiovascular disease in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":50492,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","volume":"18 3","pages":"498-503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1741826710389369","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826710389369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Aims: Studies indicate ongoing gender-based differences in the prevention, detection and management of cardiovascular disease. The aims of this study were to determine whether there are differences in general practitioners' (GPs') perceptions of a patient's cardiovascular risk compared with the patient's estimated risk and in the patient's subsequent medical management according to patient sex.

Methods: The Australian Hypertension and Absolute Risk Study (AusHEART) was a nationally representative, cluster-stratified, cross-sectional survey among 322 GPs. Each GP was asked to collect data on cardiovascular disease risk factors and their management in 15-20 consecutive patients (age ≥55 years) who presented between April and June, 2008. They were also asked to estimate each patient's absolute risk of a cardiovascular event in the next five years. The main outcomes were the Adjusted Framingham risk, GP estimated risk and proportion of patients receiving blood pressure-lowering, statin and antiplatelet therapy.

Results: A total of 5293 patients were recruited to the study, of whom 2968 (56%) were women. Among patients without established cardiovascular disease, the level of agreement between the GP estimated risk and the Adjusted Framingham risk was poor (<50%) and was similarly so for men (kappa coefficient 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.21) and women (0.19; 95% CI 0.16-0.22; P homogeneity = 0.57). For patients with established cardiovascular disease, however, women were more likely to be assigned by the GP to a lower risk category (66% vs. 54%, P < 0.001) and less likely to be prescribed combination (blood pressure-lowering, statin and antiplatelet) (44% vs. 56%, P < 0.001) therapy compared with men, even after adjusting for patient age.

Conclusions: Cardiovascular risk is underrecognized and undertreated in Australian primary care patients, with women apparently disproportionately affected. These findings underscore the importance of initiatives to raise awareness of cardiovascular disease in women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中心血管风险评估和管理的性别差异:AusHEART研究
目的:研究表明,在心血管疾病的预防、检测和管理方面存在性别差异。本研究的目的是确定全科医生(gp)对患者心血管风险的认知与患者估计的风险相比是否存在差异,以及根据患者性别对患者的后续医疗管理是否存在差异。方法:澳大利亚高血压和绝对风险研究(AusHEART)是一项具有全国代表性的、分簇分层的、横断面调查,共有322名全科医生参加。每位全科医生被要求收集2008年4月至6月期间就诊的15-20例连续患者(年龄≥55岁)的心血管疾病危险因素及其管理数据。他们还被要求估计每位患者在未来五年内发生心血管事件的绝对风险。主要结局是调整后的Framingham风险、GP估计风险和接受降血压、他汀类药物和抗血小板治疗的患者比例。结果:共有5293例患者被纳入研究,其中2968例(56%)为女性。在没有确定心血管疾病的患者中,全科医生估计的风险和调整后的Framingham风险之间的一致性很差(结论:澳大利亚初级保健患者对心血管风险的认识和治疗不足,女性明显不成比例地受到影响)。这些发现强调了提高妇女对心血管疾病认识的举措的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High intensity interval training reduces systemic inflammation in post-PCI patients. A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased aortic pulse wave velocity: the Czech post-MONICA study. Long-term risk factor management after inpatient cardiac rehabilitation by means of a structured post-care programme. Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of MTHFR, PAI-1, ACE, PON1, and eNOS gene polymorphisms in patients with early onset coronary artery disease. Additive prognostic value of subjective assessment with respect to clinical cardiological data in patients with chronic heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1