Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research.

IF 3.5 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Public Understanding of Science Pub Date : 2010-11-01 DOI:10.1177/0963662510362834
Catherine A Schuppli, Daniel M Weary
{"title":"Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research.","authors":"Catherine A Schuppli,&nbsp;Daniel M Weary","doi":"10.1177/0963662510362834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Here we provide the first experimental evidence that public concerns about the use of animals in research are accentuated when genetically modified (GM) animals are used. Using an online survey, we probed participant views on two uses of pigs as research animals (to reduce agricultural pollution or to improve organ transplant success in humans) with and without GM. We surveyed 327 animal technicians, researchers, advocates, university students and others. In both scenarios and across demographics, support dropped off when the research required the use of GM pigs or GM corn. For example, 66% of participants supported using pigs to reduce phosphorus pollution, but this declined to 49% when the pigs were fed GM corn and to 20% when the research required the creation of a new GM line of pigs. Those involved in animal research were more consistently supportive compared to those who were not or those who were vegetarians.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":"19 6","pages":"686-97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0963662510362834","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Understanding of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510362834","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Here we provide the first experimental evidence that public concerns about the use of animals in research are accentuated when genetically modified (GM) animals are used. Using an online survey, we probed participant views on two uses of pigs as research animals (to reduce agricultural pollution or to improve organ transplant success in humans) with and without GM. We surveyed 327 animal technicians, researchers, advocates, university students and others. In both scenarios and across demographics, support dropped off when the research required the use of GM pigs or GM corn. For example, 66% of participants supported using pigs to reduce phosphorus pollution, but this declined to 49% when the pigs were fed GM corn and to 20% when the research required the creation of a new GM line of pigs. Those involved in animal research were more consistently supportive compared to those who were not or those who were vegetarians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对在研究中使用转基因动物的态度。
在这里,我们提供了第一个实验证据,表明当使用转基因动物时,公众对在研究中使用动物的担忧会加剧。通过一项在线调查,我们探讨了参与者对猪作为研究动物的两种用途(减少农业污染或提高人类器官移植成功率)的看法。我们调查了327名动物技术人员、研究人员、倡导者、大学生和其他人。在这两种情况下,当研究要求使用转基因猪或转基因玉米时,支持度都下降了。例如,66%的参与者支持用猪来减少磷污染,但当猪被喂食转基因玉米时,这一比例下降到49%,当研究要求创造新的转基因猪品种时,这一比例下降到20%。那些参与动物研究的人比那些没有参与动物研究的人或素食者更支持动物研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Public Understanding of Science is a fully peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Public Understanding of Science is the only journal to cover all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Topics Covered Include... ·surveys of public understanding and attitudes towards science and technology ·perceptions of science ·popular representations of science ·scientific and para-scientific belief systems ·science in schools
期刊最新文献
From climate scepticism to discourses of delay in UK editorials. Endorsement of scientific norms among non-scientists: The role of science news consumption, political ideology, and science field. Exploring AI identity: The media framing of communicative artificial intelligence in Singapore's news sites. From Big Farms to Big Pharma? Problematizing science-related populism. Science capital: Results from a Finnish population survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1