Response to Intervention for Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties: Effects of a Primary and Secondary Intervention.

IF 3 3区心理学 Q1 Social Sciences School Psychology Review Pub Date : 2010-01-01

Sharon Vaughn, Paul T Cirino, Jeanne Wanzek, Jade Wexler, Jack M Fletcher, Carolyn D Denton, Amy Barth, Melissa Romain, David J Francis

{"title":"Response to Intervention for Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties: Effects of a Primary and Secondary Intervention.","authors":"Sharon Vaughn, Paul T Cirino, Jeanne Wanzek, Jade Wexler, Jack M Fletcher, Carolyn D Denton, Amy Barth, Melissa Romain, David J Francis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effectiveness of a yearlong, researcher-provided, Tier 2 (secondary) intervention with a group of sixth-graders. The intervention emphasized word recognition, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension, Participants scored below a proficiency level on their slate accountability test and were compared to a similar group of struggling readers receiving school-provided instruction. All students received the benefits of content area teachers who participated in researcher-provided professional development designed to integrate vocabulary and comprehension practices throughout the school day (Tier 1). Students who participated in the Tier 2 intervention showed gains on measures of decoding, fluency, and comprehension, but differences relative to students in the comparison group were small (median d = +0.16). Students who received the re searcher-provided intervention scored significantly higher than students who received comparison intervention on measures of word attack, spelling, the state accountability measure, passage comprehension, and phonemic decoding efficiency, although most often in particular subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"3-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3072689/pdf/nihms246017.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of a yearlong, researcher-provided, Tier 2 (secondary) intervention with a group of sixth-graders. The intervention emphasized word recognition, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension, Participants scored below a proficiency level on their slate accountability test and were compared to a similar group of struggling readers receiving school-provided instruction. All students received the benefits of content area teachers who participated in researcher-provided professional development designed to integrate vocabulary and comprehension practices throughout the school day (Tier 1). Students who participated in the Tier 2 intervention showed gains on measures of decoding, fluency, and comprehension, but differences relative to students in the comparison group were small (median d = +0.16). Students who received the re searcher-provided intervention scored significantly higher than students who received comparison intervention on measures of word attack, spelling, the state accountability measure, passage comprehension, and phonemic decoding efficiency, although most often in particular subgroups.

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

初中阅读困难学生对干预的反应：一级和二级干预的效果。

这项研究对一组六年级学生进行了为期一年、由研究者提供的二级（中学）干预的有效性进行了检验。干预强调单词识别、词汇量、流畅性和理解力。参与者在石板责任测试中得分低于熟练水平，并与接受学校提供指导的类似群体进行比较。所有的学生都得到了内容区老师的帮助，这些老师参与了研究者提供的专业发展，旨在将词汇和理解练习整合到整个学校（第一级）。参加第二级干预的学生在解码、流利性和理解方面有所提高，但相对于对照组的学生差异很小（中位数d = +0.16）。接受研究者提供的干预的学生在单词攻击、拼写、国家问责措施、段落理解和音位解码效率方面的得分明显高于接受比较干预的学生，尽管大多数情况下是在特定的子组中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

School Psychology Review Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.