Identifying Children in Middle Childhood Who Are at Risk for Reading Problems.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 Social Sciences School Psychology Review Pub Date : 2010-06-01
Deborah L Speece, Kristen D Ritchey, Rebecca Silverman, Christopher Schatschneider, Caroline Y Walker, Katryna N Andrusik
{"title":"Identifying Children in Middle Childhood Who Are at Risk for Reading Problems.","authors":"Deborah L Speece,&nbsp;Kristen D Ritchey,&nbsp;Rebecca Silverman,&nbsp;Christopher Schatschneider,&nbsp;Caroline Y Walker,&nbsp;Katryna N Andrusik","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate a universal screening battery for reading that is appropriate for older elementary students in a response to intervention model. Multiple measures of reading and reading correlates were administered to 230 fourth-grade children. Teachers rated children's reading skills, academic competence, and attention. Children were classified as not-at-risk or at-risk readers based on a three-factor model reflecting reading comprehension, word recognition/decoding, and word fluency. Predictors of reading status included group-administered tests of reading comprehension, silent word reading fluency, and teacher ratings of reading problems. Inclusion of individually administered tests and growth estimates did not add substantial variance. The receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis yielded an area under the curve index of 0.90, suggesting this model may both accurately and efficiently screen older elementary students with reading problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"39 2","pages":"258-276"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3070313/pdf/nihms262756.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate a universal screening battery for reading that is appropriate for older elementary students in a response to intervention model. Multiple measures of reading and reading correlates were administered to 230 fourth-grade children. Teachers rated children's reading skills, academic competence, and attention. Children were classified as not-at-risk or at-risk readers based on a three-factor model reflecting reading comprehension, word recognition/decoding, and word fluency. Predictors of reading status included group-administered tests of reading comprehension, silent word reading fluency, and teacher ratings of reading problems. Inclusion of individually administered tests and growth estimates did not add substantial variance. The receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis yielded an area under the curve index of 0.90, suggesting this model may both accurately and efficiently screen older elementary students with reading problems.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别处于儿童中期有阅读问题风险的儿童。
本研究的目的是确定和评估一种适用于大龄小学生阅读的通用筛选方法。对230名四年级儿童进行了阅读和阅读相关的多项测量。老师们给孩子们的阅读能力、学术能力和注意力打分。根据反映阅读理解、单词识别/解码和单词流畅性的三因素模型,将儿童分为无风险或有风险的读者。阅读状态的预测指标包括小组管理的阅读理解测试、默词阅读流畅性测试和教师对阅读问题的评分。纳入单独管理的测试和增长估计并没有增加实质性的差异。经接受-操作者特征曲线分析,曲线下面积指数为0.90,表明该模型能够准确有效地筛选有阅读问题的大龄小学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology Review
School Psychology Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.
期刊最新文献
The Relationship between Intercoder Reliability of Data Extraction and Effect Measure Calculation in Single-Case Meta-Analysis Meta-Analytic Associations Between the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale and Students’ Social Competence With Peers The Association Between Bullying Victimization and Problematic Internet Use: The Role of Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Competencies How School Climate Relates to Other Psychosocial Perceptions and Academic Achievement across the School Year Informant Discrepancies in Universal Screening as a Function of Student and Teacher Characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1